You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
France pushing for focused NATO front against Taliban
2008-03-05
France, poised to expand its military commitment in Afghanistan, will push this week for a more focused allied plan to battle Taliban insurgents and rebuild the country, the French government said Tuesday. Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner “will express the need for the alliance to develop a true strategy in Afghanistan” when he meets in Brussels Thursday with foreign ministers at a North Atlantic Treaty Organization meeting.
A French general must be in charge, naturally ...
Kouchner will be attending an informal meeting of NATO foreign ministers where he is expected to discuss FranceÂ’s ambitions with Canadian counterpart Maxime Bernier. Canada has waged a high-pressure diplomatic effort to convince NATO allies, and in particular France, to come up with the 1,000 troops Canada says it needs to continue its mission beyond 2009 in the dangerous Kandahar region of Afghanistan.

The Paris newspaper Le Monde reported last week that French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who will announce France’s plans at a NATO summit next month in Bucharest, wants to send the additional troops to the east to fight with Americans, rather than to the south with the Canadians. Pascale Andreani, senior spokeswoman for the French Foreign Ministry, refused to comment on the report but said France isn’t ignoring Canada’s request. “We have certainly heard the call of Canada,” she said at a news conference today. “As I said to you, we are in the process of preparing a decision that will be announced in Bucharest.”

She also noted that France has already recently boosted its efforts in Afghanistan, sending Mirage fighter jets to Kandahar and expanding efforts to train the Afghan National Army. French officials stress repeatedly that Canadians should recognize the country has more than 15,000 troops in various peacekeeping and peacemaking missions overseas, including about 2,000 in Afghanistan.

Some analysts have suggested that France, which has historically tried to push the image of French “greatness” abroad, would rather fight alongside American troops in the east than play a junior role to Canada in the south because Canada is a middle power that gets almost no media attention in Europe. But one official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said France’s interest in locating more troops in the east has far more to do with operational and logistical issues and less to do with enhancing French prestige.
"Non, non, certainement pas!"
Posted by:Fred

#5  ION EUROPE, PRAVDA > ARMENIA UNDER ASSAULT/
ATTACK BY ORANGE AGENTS [read- US/NATO]. The Florida Orange Revolution???

Also, FREEREPUBLIC > iff one is going to die, don't die in a certain French town/parish lest vous be charged heavily for dying widout local permission + attempting to be buried in the town/parish cemetary where there is no more available space. LOCAL FRENCH CITIZENS MAY NO LONGER DIE IN THEIR HOMETOWNS = BIRTHPLACE WIDOUT PERMISSION???

GERMANY gets a break from bad press.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-03-05 19:36  

#4  If the French are looking for publicity, they won't find it with the Americans unless they bring their own PR team. There are 10 times as many Americans in the east than Canadians in the south and we hear less of the US efforts. Plus, it seems a lot easier to operate with the Canadians due to language alone (Newfies excepted).

BTW, anyone know if the Marines sent to the south are operating with the British or Canadians?
Posted by: ed   2008-03-05 14:56  

#3  Well said, VanC!
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2008-03-05 13:40  

#2  What Vanc said so succinctly. Except for the being a Canuck part. ;-) Oh, and if French troops were to fight alongside the Canadians in the south, I suspect Canadian efforts would somehow get more attention in Europe.
Posted by: trailing wife    2008-03-05 06:49  

#1  As a canuck:

Who cares who gets credit? Get the job done.

Want a French general? Fine. With risk comes responsibility.

Want to send troops to the east? OK. Just send the spares to where the fighting is actually taking place.

Want to enhance French prestige? OWN UP to your NATO obligations.

Logistical problems in the south? Send helicopters, not Mirages. We can ship a dozen F18s on a moments notice, but our Chinooks are decades old, and Boeing won't fast-track new ones. I hear EADS is now flush with cash. How about a few choppers in return?

Logistical problems in Afghanistan was a "given" from the start. To see NATO floundering 7 years later is an embarrassment.
Posted by: Vanc   2008-03-05 03:25  

00:00