You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
US media getting it “all wrong” on Pakistan: Durrani
2007-11-03
WASHINGTON: Pakistan’s ambassador in US Mahmud Ali Durrani has accused the mainstream US media of “getting the story all wrong” when it comes to Pakistan’s efforts to root out terrorism and Islamic extremism.
"Honest. It's nothing like the facts suggest."
“None of their information is correct,” he told The Washington Diplomat, a publication focused on the diplomatic corps based in Washington.
"None of it. Zippo. Zilch. Those guys at Rantburg have it all wrong."
“We are more than victims of terrorism, but there are people who don’t believe us. Pakistan has become a fall guy for all the bad things happening in the neighbourhood,” he added.
"Just because our efforts to use the extremists as tools have turned around and seriously chewed us, is that our fault? I ask you!"
He said the attack on former premier Benazir BhuttoÂ’s homecoming procession was carried out either by Al Qaeda or the Taliban, or a combination of the two.
I agree with that assessment.
Neither the governments of Pakistan or India were involved.
No one, with the exception of the Paks, of course, has suggested Indian involvement. The Pak government was probably not officially involved, but it's my educated guess that elements of the ISI were, as well as nasties associated with Hamid Gul and/or Aslam Beg. Benazir herself pointed out five prime suspects, one of whom was a close personal friend of Perv.
“Benazir Bhutto and Musharraf had the same agenda. They were two allies.
... as we've seen, lo, these past six years or so.
These people who did this have a very narrow vision of Islam. They probably think she’s not a real Muslim.”
They don't even consider her a human being.
In the long term, he was hopeful, liberal forces would galvanise and get together, leaving their differences behind to fight the common enemy.
That'd be pretty much a first, as we're seeing all over the world. The bad guys get to prance around making faces and rolling their eyes and waving guns. The liberal forces try to avoid confrontation and mostly squat to pee.
Durrani said the possibility of President Musharraf forming a coalition with Benazir Bhutto was “high” because the government had exonerated her of any possible crimes.

“By law, anybody who’s convicted of corruption cannot run. But in those cases, which were under investigation for 10 years and never proven, we give amnesty. The allegations of corruption against Benazir were not proven. The government wants a consensus so that we move ahead without any acrimony or mistrust.”

He conceded that “Pakistan was in bed with the Taliban when they were governing Afghanistan, for an excellent reason. We always supported the government in Kabul, irrespective of who it was. But that’s history now. We gave that up after 9/11, when we made a 180-degree switch because we found that was in our interest.”

The interview took place at what the journal calls “Pakistan’s $17 million embassy on International Drive.” Durrani said Pakistan has “almost licked” Al Qaeda after the 9/11 attacks but everything changed after the US invaded Iraq, reviving Al Qaeda.

He said global pledges made to Afghanistan had not been honoured, warning, “If you don’t give them an alternative way of life, they will kill. This is the only thing they know.” There was also a growing nexus between Al Qaeda and international drug barons. He said criticism of Pakistan’s peace agreement in the tribal areas was “totally misconstrued” and a “lot of BS (bullshit)”.
And then his lips fell off.
He said as ambassador he had no problems with the administration or the public but he had one with the media, which is getting the Pakistan story wrong. He defended his country on the Daniel Pearl and Mukhtar Mai cases. He explained, “Danny Pearl goes to meet the bad guys and gets in trouble. Tomorrow night, walk into some bad neighborhood of DC, and you’re also likely to get in trouble … One rape in Pakistan? There are more unreported rapes in the United States than the total number of rapes in Pakistan. If it happens in a village following some stupid custom, then people perceive that it’s happening all over the country.”

About US unpopularity in Pakistan, the ambassador said, “If today, you have a crowd of 1,000 people chanting anti-American slogans and somebody offers to give out US visas, 900 would definitely accept, if not all of them. Pakistani people like American values and the American system.”
Yeah, and if you were to hand out free explosives, 800 at least would take them, if only for use on a rainy day.
Posted by:john frum

#5  MSM has it all wrong. Does this mean they (MSM) are ignorant, lazy, traitorous, or have an agenda or all of the above?
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-11-03 09:53  

#4  You have to admit that claiming that the MSM has been "getting the story all wrong" is a strong opener. Start with something incontrovertible
Posted by: James   2007-11-03 09:24  

#3  Â“If you donÂ’t give them an alternative way of life, they will kill. This is the only thing they know.”

Hokay, how about an alternative way of death?

Isn't using extremists as tools a lot like working with room temperature nitroglycerine on a hot summer day in earthquake country?
Posted by: Zenster   2007-11-03 06:34  

#2  "Honest. It's nothing like the facts suggest."

I read, I lol'd.

Posted by: Thomas Woof   2007-11-03 02:40  

#1  "Pakistani people like American values and the American system"

btw, Pakis should ask themselves whether they really have such high esteem from the rest of the non mossie world...considering the amount of hype and noise they make.
Posted by: Duh!   2007-11-03 01:23  

00:00