You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Edwards bid shows poverty not big campaign theme
2008-01-31
The inability of John Edwards to gain traction in his bid for the U.S. Democratic presidential nomination indicates that fighting poverty in America has limited appeal for voters.
Either that, or Edwards has limited appeal, despite the impeccable hair.
Edwards told audiences it was "the issue of my life." But he dropped out of the race on Wednesday because too few responded to his anger at inequality, his heart-rending stories of suffering and his passion about combating corporate greed.
Some of us responded unfavorably to his bitchiness, his overblown rhetoric, and the hypocrisy of a man with a better than half acre house accusing somebody else of "greed." And there's always the fact that some of us prefer to define greed ourselves, rather than having Hair Boy do it for us.
Johnnie thought he could appeal to us the same way he appealed to a jury in a med-mal case: it was just a matter of emoting enough to move us over 'poverty'. The Breck Boy never did figure out that talking to regular people on the campaign trail was a different proposition than talking to twelve people who didn't especially want to be at a trial, which is why he's a one-term ex-senator who'll never get elected to anything ever again.
"These are not issues that generate a lot of votes or poll particularly well," said Mari Culver, wife of Iowa's Democratic Gov. Chet Culver and a tireless campaigner for Edwards in her home state.

Critics called the former senator a hypocrite last summer for getting a $400 haircut and building a large house, but by the end of his campaign many advocates for the poor praised his dedication to the issue.
And lots of the rest of us forgot his existence, only to be reminded of it, albeit briefly, when he dropped out of the race.
Edwards came second in Iowa's caucuses but saw his rivals Senators Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama use some of his best lines, eat into his voting base and weave his issues into larger themes more attractive to Democrats, analysts said.
Thought nobody was responding to his themes? Maybe they only respond if somebody else is pushing them. Maybe the voters don't like him personally.
Nowhere was that clearer than in post-hurricane New Orleans where Edwards launched and ended his campaign, said Louisiana pollster Bernie Pinsonat. The city, devastated by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, was a perfect example of the case that Washington fails to provide economic justice. But even in New Orleans, poverty was not a vote winner because the celebrity of Obama and Clinton made Edwards a third choice even for storm sufferers and voters elsewhere in Louisiana were suspicious of how the city's government used its resources. "His whole campaign was based on a strategy of helping the poor. When Obama got in it was a flawed strategy because in South Carolina and in New Orleans (black) voters were not going to vote for him," said Pinsonat of Southern Media and Opinion.
"His whole campaign was based on a strategy of helping the poor."
So was Mother Theresa's. Guess which one did it better?
Posted by:Fred

#9  LOL Tu!
Posted by: WTF   2008-01-31 22:31  

#8  But, for now, off to Castle Breck to...brood.
Posted by: tu3031   2008-01-31 21:04  

#7  hypocrisy has a smell, and the stank was all over the ambulance-chasing rich boy
Posted by: Frank G   2008-01-31 20:07  

#6  I suggest that Mr Edwards visit Bangalore, India (the "Silicon Valley of India") to see true poverty. Bangalore is not even the poorest area of India or of the rest of the world, but you will see people living in shacks and tents - right next to rich homes. And there, if you are born poor, chances are very, very good that you will die poor, unlike America where it is possible (not easy, but possible) to work your way up through hard work.
By the way, I am not putting down India. The people I worked with there were great. However, the contrast with America was startling.
The poor people in America complain because they only have 100 channels on their cable TVs. Poor people in other countries wonder "what is this TV thing you speak of? We don't even have running water"
Posted by: Rambler   2008-01-31 18:32  

#5  The city, devastated by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, was a perfect example of the case that Washington fails to provide economic justice

Um, no. It just proves that banana-republic practices and a lazy and sympathetic media can buy you a historical fable.
Posted by: Pappy   2008-01-31 12:02  

#4  Â“But he dropped out of the race on Wednesday…”

Ummm…not exactly. Edwards’ hasn’t ended his campaign he has “suspended” his campaign. First, this enables him to retain his whopping 26 delegates. Not really enough to make him a King-maker but chances are he can swap them plus his endorsements for a really cool appointment. Maybe something where he can rub elbows with Bono. More importantly, a suspended campaign allows him to continue to receive federally matching funds. Just so we are clear…that’s taxpayer money. Do you think, after everything is done, he will donate that dough to the poverty stricken underclass minority homeless folks with no healthcare?
Posted by: DepotGuy   2008-01-31 11:35  

#3  Compared to this guy, everybody out here in Second America is poor...
Posted by: tu3031   2008-01-31 09:18  

#2  His whole campaign was based on a strategy of helping the poor.

Poor people don't tend to vote, Breck Boy...
Posted by: Raj   2008-01-31 08:05  

#1  It shows that the 'guilt game' has only so much leg. It is particularly ineffective when the broad expanse of the population sees what constitutes real poverty [not the contrived statistical game] and fundamental casual factors which general go back to human free will. Its why the 'illegal' victimhood game doesn't play well in the general public which sees beyond the poster children and instead spies the daily news of murder, rape, robbery, assaults from the same community that overloads their kids schools and their community health offices.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2008-01-31 07:51  

00:00