You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Great White North
Scrutinizing the human rights machine
2008-03-23
Next Tuesday, at the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal in Ottawa, one of Canada's most prominent white supremacist propagandists, backed by the legal team that defended Holocaust-denier Ernst Zundel, will put the country's entire human rights bureaucracy on the witness stand.
I may have mentioned this before, but I'm still curious as to how "human rights" came to represent something other than individual liberty. Through some sort of antilogic, we've arrived at a point where "human rights" means strangling the freedoms of most of us to ensure the primacy of the opinions of some of us. Occasionally it's in a good cause -- I'm certainly not fond of holocaust deniers and their assaults on logic and truth -- but it seems to me that you've got to allow most of that sort of thing on the assumption that the right to express your opinion is nearly absolute. Once that freedom is curtailed it's like the loss of virginity: you don't get it back. Instead you end up with the straightjacker of political correctitude, which leads in its turn to rule by the holier-than-thou.
After months of closed-door wrangling, a constitutional challenge, an appeal to federal court and a blizzard of legal motions, Marc Lemire can now interrogate, under oath, two investigators of the Canadian Human Rights Commission about why they posted provocative comments on his and other ultra-conservative Web sites. Much credibility hangs on their answers.
Posted by:Fred

#3  "human rights machine"

The only correct word in that phrase is "machine."
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2008-03-23 19:57  

#2  Well said, Fred. That's exactly what these "human rights" clubs in Canada are about: throttling any dissent to their point of view and silencing any speech which may depict them in less than a view favorable to their own cause. A subversion of the democratic ideal.
Posted by: Woozle Elmeter 2700   2008-03-23 10:47  

#1  The CHRC tried last year to block the testimony of its own investigators by invoking section 37 of the Evidence Act, normally used for national security cases, citing threats to their personal safety. Facing a review by a higher court, they capitulated, but demanded the hearing be closed to the public.

This week, however, a one-man Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, Athanasios Hadjis, ruled firmly against the commission. He wrote that its legal gamesmanship "gives me pause to question the soundness of the Commission's invocation of public security concerns."

And so the very fact that the hearing room door will be unlocked is a hard-won concession from Canada's beleaguered human rights bureaucracy. To judge from the Internet chatter of white supremacists and merely conservative journalists, it will be standing room only.


sunlight is the best disinfectant
Posted by: Frank G   2008-03-23 07:24  

00:00