Submit your comments on this article | |
Syria-Lebanon-Iran | |
Obama says he would talk to Iran | |
2007-11-03 | |
![]()
| |
Posted by:Fred |
#7 Indeed. Negotiations mean giving something of yours up. What would Obama like to give up in the name of Peace In Our Time? |
Posted by: eLarson 2007-11-03 16:51 |
#6 Obama Says He Would For example, "Yep, you can have Iraq..." |
Posted by: Crereper Bucket4485 2007-11-03 13:03 |
#5 Iran can certainly use a good talking to. I just don't think Obama is the guy to do it. Maybe John Bolton. Or a thick-necked guy named Guido. Nice country ya got here, A-jad. Be a shame if something happened to it. |
Posted by: SteveS 2007-11-03 11:01 |
#4 .....if elected he would “engage in aggressive personal diplomacy” with Iran, part of a broader policy aimed at stabilizing neighbouring Iraq in order to withdraw US troops. Appears he's at least idenfied Iran as a de-stabiling factor in the war. I sincerely hope others on the Hill |
Posted by: Besoeker 2007-11-03 09:58 |
#3 I love how these flippin' idiots shriek that we have to have multi-lateral negotiations.....until the Euroweenies spend 4 YEARS "negotiating" to absolutely no avail. So now, we should unilaterally talk to them because, you know, Americans talk so much better than Euros. Where's TR when you need him? |
Posted by: AlanC 2007-11-03 09:53 |
#2 Well, after talking about the weather, the family, the menu, etc. what do you talk about? |
Posted by: JohnQC 2007-11-03 09:41 |
#1 “We are willing to talk about certain assurances in the context of them showing some good faith,” Obama told the Times. Obama is Neville Chamberlain reincarnated. |
Posted by: WTF 2007-11-03 08:24 |