You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
It's Obama, stupid: Carter and Gore to end Clinton bid
2008-04-14
DEMOCRAT grandees Jimmy Carter and Al Gore are being lined-up to deliver the coup de grâce to Hillary Clinton and end her campaign to become president.
After all, who knows better when it's over than Al Gore and Jimmuah Carter?
Falling poll numbers and a string of high-profile blunders have convinced party elders that she must now bow out of the primary race.
Why? Obama's doing a nice job of wrecking the second half of his primary campaign. It's more than possible he'll implode sometime between now and the convention, and Hillary could be there to pick up the pieces, for whatever they're worth at that point. Hillary has to bet on that because — newsflash! — there's nothing waiting for her if she quits now. She's never going to be the 'Lioness of the Senate', and the idea of being junior Senator from New York and sucking up to Chuckie Schumer the rest of her life can't be too appealing. And it isn't as if the party ever is going to turn to her in four or eight years. So she's in to August.
Former president Carter and former vice-president Gore have already held high-level discussions about delivering the message that she must stand down for the good of the Democrats. "They're in discussions," a source close to Carter told Scotland on Sunday. "Carter has been talking to Gore. They will act, possibly together, or in sequence."
That about covers all the possibilities, doesn't it ...
An appeal by both men for Democrats to unite behind Clinton's rival, Barack Obama, would have a powerful effect, and insiders say it is a question of when, rather than if, they act. Obama has an almost unassailable lead in the battle for nomination delegates, and is closing the gap with Clinton in her last stronghold, Pennsylvania, which votes on April 22. Clinton remains publicly defiant, insisting she will continue the battle with Obama all the way to the Democratic convention in August – when superdelegates, or party top brass, will have the chance to add their weight to primary votes.

But the party's top brass have concluded her further participation in the race can only harm the party as Republican nominee John McCain strives to take advantage of her increasingly bitter battle with Obama.
Obama is quite capable of harming the party all by himself.
Neither Carter and Gore are likely to object to the role of bringing down the curtain on Clinton. While neither man has formally endorsed either her or Obama, both have clashed in the past with the Clintons. Gore blames his loss to George Bush in the 2000 presidential election on the impeachment of Clinton triggered by his White House affair with Monica Lewinsky. Carter, who has carved out a successful career as an international mediator, is believed to detest the flashy style of the Clintons. He recently told an interviewer that his entire family are committed Obama supporters.
Of course, if Al Gore had been a man in 1998 and had said to Bill, "you go or I go", he either would have been president right then or been in an unassailable position for the 2000 election. Instead of being a man of conviction, he's just another craven politican.
A number of options are being considered by the higher echelons of the Democrats, but they fall roughly into two categories. One is for Carter and Gore to go to Clinton privately and ask her to step down.
Hillary has more balls than both of them put together. She'd have their heads on spikes on her front lawn. Which, by the way, would bring in more Republician crossover votes.
The other is for both men to appear in public and endorse Obama – a move which would see a majority of superdelegates go with them.

The campaign to force Clinton to make an early exit is being masterminded in Congress, home to the most influential of the superdelegates. Senate Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi ...
... neither of whom have enough to do ...
... have called on superdelegates to hold an unofficial congress in early June to anoint a winner, rather than waiting for the convention in Denver. Pelosi has drawn withering fire from the Clinton camp for saying that these superdelegates must follow the national vote, with Clinton insisting that they should "vote with their conscience".
If the party had wanted them to follow the national vote, they wouldn't have created 'superdelegates' in the first place.
Posted by:Steve White

#16  NEWSMAX > DE BORCHGRAVE - 44th PRESIDENT WILL HAVE TO DEAL WITH UNPREDICTABLE TERRORISTS. The threat of Islamism as coupled or affected by DECLINING WORLD RESOURCES + Islam's need for a MARTIN LUTHER KING, or better yet a MARTIN LUTHER, to induce and lead VITAL = BADLY NEEDED, LONG OVERDUE REFORMS WITHIN ISLAM.

* TOPIX > THE FLAME OF DEMOCRACY IS SLOWLY DYING OUT, vv AUTHORITARIANISM due to pan-Moderates + Democractists' alleged failure to halt or contain the ISLAMIST THREAT + vari WORLD PROBS.

* TOPIX again > TOP DPRK OFFICIAL: THE REUNIFICATION OF THE KOREAN PENISULA CAN NO LONGER BE POSTPONED; + NORTH KOREA VOWS WILL NOT WORK WITH NEW SOUTH KOREA/ROK GOVERNMENT; + ASIA: TALKING PEACE WHILE PREPARING FOR WAR. NORTH KOREA - Officio vows NOKOR will not accept and will continue to resist the influence of the US-West both in Seoul = SOKOR Govt + Asia.

IMO NOKOR has only three scenarios/options:
1. Accede to the collective or unified demands of the Six-Party Talks, including the proposed US-NK Nuclear Declaration.
2. The USA will PC covertly allow NOKOR to dev indigenous NUCLEAR WEAPONS as a NK bargaining chip agz US-World [SSSHHHH, read - CHINA]. Prob is SOKOR-JAPAN, etc. tolerance for this [read- TRUST OF PYONGYANG + CHIN LACK OF MIL RESPONSE OUTSIDE OF NK].
3. NOKOR willfully initiates a MUTUALLY DESTRUCTIVE, ALL-OUT ATTACK AGZ SOKOR + USFK/UNC, etc. IN THE HOPES OF A INDUCING A US-CHINA CONFLICT IN WHICH CHINA WILL LOSE = OTHERWISE FORCED TO GIVE UP CONTROL = SUZERAINTY OVER NOKOR.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-04-14 23:32  

#15  God, I hope so, Steve.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2008-04-14 20:34  

#14  At the rate things are going, I expect the Manifest Destiny of the Democratic Party will be banging around in the Dustbin of History for some time to come.
Posted by: SteveS   2008-04-14 16:56  

#13  What the hell scares them so bad about putting it to a vote?

I can' figure this out either. Yeah, it'll be acrimonious: that's politics, people.

A while back an Arab blogger (Egyptian, I think) expressed indignation that Hillary didn't gracefully step aside and make way for the Manifest Future of the Democratic Party. I laughed out loud.

Now, some Egyptian shmoe has an excuse for not knowing how democracy is done. Don't know what Gore and Carter's excuse is.
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2008-04-14 16:50  

#12  Gore and Jimmy will have to pry her cold dead hands from the drapes she is fitting for the Whitehouse.
Posted by: JohnQC   2008-04-14 16:01  

#11  This has got to be a friggin opinion piece. There is not one sourced reference in the entire thing. Gore and Carter ARE NO LONGER RELEVANT! Hillary would no more listen to these two asshats than she would Karl Rove. Cripe, who makes this shit up?
Posted by: remoteman   2008-04-14 14:24  

#10  When Al and Jimmy are the guy's you're counting on to ride to your rescue, you've got serious problems...
Posted by: tu3031   2008-04-14 13:08  

#9  Oh, they're telling the voters what to do........

that is not a good thing...........

This is really getting entertaining.....

I hope it lasts until the convention - I just may watch.
Posted by: anonymous2u   2008-04-14 12:43  

#8  He's always had less sense than a rabid squirrel.

Or a killer rabbit.
Posted by: xbalanke   2008-04-14 12:40  

#7  Yeah? And when Hilly tells 'em to go piss up a rope, what will they do?
Posted by: Chief Running Gag   2008-04-14 11:12  

#6  What the hell is it with these democrat ex-president, ex-vice-president types (Carter, Gore, Clinton)? They're all living in some dream world where they're still relevant. Get a clue - nobody gives a sh*t! STFU.
Posted by: Spot   2008-04-14 08:26  

#5  Two losers and con artists backing a politician with no experience to push out a blackmail expert.

Sounds like a match made in heaven.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-04-14 08:24  

#4  The campaign to force Clinton to make an early exit is being masterminded in Congress

I'm glad to see they are at least busy at something.
Posted by: Besoeker   2008-04-14 08:17  

#3  The donks are scared shitless about having a convention this year. What the hell scares them so bad about putting it to a vote? Are they going to try to declare BHO president half way through October?
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-04-14 07:57  

#2  If it were any other pair of politicians, I'd call this a case of somebody using their names to jostle the Clinton campaign & get them off-balance. With that craven hypocrite Carter involved? Even odds this is a valid feeler. He's always had less sense than a rabid squirrel.
Posted by: Mitch H.   2008-04-14 07:28  

#1  Carter and Gore to end Clinton bid

Why all the machinations? If those two really want Hillary out, they should just endorse her.
Posted by: gorb   2008-04-14 01:23  

00:00