Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
Poll: Obama wipes out Clinton's lead |
2008-02-04 |
Posted by:Fred |
#18 Yu makes me sad Regular J. But i fear your are right. |
Posted by: Thomas Woof 2008-02-04 17:49 |
#17 this is nothing more than Kabuki Theatre Final act: "experienced" Hillary for pres, "young idealist about to receive on the job training for the top slot" Obambi for vp. w/curtain call for McCain (Bob Dole v.08)as the hapless opponent. |
Posted by: regular joe 2008-02-04 15:51 |
#16 It all reminds me of the bad, old days with JFK and LBJ. ABC News even had a piece on it last week...all about the various surviving Kennedys making their endorsements and speculating that Obama and Clinton would end up on the same ticket one way or the other. When they showed an old picture of John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson campaigning together I thought I was gonna throw up. There was the handsome, young, charismatic leader with his treacherous old sidekick and the fate that awaited them. I really don't want to go through all that again but I don't want to vote for McCain either. I'm afraid we're in for some rough sledding. |
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2008-02-04 13:15 |
#15 Still a cheeky move by slim shady. Still in the era of Change and New Politics clintoon did promise not to campaign in Florida and did so anyways. If ya got holes in your pockets change does you no good. |
Posted by: swksvolFF 2008-02-04 12:28 |
#14 It was a regional ad buy in Super-de-Duper Tuesday states, not from Fox but from particular TV stations. People in other states saw something else--in the Cleveland media market, we got ads for the University of Akron, but not Obama. |
Posted by: Mike 2008-02-04 11:37 |
#13 LOTP, I thought the same thing when I saw that commercial run. Everyone looked at me like I was nuts... I'll be curious to see if it becomes and issue and/or what Fox's explanation is. |
Posted by: IG-88 2008-02-04 11:24 |
#12 I thought Fox said there would be no political ads accepted for Super Bowl |
Posted by: lotp 2008-02-04 11:17 |
#11 Article from yesterday cc Comrade Clinton. Obama hows now advertised twice during football games - very low brow and insulting. hilarity's dangerous rhetoric or b.o.'s empty soothsaying. Makes my choice easier minus the senior mcclaim factor. Oh, and then there is Ralphie. |
Posted by: swksvolFF 2008-02-04 11:13 |
#10 I'm coming to the conclusion that this is nothing more than Kabuki Theatre. |
Posted by: Graviling Dark Lord of the Welsh1001 2008-02-04 10:16 |
#9 Up 'til now, my prediction has been that Obama might outperform Hillary in the primaries, but Hilolary would win by dominating among the unelected "superdelegates" (office holders, party hacks, and such who get to go to the convention automatically) because the Clintons play a better game of inside baseball. With the Kennedys going for Obama, I'm not so sure anymore. I don't quite agree with Peggy Noonan (last Friday's column) that Ted is "courageous" or "patriotic" or capable of thinking of anything other than his own narrow self interest. However, unless the party insiders are all going to turn on the Clintons, backing Obama is a risky move--and a little out of character. |
Posted by: Mike 2008-02-04 08:56 |
#8 The Muslim leads the scoundrel. The DNC shows it's true spots. |
Posted by: Icerigger 2008-02-04 08:07 |
#7 Jacqueline, perhaps you are correct, however, Senator McCain could be the worst choice of all, and he is ahead in his party. Apparently, the right person with proven cridentials to be president of the US cannot break through the media's hold on public opinion. Hillary Clinton is a socialist. If that's what you want, Jacqueline, then she's your girl. Go Obama, go Romney. At least the bitter, vindictive people should lose first. |
Posted by: wxjames 2008-02-04 07:41 |
#6 Here's "WTF" Jineng whoever....If Obama gets in the way of these scoundrels, he's likely to meet the fate of dozens of others who have run afoul of them. I wouldn't put anything past the Clintons, nothing at all. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2008-02-04 04:54 |
#5 I really find this hard to believe? Senator Clinton has my vote; and I am a black person. He does not need me since only black people are voting for him. People, Senator Obama is pretending, he is not the uniter that he is trying to portray. |
Posted by: Jacqueline 2008-02-04 04:04 |
#4 I am a black person and find that hard to beleive. I am not voting for Senator Obama. He is not ready to be president. Anyone who votes for him is fooling themselves. I have watch all of the debates and he truly lacks substance. Alson, he is not the uniter that he claims to be and I hope the American people see this for themseleves. |
Posted by: Jacqueline 2008-02-04 03:59 |
#3 WTF?? Get a life Besoeker #2 I certainly hope his Secret Service detail is number one. Posted by: Besoeker 2008-02-04 01:14 |
Posted by: Jineng Untervehr5267 2008-02-04 02:25 |
#2 I certainly hope his Secret Service detail is number one. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2008-02-04 01:14 |
#1 Not to worry. She's got all the vote counters in her corner... |
Posted by: PBMcL 2008-02-04 00:43 |