You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Iraq Violence at Lowest Levels Since 2004
2007-12-17
Violence in Iraq is at its lowest levels since the first year of the American invasion, finally opening a window for reconciliation among rival sects, the second-ranking U.S. general said Sunday as Iraqi forces formally took control of security across half the country. Lt. Gen. Ray Odierno, the man responsible for the ground campaign in Iraq, said that the first six months of 2007 were probably the most violent period since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003. The past six months, however, had seen some of the lowest levels of violence since the conflict began, Odierno said, attributing the change to an increase in both American troops and better-trained Iraqi forces.

"I feel we are back in '03 and early '04. Frankly I was here then, and the environment is about the same in terms of security in my opinion," he said. "What is different from then is that the Iraqi security forces are significantly more mature."

Odierno said Anbar province, once plagued by violence, only recorded 12 attacks in the past week, down from an average of 26 per week over the past three months. "The violence last week was the lowest ever," he said of Anbar. "So that kind of defines 2007 very simply. A long hard fight and a lot of sacrifice by a lot of soldiers, Marines and airmen to get there," Odierno said.

A planned reduction of troops to about 130,000 at the end of next year from a high of around 165,000 at the height of the "surge" should not derail that effort, but Iraq's government must take advantage of the improved security, Odierno said. There are 154,000 U.S. troops in Iraq now. "We have a window, I don't know how long that window is, but there is a window because of the security to move forward," Odierno told a small group of journalists at his headquarters in Baghdad. "We need to get policies in place by the central government to do this."

One of the most important, he said, was a draft bill to ease curbs implemented against former supporters of Saddam Hussein's Baath Party in the aftermath of the 2003 invasion. "Reconciliation must continue," Odierno said.

The U.S.-led coalition has been gradually transferring control of security to the Iraqi government and Britain's handover of southern Basra was the latest in a series that began in July 2006. The coalition retains control over half of Iraq's 18 provinces, including Anbar and central areas where violence has flagged but not stopped.
No, the Iraqis control exactly half: 9 of 18 with Basra handed over.
"This is a step toward resuming security responsibilities in all of Iraq's provinces that is due in the middle of next year," Iraqi National Security adviser Mouwaffak al-Rubaie said in Basra. He represented Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki at the handover ceremony in the capital of the oil-rich region.

In Diyala, one of Iraq's most dangerous regions, al-Qaida militants tried to regain control of several villages around Khalis, 50 miles north of Baghdad, but the U.S. backed volunteers drove them away, said Abdul Karim al-Rubaie of the provincial command center. "It is a battle of life and death, it is a continuous fight until we cleanse all the villages on the outskirts of Khalis," said Sheik Zuhair al-Obeidi, who was involved in Sunday's fighting.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  A good view of how the IA and the militias view the US army is that they all want M-16s or M-4s instead of AK-47s. Even though the M series need more tender loving care in the desert. The AK-47 is seen as a "loser's" weapon. Ha-ha!
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-12-17 09:12  

#2  Maliki hasn't done anything that I'm aware of that pi$$es me off for several months now. Does he feel more secure and has been making decisions that involve less hedging as a result of it? Did he have a little "Come to Jesus" session with someone? Is this a hopeful sign?

I've seen pics of the IA walking around with a very professional demeanor. I'm proud the coalition has been able to train them that well despite a lifetime of bad examples and training. I hope it sticks. I'll bet that behavior is going to snowball when they realize what kind of respect it commands and how much it will demoralize the bad guys. It must have been a problem because the bad guys are going back to their bases in Pakistan or wherever and getting similar training now. Probably had plenty of moles in the IA to take their learnings back to the bad guys, and now we (or more likely the IA) are going to have to face more advanced fighting techniques soon. But imitation is the most sincere form of flattery, and given their machismo, it was probably a necessity or they wouldn't be doing it.

Oh, BTW:
Posted by: gorb   2007-12-17 02:44  

#1  This is further proof of this administrations failure to protect America. By allowing the enemy to redeploy from Anbar before Iraqi reconcilliation, President Bush and the Republicans who like this war have put all Americans, and especially our soldiers on the front lines, in grave danger.
Posted by: Nancy Pelosi   2007-12-17 00:55  

00:00