You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Ahmadinejobless
2007-12-12
By Monica Maggioni

IranÂ’s radical president is sinking fast, and he knows it. Now, thereÂ’s only one man who can keep Mahmoud Ahmadinejad out of the unemployment line: George W. Bush.

In Tehran, the mood is quickly shifting. And itÂ’s easy to feel it every time you stop to buy a newspaper, have a coffee, or wait in line at the grocery store. Mahmoud AhmadinejadÂ’s star is fading fast.

Since his election in June 2005, Iranians have had conflicted feelings about their president. At first, he evoked interest and curiosity. And there were great expectations from this humble man who was promising economic reform, an anticorruption campaign, and a rigid moral scheme for daily life. Then came fear—when Ahmadinejad began to destroy any chance of good relations with the outside world.

But today in Iran, laughter is supplanting fear. Mocking the president has become a pastime not only for rebellious university students, but also members of the establishment and the government itself.

Behind the high walls of Iranian palaces or in the quiet of Tehran’s parks, Iranian elites will indulge in a quick laugh about the president’s intelligence or his populist bombast. Jokes about his résumé are especially popular. Many refer to his “Ph.D. in traffic” or his letter last May to U.S. President George W. Bush, in which he proclaimed, “I am a teacher.”

The jokes—and who is delivering them—tell the story of a man whose power is on the decline as Iran’s economy collapses around him. Prices for basic goods are skyrocketing, and the government is unable to cope with increasing poverty. Just last month, over 50 Iranian economists sent an open letter excoriating the president’s mismanagement of the economy.

For each public gathering, his loyalists must now arrange hundreds of buses from the remotest and poorest regions of the country. The presidentÂ’s rented crowds shuffle off the buses for an hour or two and then enjoy Tehran sightseeing, lunch, and dinner paid for by AhmadinejadÂ’s inner circle in the administration.

Perhaps the best evidence of the presidentÂ’s decline, though, is the single-digit support obtained by his party in last DecemberÂ’s administrative elections. A personal defeat for Ahmadinejad, the loss reduced his base of support to an elite minority inside the powerful, hard-line Revolutionary Guards, also known as the Pasdaran. ItÂ’s this same minority that struggles against any attempt to open IranÂ’s economy and political system; with their extensive oil holdings, they are unperturbed by the countryÂ’s isolation or its economic woes. But even inside the Pasdaran, one can find distinct viewpoints and conflicting interests, which is why AhmadinejadÂ’s political stronghold is far from secure.

In fact, there are already signs that his job is in jeopardy. Tehran is rife with speculation that Ali Larijani, who is now widely seen as positioning himself for the post-Ahmadinejad era, and Mohammed Baqer Qalibaf, who competed against Ahmadinejad in 2005 and is still popular with members of both conservative and reformist camps, are already working to undermine the president. The next presidential elections are scheduled for June 2009. As a pragmatic conservative and one of IranÂ’s most prominent politicians, Larijani in particular is likely to do well. To be sure, he is no reformist along the lines of AhmadinejadÂ’s charismatic predecessor, Mohammed Khatami; in fact, Larijani was happy to see the reformists swept from the political scene following AhmadinejadÂ’s election. And as his tenacity as IranÂ’s top nuclear negotiator shows, he would be no shrinking violet on the international stage. At the same time, however, Larijani fairly drips with disdain for his boss, a president he sees as devoid of skill or rational stratagem in dealing with the rest of the world.

But itÂ’s likely that AhmadinejadÂ’s power will decrease dramatically even before 2009. The elections for IranÂ’s parliament in March 2008 could represent a turning point if the majority inside the parliament shifts against him. Ahmadinejad still has a strong supporter in Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, who heads the 12-member Guardian Council that holds the political reins in Iran. The Council must clear all candidates for the presidency and parliament. But the Council itself is not monolithic, and it will be impossible to keep all the reformists and pragmatist conservatives out of the electoral race. But even if Ahmadinejad makes it through next spring, many analysts in the country are ready to bet that he wonÂ’t be reelected in 2009; the opposition is just too strong, and the economy will likely be in worse straits by that time.

In fact, the only thing that could save him now is the United States. Nobody knows this better than Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
And George Bush. While Monica doesn't realize it, GWB has done a pretty good job isolating Iran without giving Short Round any pretext to declear martial law (for example) or round up his opponents.
As his support within Iran has evaporated, he has cranked up the anti-American rhetoric, and the U.S. military has publicly accused the Pasdaran of arming insurgents in Iraq and even Afghanistan. At this point, the only way Ahmadinejad can revive his flagging fortunes is by uniting his country against an external threat. U.S. officials adamantly maintain that Washington is committed to using diplomacy to resolve the conflict over IranÂ’s nuclear program and its aggressive role in the region. Yet pressure is mounting in some branches of the Bush administration to take military action against Iran. That pressure should be resisted. For military action would give Mahmoud Ahmadinejad exactly what he wants most: job security.
Again, Bush knows this: we're waving the big stick with one hand and using the other to subvert Short Round quietly.

Monica Maggioni is a Middle East special correspondent for ItalyÂ’s RAI TV.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  The Iranian people laugh at nut-job because he is isolating them from the free world. They don't want him in power so they hate GW because... Bush is on their side. Yeah ok. Makes sense if you have a rabid, drooling case of BDS.

I guess those students rounded up and arrested yesterday are having a good chuckle about Ahmadinejad right now.

It is like 7 steps to Kevin Bacon. For these loon-bats, everything bad in the world is one step to GWB. He's the boogey man under their bed.

Hey Maggie - go take some meds - you are babbling nonsense
Posted by: Whomong Guelph4611   2007-12-12 21:43  

#2  Which may help explain the NIE, but probably not.

Suppose Nutjob goes away. What then? I suspect the Iranians would continue their nuke program since they started it before he was a player, what does Nutjob's leaving change? He'd just be made a scapegoat and nothing would change.
Posted by: gorb   2007-12-12 07:26  

#1  For military action would give Mahmoud Ahmadinejad exactly what he wants most: job security.

Albeit rather brief. As well as the term of his lifespan may be reduced substantially. And that would apply to many a moolah around him.

I dunno, I am torn.
Posted by: twobyfour   2007-12-12 00:51  

00:00