You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
We cannot win Iraq war - Clinton
2008-03-18
HILLARY Clinton said the Iraq war may end up costing Americans $1 trillion and further strain the economy, as she made her case for a prompt US troop pullout from a war "we cannot win".

This week marks the fifth anniversary of the US invasion of Iraq, but voters now say the economy is their top issue in the campaign for the November presidential election.

Senator Clinton, the former first lady who is trying to convince voters she has foreign policy gravitas, criticised both her rival for the Democratic presidential nomination Senator Barack Obama, and the Republicans' choice, Senator John McCain. She said the war has sapped US military and economic strength, damaged US national security, taken the lives of nearly 4000 Americans and left thousands wounded.

"Our economic security is at stake," she said. "Taking into consideration the long-term costs of replacing equipment and providing medical care for troops and survivors' benefits for their families, the war in Iraq could ultimately cost well over $1 trillion."
It's the first time she's ever OVER-estimated health care costs.
It has already cost $500 billion.

Senator Clinton said that while Senator Obama insists he will withdraw US troops in Iraq within 16 months of taking office, his former foreign policy adviser, Samantha Power, had said he might not follow through on the pledge. "In uncertain times, we cannot afford uncertain leadership," Senator Clinton said.

Senator Obama, who routinely scolds Senator Clinton for having voted for a 2002 Senate resolution that authorised the war, fired back. "I think Senator Clinton has a lot of chutzpah, as they say, to in some way to suggest that I'm the person who has not been clear about my positions on Iraq. I have been opposed to this war from the start," he told PBS.

Senator McCain, who has clinched the Republican presidential nomination, drew fire from Senator Clinton as he visited Iraq as part of a Middle East and Europe swing this week that he hopes will remind Americans of his national security credentials.

She accused Senator McCain of joining President George W. Bush in pushing a "stay the course" policy that would keep US troops in Iraq for 100 years. "They both want to keep us tied to another country's civil war, a war we cannot win," she said. "That in a nutshell is the Bush/McCain Iraq policy. Don't learn from your mistakes, repeat them."

Senator Clinton said if elected she would convene military advisors and ask them to develop a plan to begin bringing US troops home within 60 days of taking office next January.

Senator McCain is a big backer of President Bush's troop build-up in Iraq, credited for slowing the death toll there. He told CNN that if Senator Clinton started bringing home troops, "al Qaeda wins".
Posted by:tipper

#14  #8 I see this as a Freudian slip, which amounts to "We cannot win." She's not talking about the Iraq occupation.

Ever wonder if she's talking about the Iraqi Occupation but actually the "we" in question refers to the anti-war folks. Or even worse to the anti-American element.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2008-03-18 16:01  

#13  Personally, I don't care what traitors like Mrs. Shag-the-Intern think. She's a proven liar, owned by the Chinese, and not someone I would trust to tell me the house is on fire without verification.

Honestly, the Clintons remind me more and more of movie gimmicks like Jason and Freddy. The movies are pointless because the bad guys are unkillable, no matter what you do. Stupid, pointless and a waste of time.

The sooner people realize just how irrelevant they are, the sooner they will fade away, gathering dust in a closet. Separate closets...since Bill's would need interns.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2008-03-18 14:25  

#12  It doesn't really matter, Remoteman, since our current Social Security and Medicare/Medicaid obligations are already slated to bankrupt us unless they become rescue nets for the very poor instead of entitlements for thee and me. What's a few more bankruptcies under the circumstances? ;-)
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-03-18 13:25  

#11  Wars and war spending are temporary events. No doubt Iraq is causing a spike in Federal spending. But entitlement programs, like those both Hillary and Obama propose, (and the one Bush stupidley enacted) are perpetual. Thus, her solutions will do far more to bankrupt this country than anything the war has done/will do.
Posted by: Remoteman   2008-03-18 13:19  

#10  I'm still waiting for the "Your kids must become wards of the state because it reinforces family values" speech.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-03-18 11:16  

#9  "Our economic security is at stake," she said.

My thoughts exactly, Bobby. More of this moronic '50s ad agency "framing" b*llsh*t. See, we worked in the word "security"!

Expect "family security", "health care security", etc. to follow.
Posted by: Excalibur   2008-03-18 11:05  

#8  I see this as a Freudian slip, which amounts to "We cannot win." She's not talking about the Iraq occupation.

And she is using the royal "We".

As in, "We cannot win against Obama."
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-03-18 08:54  

#7  "...the war in Iraq could ultimately cost well over $1 trillion."


If she was talking instead about her health care plan, do you think we'd hear her complain about it?
Posted by: Raj   2008-03-18 08:12  

#6  Dhimocrats, party of surrender and appeasement combined with higher taxes and socialism.

What isn't there to love about 'em?
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-03-18 06:44  

#5  "Our economic security is at stake," she said.

Clever. Linking her position with the new number one concern of the people. I guess we can't afford to win the war!
Posted by: Bobby   2008-03-18 06:14  

#4  Meanwhile, the Six O'Clock news last night featured a piece on how Iraqis polled thought they were better off now, and would be still better off next year. Fortunately, the Dems don't watch the news.

Not surprisingly, 73% of Iraqis polled want the US out of Iraq, but only 38% want them out now. Not that far apart from the US, I think.
Posted by: Bobby   2008-03-18 06:12  

#3  Can't never did! The attitude of losers everywhere.
Posted by: Cherelet Panda1987   2008-03-18 02:11  

#2  gotta love how they keep trying to top each other with a shorter timeline for pulling out. Pretty soon, they'll be promising to pull out, retroactively to 2003.

Meanwhile the troops continues their successful efforts
Posted by: Frank G   2008-03-18 02:10  

#1  Good Dhimmi, good dhimmi. Keep it up, loser.
Posted by: www   2008-03-18 01:34  

00:00