Submit your comments on this article | |
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia | |
Russia Wants Multinational Arms Control | |
2008-02-11 | |
![]() Ivanov also told a gathering of the world's top defense officials that Russia's burgeoning economic power does not represent a threat to other countries, but the West has to get used to Moscow's growing influence in world affairs. He said Russia expects to be among the world's five biggest economies by 2020, but "we do not aim to buy the entire Old World with our petrodollars." "Getting richer, Russia will not pose a threat to the security of other countries. Yet our influence on global processes will continue to grow," he said. "More than half of Russian foreign trade is with the EU, so the Russians have already come - not with tanks, not with missiles, but with joint trade."
Though Moscow and Washington have been at odds recently over an American plan to position parts of a missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic, Ivanov said Russia and the U.S. needed to work closely together to combat nuclear proliferation. He suggested that old bilateral treaties between the U.S. and Russia on nuclear arms - like the Salt 1 agreement - should be replaced by multilateral agreements. "It is imperative to ensure that the provisions of such a regime should be legally binding so that, in due course, it would really become possible to shift to the control over nuclear weapons and the process of their gradual reduction on a multilateral basis," he said. Involvement of all major nuclear nations, he said, "is the essence of our proposals related to the anti-missile defense and to the intermediate and short-range missiles." | |
Posted by:Steve White |
#3 Crap. How about you guys stop selling designs to anybody with two rubles to rub together, huh? |
Posted by: mojo 2008-02-11 11:08 |
#2 Don't automatically dismiss this, despite the usual Russian perfidy. Because Russia also acts heavily out of self-interest, it also has no problem with preventing nuclear proliferation, for example; but it has a very different approach to things. For example, the US wants to prevent Iran from getting nuclear material to begin with. This is problematic, since Iran has uranium mines, and the only thing preventing them from enriching their own is technology, and the threat of war. From the Russian point of view, the US's approach is unrealistic. So their attitude is to give the low level uranium to Iran suitable for nuclear fuel, but on condition that Iran give back its depleted fuel, and the small amount of plutonium it contains. By Russian logic, this would deprive Iran of any reason to enrich its own, and the Russians could easily tell if they were trying to cheat. It would also save Iran so much money that there would be internal debate on "wasting" it to enrich their own, instead of spending it on other things. And while the Russians think that the US in stepping on its toes, resulting in the Iranians wanting to enrich their own, just to snub the US; the US's attitude is that Russia has been too generous with the carrot, undermining the US with its stick. Recently, however, there might have been a change in the Russian opinion, because the Iranians are making and testing missiles suitable for carrying nuclear weapons. This changes everything, and the Russians are becoming far less trusting of their Iranian "friends". And while, at times, Russians can be quite friendly, they do not take to being double crossed very well. |
Posted by: Anonymoose 2008-02-11 09:36 |
#1 SPACEWAR/TOPIX > RUSSIA NOT SEEKING CLASH WITH WEST BUT WILL PUSH/USE ITS WEIGHT YO AHIEVE ITS AGENDA. |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2008-02-11 02:00 |