You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Iraq rejects permanent U.S. bases:
2007-12-11
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Iraq will never allow the United States to have permanent military bases on its soil, the government's national security adviser said.

"We need the United States in our war against terrorism, we need them to guard our border sometimes, we need them for economic support and we need them for diplomatic and political support," Mowaffaq al-Rubaie said.

"But I say one thing, permanent forces or bases in Iraq for any foreign forces is a red line that cannot be accepted by any nationalist Iraqi," he told Dubai-based al Arabiya television in an interview broadcast late on Monday.

His comments were the clearest sign yet that Iraq's leaders are looking ahead to the days when they have full responsibility for its defense.

The United States has around 160,000 troops in Iraq, officially under a United Nations mandate enacted after the U.S.-led invasion in 2003.

Iraq formally asked the United Nations on Monday to renew that mandate for a year until the end of 2008. It made clear it would not extend the mandate beyond next year and the mandate could be revoked sooner at Iraq's request.

President George W. Bush and Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki signed a declaration of principles last month agreeing to friendly long-term ties. Arrangements for U.S. troops to stay beyond next year will be negotiated in early 2008.

Iraq has become less violent in recent months after Bush sent an extra 30,000 troops. Washington intends to reduce its force by more than 20,000 by June 2008 and is expected to decide in March on force levels beyond that date.

FULLY DEPLOYED

The total number of attacks has fallen 60 percent since June when the additional U.S. troops became fully deployed.

In a statement, the U.S. military said the number of mortar and rocket attacks in Baghdad fell by nearly half last month, to 25 in November from 49 in October. Continued ...

Posted by:Phusing Hupaling8551

#4  It's a perpetual lease; both Cuba and the US have to agree to end it, or the US abandons the base.
Posted by: Pappy   2007-12-11 16:03  

#3  Even the base in Guantanimo wouldn't be considered permanent? I think we have a lease but I'm not sure when it runs up.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-12-11 15:10  

#2  That's the point, it doesn't. The US never had any permanent bases in Germany, either. Permanent bases are used by occupation or conquering forces, not friends.

The US, however, as Germany also learned, is a very, very generous friend.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-12-11 14:39  

#1  How does a permanent base look different than a long term base... like 50 years?
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-12-11 13:32  

00:00