You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
New Brit sniper rifle on duty against Talibunnies
2008-03-07
It is the latest weapon on the front line against the Taliban - the British Army's most powerful-ever sniper rifle, capable of killing with pinpoint accuracy from more than a mile away.

Yesterday the Army showed off its new Long Range Rifle, which has just entered service with combat units in Afghanistan to replace smaller and less powerful weapons. The £11million upgrade programme is part of a "renaissance" of the sniper tradition - which during the Cold War was largely relegated to the sidelines - as modern commanders rediscover the huge value of pinpoint fire from sharpshooters.

The new weapon, the L115A3, fires a heavier bullet to much longer ranges and has a state-of-the-art telescopic sight with twice the magnifying power of the old version. More than 500 are on order from the British manufacturers, Accuracy International.
It fires an 8.59 mm bullet, so it's not a .50 cal, but heavier than the 7.62 mm used previously by the Brits.
Since British forces moved into Helmand Province two years ago to take on the Taliban, demand for snipers has soared and 120 a year are now passing through the specialist training school at Warminster in Wiltshire. One said: "It's a huge step forward. I'll be using the new rifle in Afghanistan this summer.

"It's a little heavier to carry, but the extra power is worth it. The improved telescopic sight can cut through the heat haze, which was preventing us from spotting targets at longer ranges."

Sniping is proving a hugely-important tactic in Afghanistan, where the difficulty of fighting among maze-like compounds and thick vegetation necessitates attacking the enemy at long range. The controversy over so-called "collateral damage" from devastating airstrikes killing innocent civilians adds to the advantages of a pinpoint attack.

A senior officer at the Weapons Support School in Warminster said: "With the new rifle we now expect to be able to engage a target at 1,500 metres. With the old version it was about 1,000 metres. That makes a massive difference. You can keep the enemy at arm's length with snipers. Or you can have several of them firing simultaneously.

"It is devastating for an enemy's morale if a number of their fighters are suddenly shot at the same instant, and they can't even see where the firing is coming from. They tend to withdraw fast."

Training an infantryman to become a sniper can take up to a year, and only the most talented soldiers are allowed even to start the demanding courses. First a candidate must master the technical aspects of shooting, learning to judge the strength of the wind extremely accurately using a variety of clues, and to adjust aim accordingly. Just as importantly a sniper must learn to track his prey, move into position with extreme stealth, camouflage himself perfectly whether in natural cover or a battle-scarred city, and then disappear just as stealthily.

The senior officer said: "There is a long waiting list. Battalions are desperate to send soldiers here for training, and every soldier wants to be a sniper.

"They're held in extremely high regard. This new rifle will make them even more effective."
Similar article here.
Posted by:Steve White

#10  Dakota arms made a cheapo version of a .338 Lapua mag a few years ago called the longbough, it was going for a measley 6,000 USD back in 1998. And it didn't even have any field-time credentials.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-03-07 16:51  

#9  338 Lapua.

Best sniper round in the world.

My shoulder knows how damned hard they kick though. Sore when I fired a few at the range courtesy of our rich gun enthusiast who buys such exotic things. The rounds are not cheap, at least not for civilians.

Ballistically, its more accurate a round than the .50 BMG.

And I would not be surprised if they were using the Lapua loading. USSOCOM has been using them for a long time. It is allegedly designed for a headshot at 1000m.


Posted by: OldSpook   2008-03-07 13:05  

#8  I've heard of .338 magnum; the metric-to-normal conversion was messing me up. Thanks for straightening me out.
Posted by: Mike   2008-03-07 12:44  

#7  It's a .338 like their old sniper rifles. The Lapua magnum is an exotic chamber with very subtle differences on the outside. Their round is probably somewhere in between a .338 winchester mag and a .338 Lapua mag.
Posted by: bigjim-ky   2008-03-07 12:12  

#6  "totally overkill for North American hunting..."

But just right for Afghan hunting. They have extra large Bunnies there, ya know.

Posted by: Rupert Chaimp5657   2008-03-07 11:11  

#5  Some calibers are somewhat special in the accuracy department, and the .338 is one of 'em. Originally there were problems with the brass, that's where Lapua came in. The Lapua brass has both a thickness and hardness gradient that keeps them together under the high working pressures. Nice long range round, could have some use in African hunting, totally overkill for North American hunting...
Posted by: Glereth Hatfield8822   2008-03-07 10:34  

#4  Where did they get that oddball caliber? Who came up with 8.59mm, and why?

IIRC, it's 8.58mm, and its actual name is .338 lapua magnum (US designed, with military use in mind, from the get-go as a step above the universal .30/7,62 calibers), and this is an heavier caliber that has been favored by europeans for some time now (it's the caliber of the standard french army sniper rifle), and is popular with US shooters too.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2008-03-07 10:16  

#3  Calibers dictate the round. It is enigmatic indeed why .01 caliber can have such a night-and-day difference in bullets, but it does.

Amusingly, the Russians always wanted their equipment to be just slightly larger than their enemies. Theoretically, this would mean that they could use the enemy ammo, but the enemy couldn't use theirs.

But practically, it meant that their enemies' ammo would hit dead on, but the larger Russian stuff would be lucky to hit the broad side of a barn.

To make things loopy, different manufacturers using the same diameter bullet will sometimes give it a different caliber *name*, even though the bullets are the same diameter.

For example the .221 Fireball, .222 Remington and .223 Remington all use the same bullet diameter, but the cartridges are different lengths.

NATO gets around different bullet lengths by using the "x" designator. For example the 7.62x51 NATO round.

It helps to be really, really, really anal retentive if you are a bullet designer.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2008-03-07 09:58  

#2  Reach out, reach out and touch someone . . .

Where did they get that oddball caliber? Who came up with 8.59mm, and why?
Posted by: Mike   2008-03-07 09:18  

#1  "Head shot!"

/Unreal Tournament
Posted by: Frank G   2008-03-07 06:22  

00:00