| Submit your comments on this article | |
| Home Front: Politix | |
| Obama's mystery Captain in Afghanistan unveiled | |
| 2008-02-24 | |
| The Army captain, a West Point graduate, did a tour in a hot area of eastern Afghanistan from the Summer of 2003 through Spring 2004. Prior to deployment the Captain -- then a Lieutenant -- took command of a rifle platoon at Fort Drum. When he took command, the platoon had 39 members, but -- in ones and twos -- 15 members of the platoon were re-assigned to other units. He knows of 10 of those 15 for sure who went to Iraq, and he suspects the other five did as well. The platoon was sent to Afghanistan with 24 men. "We should have deployed with 39," he told me, "we should have gotten replacements. But we didn't. And that was pretty consistent across the battalion." He adds that maybe a half-dozen of the 15 were replaced by the Fall of 2003, months after they arrived in Afghanistan, but never all 15. As for the weapons and humvees, there are two distinct periods in this, as he explains -- before deployment, and afterwards. At Fort Drum, in training, "we didn't have access to heavy weapons or the ammunition for the weapons, or humvees to train before we deployed." What ammunition? 40 mm automatic grenade launcher ammunition for the MK-19, and ammunition for the .50 caliber M-2 machine gun ("50 cal.") "We weren't able to train in the way we needed to train," he says. When the platoon got to Afghanistan they had three days to learn. They also didn't have the humvees they were supposed to have both before deployment and once they were in Afghanistan, the Captain says. "We should have had 4 up-armored humvees," he said. "We were supposed to. But at most we had three operable humvees, and it was usually just two." In 2003 no one had up-armored humvees. So what did they do? "To get the rest of the platoon to the fight," he says, "we would use Toyota Hilux pickup trucks or unarmored flatbed humvees." Sometimes with sandbags, sometimes without. Also in Afghanistan they had issues getting parts for their MK-19s and their 50-cals. Getting parts or ammunition for their standard rifles was not a problem. "It was very difficult to get any parts in theater," he says, "because parts are prioritized to the theater where they were needed most -- so they were going to Iraq not Afghanistan." "The purpose of going after the Taliban was not to get their weapons," he said, but on occasion they used Taliban weapons. Sometimes AK-47s, and they also mounted a Soviet-model DShK (or "Dishka") on one of their humvees instead of their 50 cal. The Captain has spoken to Sen. Obama, he says, but this anecdote was relayed to Obama through an Obama staffer. I find that Obama's anecdote checks out. Some are quibbling about whether or not the "commander in chief" can be held responsible for how well our soldiers are being equipped, since Congress provides the funding for the military, but the Pentagon (and ultimately President Bush) are in charge of the funding mechanism. I might suggest those on the blogosphere upset about this story would be better suited directing their ire at those responsible for this problem, which is certainly not new. That is, if they actually care about the men and women bravely serving our country at home and abroad.
| |
| Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC |
| #2 Those 10-15 may well have back up SpecOps &/or the Peshmerga. Ft. Drum = 10th Mountain and we were taking on Ansar al Islam in the mountains of Kurdistan at that time. |
| Posted by: lotp 2008-02-24 21:53 |
| #1 2003 was also when the US went into Iraq to topple Saddam's government. Funny how that got left out... |
| Posted by: Pappy 2008-02-24 21:44 |