You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Archdruid Was Right
2008-02-20
Feisal Abdul Rauf
Editorial by an Islamic apologist in the Washington Post.
The addition of Sharia law to "the law of the land" complements, rather than undermines, existing legal frameworks. Williams was right. It's time for Britain to integrate aspects of Islamic law.
That's just the blurb from the article. Read the rest if you've a mind -- the usual arguments.

If we could export stoopid we'd have a trade surplus. If the Muslim world could export duplicitous they wouldn't need oil.
Posted by:Fred

#3  The population of the UK is about 60.8 million, according to the CIA World Factbook. Muslims comprise about 1.6 million, or about 2.6%. WTF??!!! The government of Britain are a bunch of wusses is they are tyrannized and/or intimidated by 3% of the population. Let it be a good disturbing lesson to us here in the US. We better learn, and learn quickly.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2008-02-20 15:49  

#2  "That doesn't prevent British Muslims from practicing aspects of Sharia that don't conflict with British law, or from seeking changes in British law."

It’s not like it’s some kind of Islamic secret or anything but Feisal boy tips his cards right off the get go. Bottom line - Sharia law is an “all or nothing proposition”. If you hadn’t noticed, once you’re in the club, adherents are not allowed to practice Sharia in an ale’ carte fashion. Perhaps you’ve heard of that whole “Apostate” thingy? Make no mistake, introduction of certain “aspects” from Sharia law is the first step in a calculated path for incremental changes in established western law. The goal is to establish enclaves that are eventually governed by a completely different set of laws. Something the multi- culturists seem incapable of wrapping their little pin-heads around.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2008-02-20 10:45  

#1   It's not just a Muslim issue.
Spengler recently summarized the Archdruid's position thus:
Stripped of casuistry, he proposed that Muslim women subject to forced marriages, genital mutilation, or domestic violence should be handed over to Muslim religious courts, rather than be offered the protection of English Common Law. To my knowledge, this is the first time that one of EuropeÂ’s spiritual leaders has proposed to abandon innocent victims to their fate.

Archbishop Dr Rowan Williams, to be sure, has a point. But he should have stated plainly what he really thinks. What he wanted to say is more or less: "To protect a few hundred or a few thousand colored ladies, the English state will have to put its big boots on, kick down the doors of Muslim homes, trample through Muslim living rooms, tear up the fabric of Muslim communities, and disrupt the social order. Why not turn such cases over to [Muslim] religious courts and wash our hands of them?" I reiterate: this is satanic hypocrisy.

If decent and well-meaning men like Dr Williams are so afraid of communal violence as to abandon the founding principles of common law and Judeo-Christian ethics, it is long past time to debate the fine points.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2008-02-20 01:58  

00:00