You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Pelosi calls Iraq a 'failure'
2008-02-10
"working hard to earn your disrespect!" Actually, I'm convinced she and Harry are working hard to see if negative approval ratings are possible
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said twice Sunday that Iraq “is a failure,” adding that President Bush’s troop surge has “not produced the desired effect.”
"which is the retreat and withdrawal of our troops in defeat"
“The purpose of the surge was to create a secure time for the government of Iraq to make the political change to bring reconciliation to Iraq,” Pelosi said on CNN’s “Late Edition.” “They have not done that.”

The speaker hastened to add: “The troops have succeeded, God bless them.”
"oops! Of course I support them! Just get out of Berkeley!"
PelosiÂ’s harsh verdict is a reminder of the dilemma for Democrats as they head into this fallÂ’s presidential and congressional elections: They need to make the case that the country needs to depart from the direction set by Bush. Yet they donÂ’t want to look like naysayers at a time when Iraq has become more stable, albeit still violent.
like DC
Republican strategists say one of their few chances to avoid a blowout in November is to paint Democrats as defeatists.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) sparked a furious response from the right last year when he said the Iraq war “is lost.”

Bush announced in September that the surge policy of additional troops would allow a gradual reduction in forces as a “return on success.” Improvements in Iraq helped revive the presidential campaign of Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), now the front-runner for the Republican nomination.

Shortly after Pelosi spoke on Sunday with Defense Secretary Robert Gates in Iraq, a suicide bomber killed more than 20 civilians at a checkpoint north of Baghdad, the U.S. military reported.
"timed to perfection, Achmed!"
Pelosi’s comment came during a discussion of her call for “the redeployment of our troops out of Iraq.” Anchor Wolf Blitzer asked: “Are you not worried, though, that all the gains that have been achieved over the past year might be lost?”

“There haven't been gains, Wolf,” the speaker replied. “The gains have not produced the desired effect, which is the reconciliation of Iraq. This is a failure. This is a failure. The troops have succeeded, God bless them. We owe them the greatest debt of gratitude for their sacrifice, their patriotism, and for their courage and to their families as well.

“But they deserve better than the policy of a war without end, a war that could be 20 years or longer. And Secretary Gates just testified in the last 24 hours to Congress that this next year in Iraq and Afghanistan are going to cost $170 billion.

“Afghanistan is not settled because the president took his eye off the ball and took the full attention that should have been in Afghanistan, and shifted some of that to Iraq, a war without end, without a plan, without a reason to go in, without a plan to win, without a strategy to leave. This is a disaster … we cannot perpetuate.”
Posted by:Frank G

#8  wonder how many voter in her districts have been too iraq , there now or going soon?
Posted by: sinse   2008-02-10 22:41  

#7  There's the solution P2K. 160 acres and a homestead in Arabia.
Posted by: ed   2008-02-10 21:16  

#6  But they deserve better than the policy of a war without end, a war that could be 20 years or longer.

Nancy, you missed the history class about the US expansion across the continent that resulted in one or more conflicts with the insurgents natives that lasted nearly a century?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-02-10 20:45  

#5  Pelosi Iraq calls Iraq Pelosi a failure There. Fixed it.
Posted by: GK   2008-02-10 20:23  

#4  But they deserve better than the policy of a war without end, a war that could be 20 years or longer. And Secretary Gates just testified in the last 24 hours to Congress that this next year in Iraq and Afghanistan are going to cost $170 billion.

This is the critical comment. She is conceding Osama's point that America is a paper tiger that can be defeated by simply out waiting it. Pelosi does not have the will to victory.

The American people have to have the alternatives and the choice made explicit. Victory with McCain, whenever, however or defeat with Obama/Clinton/Pelosi/Reid now and a new attack on America sooner or later. That is how McCain will have to frame the issue to win the election. If he does, it will go a long way to winning the war.

His failure to frame the war appropriately is one of Bush's great failings and one reason he has so little domestic support.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2008-02-10 20:18  

#3  I could see how some people might take her seriously -- she IS an expert in failure.
Posted by: DMFD   2008-02-10 20:06  

#2  Geeze... they are so desperate to stay in power and do anything to oppose Bush that they will do pure treason and sedition.

Against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-02-10 18:29  

#1  There is nothing under the sun that Democrats won't say or deny to get power, and nothing that Republicans can do that won't be criticised in some fashion. This woman is living proof of the worthlessness of McCain reaching across the aisle. She woukld sacrifice American resolve and reputation in the world in a second for advantage, and she has no idea how to actually deal with the barbarians that surround us. Like most of her ilk, she thinks they are just like her, just charmingly different in only superficial ways. When confronted with repeated proofs that they are not, she simply fails to comprehend......
Posted by: NoMoreBS   2008-02-10 18:07  

00:00