You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
Syria wants Golan Heights on table at talks with Israel
2007-11-26
JERUSALEM: The US has given tacit approval to separate peace talks between Israel and Syria immediately after tomorrow's Middle East summit in Annapolis, Maryland.

Diplomats believe that Syria's expected participation in the meeting to be chaired by the US Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, signals a likely resumption of direct talks between the country's Baathist regime and the Israeli Government, for the first time in more than a decade.

Syria had insisted that the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, seized from its control in the 1967 war, be on the table for discussion as a precondition for taking part in the summit.
Cf G(r)omgoru's Arab Way of war : start a war, lose a war, apply conditions to the victor.
On Friday it was among Arab countries that agreed to send ministers to the US for this week's meeting - itself the first US-hosted talks on the Middle East since president Bill Clinton's ill-fated final effort eight years ago. The Arab League's unanimous decision to take part in the summit was criticised by the Hamas movement on Saturday.

A spokesman said there could be no justification for taking part as long as Israel retained its hold on Palestinian territory and described the decision to do so as "a great shock".

But others were pleased. "At some point we need to have a renewed Israel-Syrian peace track. We need this," said the Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat in Morocco.
Posted by:anonymous5089

#9  Syria wants Golan Heights on table

Any hope of real progress should involve Assad being bent over a table.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-11-26 23:53  

#8  That might work -- if the ROE the US forces work under allow them to shoot back and actually do their job.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2007-11-26 17:25  

#7  If Israel gets US troops guarding a demilitarized no-troop land under Syrian administrative authority in exchange for Syrian recognition and Syria breaking from Iran, it might not be the worst deal Israel could make. Note the Saudis are expanding oil production.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2007-11-26 13:23  

#6  Does the Knesset get to vote on ratifying (or not) whatever agreement the negotiators make?
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-11-26 12:57  

#5  If Israel is stupid enough to agree to any demands, it will be the camp David accords all over again. Israel gives up a lot and gets a lot of terror and death in return. If I was Israel, I would tell Syria to go fuck themselves and if they had a problem with it we would blow them to fucking Narnia.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-11-26 11:13  

#4  Why the hell not - Olmert has already given in a lot and they smell blood.

I have a very bad feeling about this Annapolis 'meeting'. I think its simply going to be a opportunity for the Islamists to demand the destruction of Israel and Israel will be condemned when it doesn't give in to all the demands immediately.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2007-11-26 11:06  

#3  A nice, fluffy pony.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2007-11-26 10:16  

#2  And a ponny.
Posted by: twobyfour   2007-11-26 09:14  

#1  The New Western Way of war : get dragged into a war, win a war, pay tribute to the loser for decades.
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-11-26 08:59  

00:00