Submit your comments on this article | |
Africa Subsaharan | |
Could Zimbabwe vote oust Mugabe? | |
2008-03-28 | |
Few parts of Zimbabwe would like to see the end of President Robert Mugabe's regime more than Matabeleland. Ethnic repression against the Zulu-speaking ![]() "If [former finance minister Simba Makoni] wins, we'll have unrest, because Mugabe will fight. Either way, civil society should continue to press for our rights, and join hands with other democratic forces to make sure this government is delegitimized. Democracy is not final until it respects the will of the people," he says. Zimbabwe has never been so close to economic collapse – and oddly, to political renewal – as it will be this month. An inflation rate of 100,000 percent, the result of socialist land redistribution, mismanagement, corruption, and the withdrawal of Western financial support, has created unspeakable hardship for the Zimbabwean people. But hardship has also hardened the feelings of many Zimbabweans that the time has come for a change in leadership. The question now is how Mugabe's own party, the ZANU-PF – which controls the Army, police, the intelligence services, the election commission, and nearly all news media outlets – will respond to the public mood.
| |
Posted by:Fred |
#8 MOSCOW NEWS > for some mysterious reason which I'm still trying to comprehend, this Zimbabwe vote is seen as a vote for = against Great Britain even though Zimbabwe has been independent for decades already. |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2008-03-28 21:53 |
#7 it would still take a decade or two for foreign investment to correct the damage he has done I'm all in favor of letting them do it entirely by themselves, They've lived off the public (International) Tit long enough, Start by raising their own food (Backyard gardens) and rise by their own bootstraps from there. America did it. If they're forced to do it themselves, they'll be a lot less likely to let it be stolen next go-round, if it's from "Somebody else's" (Read UN) they just don't care. |
Posted by: Redneck Jim 2008-03-28 15:40 |
#6 it would still take a decade or two for foreign investment to correct the damage he has done I'm all in favor of letting them do it entirely by themselves, They've lived off the public (International) Tit long enough, Start by raising their own food (Backyard gardens) and rise by their own bootstraps from there. America did it. If they're forced to do it themselves, they'll be a lot less likely to let it be stolen next go-round, if it's from "Somebody else's" (Read UN) they just don't care. |
Posted by: Redneck Jim 2008-03-28 15:38 |
#5 Yeah, too bad all that money the elites want to |
Posted by: M. Murcek 2008-03-28 08:35 |
#4 They're doomed. The best and brightest have already fled the country. "Voting with their feet" and all that. Bob has turned a economic turndown and black nationalism into a major catastrophe that will take generations to repair. If Bob and his allies were dead tomorrow, it would still take a decade or two for foreign investment to correct the damage he has done. Assuming no civil wars... |
Posted by: Vanc 2008-03-28 03:28 |
#3 I love how "the withdrawal of Western financial support" is given equal weight to the cause of the crisis, along with such niggling factors as "socialist land redistribution, mismanagement, and corruption" |
Posted by: gromky 2008-03-28 01:21 |
#2 Yep, the cycle will repeat, starting with half the population and 1/10th the wealth next time. |
Posted by: ed 2008-03-28 00:27 |
#1 "Could Zimbabwe vote oust Mugabe?" Over his dead body. Say,...... |
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut 2008-03-28 00:23 |