You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
California in for a devastating quake within 30 years
2008-04-15
These are the same guys who are warning us about global warming ...
SAN FRANCISCO -- A strong and potentially deadly earthquake is virtually certain to strike on one of California's major seismic faults with a magnitude of at least 6.7 within the next 30 years, scientists said Monday in releasing the first official forecast of statewide earthquake probabilities. By their calculations the probability of such a strong and damaging quake hitting somewhere the Golden state is now more than 99 percent.

A much more damaging quake of magnitude of 7.5 or greater is at least 46 percent likely to hit on one of California's restless web of active fault systems within the same three decades, but probably in the southern part of the state, the team of federal and state earthquake scientists warned.

The new report by the team of federal and state geologists, seismologists and geophysicists does not significantly change the current probability estimates for future large quakes on the Bay Area's major faults that were calculated five years ago, but it does provide the first detailed forecasts for the odds of future quakes on faults in the Los Angeles area: on the southern San Andreas, on the San Jacinto and on the Elsinore faults specifically. "In our two major metropolitan areas where odds are high that a large quake is coming, people think a lot about quakes whenever even a smaller one shakes ... but ten days later most folks forget them, and they shouldn't," said David Schwartz, an earthquake geologist at the U.S. Geological Survey in Menlo Park who served on the scientific review panel that evaluated the new probability estimates.

The analysis was requested by the California Earthquake Authority, a public agency created by the state Legislature in 1996 and funded by companies throughout the state that offer limited quake insurance to all comers. The scientists used complex analytical tools that they have developed over many years and new computer programs to arrive at their new forecasts of earthquake magnitudes and the faults they may rupture.

By their calculations, the probability that a 6.7 magnitude quake will hit on any one of the faults in the Bay Area is now set at 63 percent, only a tiny bit higher than the 62 percent estimated in 2003. But the probability for that kind of severely damaging quake on the Hayward-Rodgers Creek fault was increased in the new forecast from 27 percent to 31 percent.

The analysis was the first the scientists done of probabilities for quakes on several Southern California faults. They calculated the odds of a 6.7 magnitude quake striking within 30 years somewhere in the greater Los Angeles at two-to-one, a probability of 67 percent, according to the report. The single fault in all California with the highest probability of a large quake occurring within the next 30 years is the Southern San Andreas, and the seismic odds-makers set the number for it at 59 percent.
Posted by:Steve White

#8  Everyone knows that as AGW heats the planet the crust expands and cracks.
Posted by: Al Gore   2008-04-15 12:04  

#7  Quakes although potentially dangerous are just momentary events, it's volcanoes that can screw us badly.
And, I love the thirty year window. Just about everything will happen within thirty years.
Posted by: wxjames   2008-04-15 12:01  

#6  Are they talking about a physical, geologic quake or an economic one as their economy circles the toilet with the liberals pushing it down with the plunger as hard as they can?
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-04-15 10:44  

#5  Predicting quakes now, are we?

Statistics, boys. Doesn't say what WILL happen, says what MIGHT happen, with probabilities. Odds, basically.

California is a good bet for a quake (gee!) and has been for a long time. But holding your breath is probably unwise.
Posted by: Chief Running Gag   2008-04-15 10:41  

#4  A big quake in the Bay area is 'due' or near-due on a long-term statistical basis. Southern California would seem past-due. Quakes we CALL big, like the one that messed up the World Series in Oakland and the one outside LA in ?1994 were an order of magnitude less than the devastating ones that seem to have a frequency of 100-250 years. We do not know the hour or the day (or year), but we can be very sure it is coming.
Posted by: Menhadden Snogum6713   2008-04-15 08:07  

#3  Stump Logic™, can't argue that

at least, not gonna try...
Posted by: Frank G   2008-04-15 07:45  

#2  I worked for USGS in earthquake research in the early 1970s. We were measuring regional movements across the San Andreas Fault of about 30 mm/year.

At Roberta Drive in Woodside, across the San Andreas fault trace there was an old redwood stump that straddled the fault line of the 1906 earthquake. The west side of the stump was 12-ft further north than the east side of the stump.

Applying freshman logic, the time interval to the next earthquake would be:

T = (12 ft x 304.8 mm/ft)/30 mm/yr = 122 years

Estimated year when Big One™ hits:

1906+122 = Year 2028 AD > 2012 AD, so we will never see it

QED
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2008-04-15 02:00  

#1  OTOH, BLOGGER > argues that the recent "Earthquake Swarm" off OREGON, iff proven to be linked to San Andreas activity, may actually DELAY California's "Big One" as the Oregon swarm can also potentially work to ALLEVIATE PRESSURE/ENERGY???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-04-15 00:23  

00:00