| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Richard C. Clark warns not to bomb Iran |
| 2007-11-29 |
| Oh, well, that settles it, then. |
| Posted by:anonymous5089 |
| #5 Not bombing Iran might be a strategic blunder because it might cause nearly 4 decades of terrorist attacks (1979-07) that could culminate in a nuclear attack. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2007-11-29 19:14 |
| #4 bombing Iran would be a 'strategic blunder' because it would prompt a violent response Only if you don't do it right. |
| Posted by: DMFD 2007-11-29 18:34 |
| #3 Lots of talk about the mysteries of what might happen if we bomb Iran. Not a lot of talk about the less-mysterious what might happen if we don't. After all Saddam was 5 years from developing nukes 5 years ago. Or so EVERYONE said prior to the invasion. Would the world have been a better place with a nuclear armed Iran and Iraq and Isreal? |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2007-11-29 17:43 |
| #2 Not having cabinet level access must have really been a bitch! Somebody needs to give him his milk money! |
| Posted by: smn 2007-11-29 10:20 |
| #1 Damn, forgot my Dude pic! |
| Posted by: anonymous5089 2007-11-29 09:14 |