You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Berkeley Mayor 'Apologizes' To Marines Over Recruiting Center Flap
2008-02-08
BERKELEY, Calif. -- As six Republican senators devised a plan to yank $2.3 million in federal funding for Berkeley programs, the mayor of the famously liberal city apologized Wednesday for his hard stance against a Marine recruiting center.

Two City Council members vowed to soften their stance as well. At their Tuesday council meeting, leaders will discuss scrapping a letter that might be perceived as targeting the center or the Marines. The letter said that the recruiting center was not welcome on Shattuck Avenue and that the Marines were uninvited and unwelcome intruders.

"That letter will probably be pulled back and maybe more moderate language will be put in place which is appropriate I think," said Berkeley mayor Tom Bates. "Subtly stated in the resolution is perhaps an impugning of the soldiers fighting for us in Iraq and other places," Berkeley City Councilman Laurie Capitelli. "And that was never the intention but that really needs to be cleared up. As I walked to my car that night I realized I regretted it and I had made a mistake."
Subtly stated? Didn't seem to be subtle to me. If I get it, lady, it ain't subtle.
Bates said the city didn't mean to offend anyone in the armed forces and the focus should have been on the war not the troops. "There's really no correlation between federal funds for schools, water ferries and police communications systems and the council's actions, for God's sake," said Bates, a retired U.S. Army captain. "We apologize for any offense to any families of anyone who may serve in Iraq. We want them to come home and be safe at home."
That's not an apology.

An apology is, "we apologize for our actions for we were wrong, and we ask you to forgive us."
The letter was originally approved in January and has not been sent.

City officials said they got a flood of e-mails, many asking them to reconsider their position. Councilmembers have said they would replace the "intruder item" with words expressing their support for the troops but not the war in Iraq.
That can't be done. If you don't support what our troops are doing, you don't support the troops.
The Republican plan would give the funds, intended for a school lunch program, UC Berkeley and ferry service, to the Marines instead. "Patriotic American taxpayers won't sit quietly while Berkeley insults our brave Marines," said one of the senators.

The recruiting center opened about a year ago and quickly became a target of anti-war protesters including the group Code Pink. Last week the council passed resolutions giving Code Pink a place to park out front. Some have said that meant the city giving was giving the group a place to continuously protest the Marines.

"What we're doing is we're announcing a bill that we intend to get on the floor to strip transportation from the city of Berkeley," said East Bay Republican Assemblyman Guy Houston. "What they have done in Berkeley is they have set aside a parking spot and in my opinion a public right of way, a public transportation corridor, specifically for a private organization -- in this case Code Pink -- to harass and annoy the United States Marine Corps and their recruiting efforts. We think that playing around and having an agenda with the public right of way is subject to ramifications. There is $2.3 million in proposition 1B transportation dollars. We think that should be in jeopardy."

Others on the Berkeley City Council seemed quite firm on their stance, NBC11's Christie Smith reported.

Sen. Barbara Boxer and Rep. Barbara Lee said they plan to fight the Republican bill.
Figures, this is their base of support.
Code Pink announced they would have what they called a "24-hour peace-in" leading up to Tuesday's city council meeting. They will be camping out but will have a lot of company. A group of pro-troop protesters will also be there.

"I was under the impression that we have the right of free speech," said Xanne Joi of Code Pink. "To me, I thought free speech meant you get to say what you want without recrimination."
You're wrong, 'Xanne'. You have the right to speak. I have the right to recriminate.
Berkeley City Councilman Gordon Wozniak extended an olive branch to the Marines. He went to breakfast with a recruiter Thursday morning. "Berkeley is supposed to celebrate diversity and free speech and we welcome homeless people here. We welcome illegal immigrants. We give them sanctuary. We should welcome the Marines. I mean they're basically dedicating their lives to protect their country." Wozniak said he does not support the harsh language of the letter to the Marines originally authorized by the city.

Ann Cooper with the Berkeley Unified School District wants both sides to play nice. "Senators sitting 3,000 miles away are trying to take food away from the children of Berkeley," said Cooper. "Why? Because the Marines and the city aren't playing nice -- and that's just not OK."
Posted by:Steve White

#23  The Berkeley Police allowed the burned-out brained hippies to chain themselves to private property for hours. That denied the private citizens, as well as the Marine recruiters inside to exercise their freedoms and civil rights.

I hope that the six senator bring this up and stay with it in the Senate to bring up the actions of the City of Berkeley. They may not win, but they will exposed these hypocrite Lefties for what they are and that they are Fascists.

I went through 4 years of this crap at UC Berkeley with the SDS types, and I still feel the bile in my throat from the actions of these people.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2008-02-08 23:30  

#22  I mean they're basically dedicating their lives to protect their country.

A textbook example of damning with faint praise.
Posted by: xbalanke   2008-02-08 18:13  

#21  As I understand it, some transportation people, couldn't tell if it was state or federal, wants to withhold funding for Berkeley's higways in the town. That is because the free parking space allotted to Code Pink was a state or federal location and they were miffed that the city decided to determine who could park on that spot over and above all other state or federal tax payers. A story I had only about 15 seconds to read yesterday. Wish I had more time to read it to find out what level those people were on in the government.
Posted by: www   2008-02-08 16:14  

#20  Hudna
Posted by: Mullah Richard   2008-02-08 14:30  

#19  at last, true context for the line,

"tell it to the Marines!"
Posted by: Querent   2008-02-08 13:07  

#18  "I was under the impression that we have the right of free speech," said Xanne Joi of Code Pink. "To me, I thought free speech meant you get to say what you want without recrimination."

Translation:

"Consequences? Nobody told us there'd be consequences!"
Posted by: charger   2008-02-08 12:16  

#17  Bates said the city didn't mean to offend anyone in the armed forces

No, no, of course not. We love "intruders". We usually give them taxpayer funded health care, housing, education and drivers licenses... in Spanish!

"There's really no correlation between federal funds for schools, water ferries and police communications systems and the council's actions, for God's sake,"

Except that the federal government has chosen to entrust the spending of its money to the council.

"Berkeley is supposed to celebrate diversity and free speech and we welcome homeless people here. We welcome illegal immigrants. We give them sanctuary. We should welcome the Marines. I mean they're basically dedicating their lives to protect their country."

Wow. Yeah. I hadn't thought of it that way. They are basically dedicating their lives to protect their country. Just like homeless people and illegal immigrants.
Posted by: Excalibur   2008-02-08 10:44  

#16  Thanks Senators. It's working. But we wouldn't want any 'poor' chiddrens in Beserkley going hungry. So instead of subsidizing a gourmet restaurant, provide rations in kind to the spoiled brats -- MREs.
Posted by: GK   2008-02-08 10:35  

#15  Let 'em eat Meyer lemon éclairs with huckleberry coulis!
Posted by: tu3031   2008-02-08 10:17  

#14  RD I live in a little Conservative Ghetto 15 miles SE of Beserkeley.
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2008-02-08 10:13  

#13  "Senators sitting 3,000 miles away are trying to take food away from the children of Berkeley," said Cooper. "Why? Because the Marines and the city aren't playing nice -- and that's just not OK."

One earmark provides gourmet organic lunches to schools in the Berkeley School District. While our Marines are making due with MREs of Sloppy Joe and Chili with Beans, the organization Chez Panisse is getting federal tax dollars to design meals that promote "environmental harmony." Chez Panisse's menu features "Comté cheese soufflé with mâche salad," "Meyer lemon éclairs with huckleberry coulis" and "Chicory salad with creamy anchovy vinaigrette and olive toast."

That's my Fed tax dollar buying the "poor children" a much better lunch than I get.
Posted by: KBK   2008-02-08 09:13  

#12  Yep, dealing with recruiting on campus.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-02-08 09:07  

#11  P2K - is that related to what I remember about the case involving military recruiters?

If recruiters can't be banned from universities without penalty, who should Beserkley expect to get away with it?
Posted by: Bobby   2008-02-08 08:47  

#10  ed, DoD won't even enforce the Solomon Amendment even though SCOTUS said the government had full rights to.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-02-08 08:07  

#9  2 million is chicken feed. The real damage will be done by the DOD programming R&D dollars away from UC Berkeley. The bright professors and grad students will follow the money. Does the DOD have the cojones?
Posted by: ed   2008-02-08 06:25  

#8  I like the in-line comment "If I get it, lady, it ain't subtle." Prety well describes my intersection with the rest of humanity. My two cents on the subject is beat these asses unmercifully and continuously for as long as necessary until they issue a REAL apology and stop acting as if they speak for everyone. And yes, leave the rest of California alone, but whack the hell out of Boxer and Pelosi over this until they too publicly denounce the fools in the Berley City Council. Practically speaking, this can be used for years, decades, maybe even longer (they are too stupid and self righteous to see that they are in error) or at least until we tire of it.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2008-02-08 06:09  

#7  My take is for our Repubs to jerk their funding inspite of what they do now.

If they [Repubs] play their cards right Di-Fi and Babs will have to go along!

GolfBravoUSMC, do you live in the Berkeley area?
Posted by: RD   2008-02-08 03:47  

#6  Click here to see another typical day in Beserkeley.
Posted by: GolfBravoUSMC   2008-02-08 02:49  

#5  Let me try to get this right. Bring the troops home, but they will be considered intruders if they are in Berkeley.
Posted by: www   2008-02-08 01:22  

#4  "I'm sorry if you misunderstood were offended by what we did."
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2008-02-08 01:22  

#3  Yank it. They're a cheap bunch.

Just leave Cal alone.
Posted by: mojo   2008-02-08 01:01  

#2  Free speech means that the government can't throw you in jail for disagreeing with it.
We shouldn't be giving federal money to any city for hoity-toity school lunch programs,especially Berkeley.
Posted by: Rambler   2008-02-08 00:33  

#1  Yank their funding anyway. Apparently they don't support what is needed to defend the bennies they want, therefore they get none.

You don't stand behind our troops, you sure as hell can stand in front of them.
Posted by: DarthVader   2008-02-08 00:05  

00:00