You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Archdruid: too intellectual to lead?
2008-02-20
Or just a dumbass?
We report. You decide.
Mark Rice-Oxley
When it comes to leadership in the Church of England, the former Bishop of Norwich once reportedly said: "If you want to lead someone in this part of the world, find out where they're going. And walk in front of them." Rowan Williams, who celebrates five years as Archbishop of Canterbury next week, could never be accused of doing that.
Then he's not a leader, is he?

There are other ways of leading, of course. For example, you can lay out a destination, explain to everyone else why it's desirable to go there, then blaze the trail. Or even just head in that direction with the rest of them, each doing a part in the trailblazing.

But if you simply decide on a destination and you're either unwilling or incapable of explaining why you go there, or if it's the wrong destination, and you head for it, you're not leading. You're wandering.

And if you have no destination at all, you're just fond of dithering and vaporing and ajusting the lighting so your forehead looks higher, you're not even making it to the "wandering" category. You're a poseur.
Since he took over the delicate task of leading the Anglican church's 77 million strong worldwide communion, Dr. Williams has repeatedly found himself marching against the current of public opinion, government policy, or both.
They call him the Wanderer,
The Wanderer,
He roams aroun' and aroun' an' aroun',
Until he gets dizzy.
There was his criticism of British involvement in the Iraq war, which put the government's nose out of joint. There were proclamations on issues ranging from stem-cell research, abortion, and the criminal-justice system to America's foreign policy record and the economic iniquities of globalization. But nothing has troubled England quite as much as his remarks this month on the inevitability of certain elements of sharia law in Britain. Sharia, he said, offered a way of arbitration, particularly in marital or family disputes, that could provide an alternative to divorce courts. "Certain conditions of sharia are already recognized in our society and under our law, so it is not as if we are bringing in an alien and rival system," he said.
"Vogue. Vogue. Strike a pose..."
The comments ignited a furor that has seen British tabloids call for his resignation and members of his own hierarchy publicly disown him. For some Britons, Williams's remarks came as an unwanted reminder of the forward march of Islam in their midst. For some in the church, there was a sense of outrage that Muslims would get special dispensation, while Christians get no such favors in secular Britain.

The episode says as much about the personality of the archbishop, say observers, as it does about the knee-jerk tabloid proclivity to judge first and inquire later.

Part of the problem was not what was said (sharia justice has been arbitrating in civil affairs of British Muslims for 25 years) but the way it was communicated. The sentiments were woven into a lofty speech that was not easily boiled down into snappy headlines.

Therein lies the conflict: Williams is a public intellectual, ponderous, studious, and given to rich, convoluted peroration, which doesn't always sit happily in the era of sound-bite journalism...

Posted by:Fred

#2  You're not a leader if no one is following you. Getting folks to follow you is the one real mark of a leader (not that that makes them good - Adolph had a lot of followers straight to hell). I don't see too many following the Big Druid.
Posted by: Spot   2008-02-20 08:22  

#1  Or just a dumbass?

If ignorance is bliss, then this guy would have died of an orgasm long ago.
Posted by: gorb   2008-02-20 01:28  

00:00