You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Cheney comes to Mideast with “rich agenda”
2008-03-17
WASHINGTON - Vice President Dick Cheney left on Sunday for the Middle East to raise concerns about high oil prices, push Israeli-Palestinian peace talks, and seek support for Iraq, where war began five years ago this week. Cheney, who has strong ties with leaders in the Middle East, will visit Oman, Saudi Arabia, Jerusalem, the Palestinian territories, and Turkey during a nine-day trip to the region.

“Clearly, our ongoing efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan will be discussed,” John Hannah, national security adviser to Cheney, told reporters. “Middle East peace, Iran, the situation in Syria, Lebanon, the violence in Gaza, energy -- it’s a very long list and rich agenda.”

Cheney will reinforce the message from visits by President George W. Bush in January and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice earlier this month, in a stepped-up diplomatic push for Israelis and Palestinians to move forward on peace efforts dealt a blow by violence in Gaza and Israel.

“The mood has deteriorated incredibly in the last six weeks since the president was there,” Jon Alterman, director of the Middle East program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said. “From the outside it’s very hard to see that Secretary Rice was able to even arrest the slide let alone get things moving forward. My guess is the vice president will be able to arrest the slide if not necessarily put things on track.”

In Saudi Arabia, Cheney will discuss energy with King Abdullah as record-high oil prices strain the US economy, but he was not expected to repeat the call by Bush for OPEC to increase production. “I’m not sure he’ll seek anything more than a good and thorough discussion about the current situation in the global energy markets,” a senior administration official said.
Posted by:Steve White

#2  "The mood has deteriorated incredibly since the last time the President was here" > As already reported, many "moderate" or pro-US/Western Muslim + Arab Govts do NOT WANT IRAN TO HAVE NUKE WEAPONS. 2008 US POTUS ELEX POSTURING = CAMPAIGN WAFFLISM > Amer's Aram-Muslim ME Allies are interpreting as "NO REGIME CHANGE IN RADICAL IRAN" + that the US will likely downsize iff not completely pullout from IRAQ-ME iff a Dem wins 2008. ALSO READ AS > POST-DUBYA/JAN 2009 THE NEW ADMIN = USA WILL LEAVE A WEAK IRAQI DEMOCRATIC GOVT IN PLACE, MIL UNSUPPOR OR IN ALTERN ONLY PARTIALLY SUPPOR BY A MUCH REDUCED US MILFOR PRESENCE, EITHER OF WHICH IS LIKELY TO BE ADVANTAGEOUS TO NUCLEARIZING IRAN + RADICAL INSURGENTS.

FOX this Guam AM > showed film montage of HILLARY being in favor of sending small special units agz insurgents, plus proclaiming that she will "STICK" wid her WAR-ENDING PLAN WHICH CALLS FOR REDUCING THE US MILFOR PRESENCE IN IRAQ-ME BY 10,000 sldiers PER MONTH, AND WID THE US PRESENCE [Advisors?]ELIMINATED COMPLETELY IN ROUGHLY ONE YEAR??? Unfortunately for HILLARY = HILLARY's WITHDRAWAL PLAN, Clinton advisor WESLEY CLARK believes the situation in Iraq + Afghani belies a realistic US need for maintaining a large = "sufficient" US combat presence, + ORALLY PROCLAIMED TO BE NOT IN FAVOR OF A TOTAL + UNILATER COMPLETE US WITHDRAWAL IFF HILLARY OR A DEM WINS IN 2008.

Also from FOX > Analyst DAN SENOR > despite their rhetoric for withdrawal, argued that ALL THE POTUS CANDIDATES, INCLUDING HILLARY + OBAMA, HAVE INDIC A WILLINGNESS TO CHANGE THEIR OPTIONS ACCORDING TO SITUATIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN IRAQ-ME, + THAT IN REALITY AMER SHOULD NOT BE SURPRISED TO SEE A CONTINUED US MIL PRESENCE = US TROOPS IN THE ME FOR ANOTHER DECADE/TEN YEARS [2018]NO MATTER WHOM GOP-DEM WINS THE WH IN 2008.

2008-2018 [beyond?] > iff there is a HIDDEN IMAM/MAHDI as per OSAMA + MOUD, etc, the same in belief should be able to de facto defeat or destroy the anti-Islamist/Radicalist US-Allied presence in Iraq-ME regardless of enemy troop levels, MORESO IFF US MILFOR LEVELS DE FACTO REDUXES TO UNDER 100,000 bwteen FEB 2009 - DEC 2010 [Median 40,000-70,000].

REGARDLESS OF US-PER SE TROOP LEVELS, IMO RADICAL ISLAM CAN'T WAIT UNTIL 2018 - already stretching to last thru 2012. IMO THIS IS A SUBTLE OR COVERT MEANING TO A RUSS ANALYST'S PREMISE THAT THE USA CAN ATTACK RUSSIA 2011-2015. Russ knows it may soon no longer be able to use Radical Islam as a timely or time-intensive hedge agz the USA-NATO, nor even to justify local anti-Islamist mil ventures in Russ former SSR's in Central Asia, Chechnya, etc.

2008-2010 > WILL RADICAL ISLAM INITIATE "AMER HIROSHIMA" OPTIONS TO ESCALATE-INDUCE GREAT POWERS CONFRONTATIONISM IN ORDER TO PRECLUDE REGIONAL-GLOBAL ISLAMIST MILITARY DEFEAT???
Again, 'twas what IMAMS-MAHDIS, MESSIAHS AND SAVIORS ETC., ARE FOR, CORRECT!?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-03-17 22:09  

#1  Good luck with that, no one is going to do anything for us. We are on our own and always have been.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2008-03-17 12:16  

00:00