You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
US defends AP photographerÂ’s detention in Iraq
2007-11-22
BAGHDAD - The US military on Wednesday defended its 19-month detention of an award-winning Associated Press photographer it has accused of working with insurgents in Iraq, saying he remained a “security threat”.

Bilal Hussein, who began working with the news agency in 2004, has been in US military custody in Iraq since he was detained in April 2006 in the city of Ramadi, 110 km (68 miles) west of Baghdad, according to the AP website. Since Hussein’s arrest, “this case has been reviewed a number of times by the standing board that does periodic reviews of individuals in detention,” US military spokesman Major- General Kevin Bergner told a news conference. “In each instance the recommendation was to continue detention because of the continued security threat that he represented.”

Bergner declined to discuss the evidence against Hussein, who took pictures for the AP in western Anbar province, which until a tribal security push began last year was the heartland of IraqÂ’s Sunni Arab insurgency.

Earlier this week, the Pentagon called Hussein a “terrorist media operative who infiltrated the AP”. Berger said only that Hussein had been detained “as a result of his interactions with insurgent activities”.
Which is how he got all the great photos.
The military has said in the past that Hussein was detained for possessing materials used to make roadside bombs, insurgent propaganda, and a surveillance photo of a coalition installation.

AP president and chief executive officer Tom Curley said this week in a statement: “While we are hopeful that there could be some resolution to Bilal Hussein’s long detention, we have grave concerns that his rights under the law continue to be ignored and even abused.”

Military officials are expected to file a formal complaint against Hussein in Iraq’s Central Criminal Court. “We are now at a point where that case is to be conveyed ... for judicial consideration,” Bergner said.

Hussein, 36, is just one of a number of Iraqi journalists who have been held by the US military without being charged. Reuters journalists have also been detained by the US military for months and later released without charges.
Posted by:Steve White

#5  If we considered the photogs mucking about with terrorists the enemy and popped them on sight, this nonsense would have ended long ago. Our blind allegiance to peacetime rules in war is viewed as a weakness to be exploited by our enemies, who have more common sense that many in our govt, at least w/r/t fighting a war with no holds barred.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2007-11-22 13:01  

#4  I hounded the military side public affairs people to talk smack and clarify the issues in an aggressive manner so that the press would have to report it, to almost no avail.

Yet another indicator that our propaganda experts are all brain dead.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-11-22 12:35  

#3  Maybe the Italians want a crack at Bilal for the propaganda show and snapping away while an Italian was murdered.
Posted by: ed   2007-11-22 10:57  

#2  Earlier this week, the Pentagon called Hussein a “terrorist media operative who infiltrated was recruited by the AP”.

Fixed it.
Posted by: Abu Uluque6305    2007-11-22 10:30  

#1  In other news, the Coalition has killed thousands in Iraq without having charged them. In Afghanistan, the same. Rumor has it that the US killed hundreds of thousands in Korea, Vietnam, and WWII without charging them.

Uh, yeah, idiots, because IT'S A FRIGGIN' WAR, not a handsome peace-time court in the US.

The wires have always used this little snarky distortion when discussing the various times their employees have run afoul of the forces of good. I actually confronted some on it once, receiving mostly blank stares (they literally didn't even understand my point - this is sometimes the intellectual level we're up against). I hounded the military side public affairs people to talk smack and clarify the issues in an aggressive manner so that the press would have to report it, to almost no avail. There was, for a time, one wee little tidbit in press releases on related matters that pointed out the enemy's policy of war crimes (endangering non-combatants deliberately to gain military advantage) was entirely responsible for the unfortunate deaths and injuries to (uh, stupid) reporters who got caught up in cross-fires.

I hope the team in charge of Bilal's case is a little sharper than the group that looks like they will put on military commissions in Gitmo no sooner than the second Giuliani Administration ....
Posted by: Verlaine   2007-11-22 03:46  

00:00