You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran Accuses U.S. of Faking Persian Gulf Video
2008-01-10
The Revolutionary Guards in Iran accused the United States on Wednesday of fabricating a video showing Iranian speedboats confronting United States Navy warships in the Persian Gulf over the weekend, according to a report carried by the semi-official Fars news agency and state-run television. “Images released by the U.S. Department of Defense about the Navy vessels are from archive, and sounds on it are fabricated,” an unnamed Revolutionary Guards official said, according to Fars. The news agency has close links to the Revolutionary Guards. The comments were Iran’s first on the video, which the Pentagon released Tuesday.

The Pentagon immediately dismissed the assertion. Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman, told correspondents that Iran’s “allegation is absurd, factually incorrect and reflects the lack of seriousness with which they take this serious incident.”

President Bush chastised Iran on Tuesday for committing a “provocative act.” On Wednesday, at the start of a trip with Mr. Bush to the Middle East, Stephen J. Hadley, his national security adviser, again warned Iran, saying that it had “to be very careful about this, because if it happens again, they are going to bear the consequences of that incident.”

The unnamed Revolutionary Guards official asserted that the video had been released to coincide with Mr. Bush’s trip and “was in line with a project of the Western media to create fear.” The official said the sounds and the images on the video did not go together. “It is very clear that they are fake,” the official said. The video and audio were recorded separately and then matched, Naval and Pentagon officials said Tuesday.

The episode was first described by American officials on Monday, who said it took place the day before in the strategic Strait of Hormuz. They said five armed Iranian speedboats had approached three United States Navy warships in international waters, then maneuvered aggressively as radio threats were issued that the American ships would be blown up. The confrontation ended without shots fired or injuries.

The video runs just over four minutes and, according to Pentagon officials, was shot from the bridge of the guided missile destroyer Hopper. It supported the American version of events, showing speedboats maneuvering around and among the Navy warships. “I am coming to you,” a heavily accented voice says in English. “You will explode after a few minutes.”

Navy officials said the voice was recorded from the internationally recognized bridge-to-bridge radio channel. An American sailor then is heard repeating the threat, stating, “He says, ‘You will explode after a few minutes.’ ” The American is also heard identifying the Navy vessel as a “coalition warship” and announcing: “I am engaged in transit passage in accordance with international law. I intend no harm.”

Bush administration officials say they believe that Iran was trying to provoke the United States on the eve of the president’s visit to the Middle East. “We viewed it as a provocative act,” Mr. Bush told reporters in the Rose Garden on Tuesday, just hours before he left for the weeklong trip in the Middle East. “It is a dangerous situation, and they should not have done it, pure and simple.”
Posted by:Fred

#26  See WND [paraph] > NAVY SAYS VOICE ON RECORDING MAY NOT BE FROM IRANIAN SPEEDBOATS.

ION, also from WND > INVASION USA: MEXICAN SOLDIERS ID'D INVADING THE USA. Dozens of alleged campaigns in Texas and other SW USA.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2008-01-10 19:02  

#25  But . . but . . . unnamed and anonymous are the BEST kind of sources! All the reporters talk to them, too!!


What good is and editor, anyway?
Posted by: Jame Retief   2008-01-10 18:33  

#24  Dear Mr. hass, you gave a link to an unedited blog. Given the problem the New York Times has getting its facts right when the articles are vetted by salaried fact checkers and editors, how are we to treat with confidence a mere NYT blog blurb? Especially when the claim is based on unnamed, anonymous Pentagon staffers?
Posted by: trailing wife   2008-01-10 17:48  

#23  And we all have so much confidence in the New York Times.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2008-01-10 13:25  

#22  OOOPS! looks like there's less to the US version of events than claimed:

"The list of those who are less than fully confident in the PentagonÂ’s video/audio mashup of aggressive maneuvers by Iranian boats near American warships in the Strait of Hormuz now includes the Pentagon itself.

Unnamed Pentagon officials said on Wednesday that the threatening voice heard in the audio clip, which was released on Monday night with a disclaimer that it was recorded separately from the video images and merged with them later, is not directly traceable to the Iranian military..."

New York Times January 10, 2008, 9:40 am

http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/10/degrees-of-confidence-on-us-iran-naval-incident/?hp
Posted by: hass   2008-01-10 12:36  

#21  Glampy posts from the UK. Methinks it confuses 'relaxed' with 'discipline', 'experience', and 'professionalism', something the Brits used to have.
Posted by: Pappy   2008-01-10 12:34  

#20  Nice try, Justice. Your grammar is improving and you made good use of sarcasm which is an element we here at Rantburg appreciate. Most likely there are moon bat elements in this country who would even nod their heads in agreement with you.

But the reality is that a swarm of speed boats packed with high explosives and piloted by crazy, frickin' suicidal Iranians does indeed pose a threat to our ships and should be blown out of the water if they get too close. Shortly after that we should bomb the hell out of your pathetic little country just to make sure it never happens again.

Your boys the other day were lucky. They ran it right up to the limit and got away with it. Next time they might not. The only way you'll know for sure is to keep trying.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2008-01-10 12:14  

#19  If justlice is sounding like the koolaid man to anyone else, gigli9409 is the pitcher crashing through the wall.
Unless irun made a fake to rebute a US fake - or the US made a fake irun tape to substantiate the original US fake - or gigli9409 is a fake justlice who faked a comment about an irun fake tape refuting the fake US tape.

All this talk about dingies with lifevests makes me wonder how that whole malaysia health minister deal is cooking. More coffee over here please!
Posted by: swksvolFF   2008-01-10 11:46  

#18  sinse: I remember, but I still don't think so. AFAIK the hull on the USS Cole is only half an inch thick, so I figure these ships are built similarly. Any RPG worth its salt can punch right through that like so much tissue paper. Don't even the folks in the Strykers and Bradleys worry about RPGs? Those have way more armor than a warship.

And it turns out the number on the USS Hopper is 70, so I got that wrong for sure!
Posted by: gorb   2008-01-10 11:19  

#17  gorb i stated this yesterday, i doubt a n RPG would puncture a heavily armored warship. A couple of weeks ago on the history channel they had a show on about pirates off the coast of africa striking a cruise ship with RPG rounds and there wasn't that much damage besides nerves
Posted by: sinse   2008-01-10 10:54  

#16  I wondered how many retard traitors there could be who would even pretend to believe this ludicrous Persian lie. Looks like Justice is at the front of the line for the short bus.
Posted by: Excalibur   2008-01-10 09:55  

#15  I heard on Fox last night, that the Pentagon was looking into the explode part of the tape, that it may have come from land and not the boats!
Posted by: Sherry   2008-01-10 09:54  

#14  And one more thing, Justice: The video that the Iranians released was fabricated. I'll bet everything you own that it was. I posted a story about this that hopefully will show up later, including details as to why I think it was fabricated.

Any idea as to why the Iranians would fabricate this? Suppose they've got something to hide? Hey, dinghies are just, well, dinghies. According to your well-informed judgment. Nothing to hide, right? Can't be! You've been whitewater rafting before!
Posted by: gorb   2008-01-10 09:12  

#13  Justice: The first, most basic thought that comes to me is that an RPG will punch right through the hull of one of those ships? Supposing you were the captain of that ship, what would you do with a dead crewman or two or three? Are they expendable? What if one of them were your brother? Would you like anyone talking trash about a decision to take action at a distance which is within the lethal range of a semi-lucky RPG shot? Yes, those things reach out hundreds of yards farther than the distance those dinghies were from the warships. The only thing the captain had going for him was that the dinghies are an unstable platform to shoot from.

And those IRG guys don't think like you or me. Don't dismiss this little fact.

How about you rethink things in those terms and let us know what you really think.
Posted by: gorb   2008-01-10 09:07  

#12  Real easy solution. Next time, blow them out of the water...
Posted by: tu3031   2008-01-10 08:33  

#11  Bush Derangement Syndrome is officially a pandemic.
Posted by: doc   2008-01-10 08:16  

#10  troll fever..catch it!
Posted by: Frank G   2008-01-10 08:00  

#9  A rubber Dingy blew a hole in the USS Cole.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2008-01-10 06:47  

#8  Poor Justice.
Posted by: trailing wife   2008-01-10 06:31  

#7  ah Rosie, too much time on your hands now that you were fired from the View?
Posted by: Whomong Guelph4611   2008-01-10 06:02  

#6  There is nothing dramatic about the footage; it is a badly made fake. First it shows speed boats patrolling, nothing dramatic about that, it happens daily over there. The conversation from the warship to the boats again normal. Conversation from the speed boat to the ship....FAKE, The voice is robotic and not at all what one would expect considering the noise and vibration that riding in those craft at that speed would provoke when all ' this so called action ' was happening it seems as if one of the crew just ' happened to have a ' video camera, and for such a stressing period,,,,,, well they seem very relaxed. Notice the 'threat' is an audio file and is tagged on the end with several videos tagged together and taken by different cams.
With all that technology and this is the only thing they can come up with - a handheld video cam on deck?...Is this yet again another stunt by the American Government to show the people that they are under threat????........Answer should be only from G.BUSH & Co ........thatÂ’s the people they should be scared of. The reporters present should have questioned this simple fact before they report this bit of rubbish as fact.
Posted by: Glamp Grundy9409   2008-01-10 05:55  

#5  A crazy statement, but it'll hold up. The anti-US forces have never had truthiness as their strong point, and a denial is all they need to start frothing at the mouth as usual.
Posted by: gromky   2008-01-10 05:42  

#4  Huffington Post must have a direct line to the Propaganda mill in Tehran:

A New Disgrace at HuffPo

"They come so frequently, it's hard to get worked up, but there's a dead giveaway this time. The teaser for the piece reads, "At the risk of sounding like an apologist for the Islamic Republic..." The author is Hooman Majd, who accuses the Pentagon of manufacturing the incident with Iran in the Gulf this week."

Majd's column was posted at 11:41AM Wednesday, no more than a few hours after the release of the RG statement, and does not reference any Iranian claims.
Posted by: Gromomble Oppressor of the Iowans8916   2008-01-10 03:33  

#3  Jan, very very good point.
Posted by: twobyfour   2008-01-10 01:36  

#2  The video was not faked, our video fabricators won't cross the picket lines.
Posted by: Super Hose   2008-01-10 00:38  

#1  hmmm, if they are fabricated boats, then they won't mind the fabricated explosions
Posted by: Jan at work   2008-01-10 00:20  

00:00