| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| Fukayama's latest brain fart |
| 2007-10-27 |
| When I wrote about the End of History almost 20 years ago, one thing that I did not anticipate was the degree to which American behaviour and misjudgments would make anti-Americanism one of the chief fault lines of global politics. And yet, particularly since the terrorist attacks of September 11 2001, that is precisely what has happened, owing to four key mistakes made by the Bush administration. First, the doctrine of "preemption", which was devised in response to the 2001 attacks, was inappropriately broadened to include Iraq and other so-called "rogue states" that threatened to develop weapons of mass destruction. To be sure, preemption is fully justified vis-a-vis stateless terrorists wielding such weapons. But it cannot be the core of a general non-proliferation policy, whereby the United States intervenes militarily everywhere to prevent the development of nuclear weapons. The second important miscalculation concerned the likely global reaction to America's exercise of its hegemonic power. Many people within the Bush administration believed that even without approval by the UN security council or Nato, American power would be legitimised by its successful use. This had been the pattern for many US initiatives during the cold war, and in the Balkans during the 1990s; back then, it was known as "leadership" rather than "unilateralism". America's third mistake was to overestimate how effective conventional military power would be in dealing with the weak states and networked transnational organisations that characterise international politics, at least in the broader Middle East. Finally, the Bush administration's use of power has lacked not only a compelling strategy or doctrine, but also simple competence. In Iraq alone, the administration misestimated the threat of WMD, failed to plan adequately for the occupation, and then proved unable to adjust quickly when things went wrong. To this day, it has dropped the ball on very straightforward operational issues in Iraq, such as funding democracy promotion efforts. Incompetence in implementation has strategic consequences. Many of the voices that called for, and then bungled, military intervention in Iraq are now calling for war with Iran. Why should the rest of the world think that conflict with a larger and more resolute enemy would be handled any more capably? But the fundamental problem remains the lopsided distribution of power in the international system. Any country in the same position as the US, even a democracy, would be tempted to exercise its hegemonic power with less and less restraint. America's founding fathers were motivated by a similar belief that unchecked power, even when democratically legitimated, could be dangerous, which is why they created a constitutional system of internally separated powers to limit the executive. Such a system does not exist on a global scale today, which may explain how America got into such trouble. A smoother international distribution of power, even in a global system that is less than fully democratic, would pose fewer temptations to abandon the prudent exercise of power. I can't wait to hear what our betters have to say when before Bush leaves office it's clear even to them that he defeated al-Qaeda in Iraq. But, I'm convinced. Let's give Iran the bomb. And Zimbobway too. |
| Posted by:Nimble Spemble |
| #6 Fuki made a fortune selling his book in the 90s and now finds he made himself irrelevant. Life is tough taht way. I remember at the time some folks were saying Islam was the next big bad guys and others (like Fuki) were saying that the right just needed an enemy and they were making one up. He missed the boat totally. I can't imaging taking anything he says seriously anymore. |
| Posted by: rjschwarz 2007-10-27 23:36 |
| #5 Reality says: Sorry to screw up all your beautiful theories, big boy. But you seem to have completely overlooked the rise of the primal force of religion-based global conquest. We might not be at the end of history after all. Better luck next time. |
| Posted by: Grumenk Philalzabod0723 2007-10-27 19:13 |
| #4 No, really, I have credibility. I'm not a failure. I'm not a luser. Everything would have been just like I said it was going to be except they were so incompetnet. I mean, incompetant. Imcopetant. You Earthmen are stupid, stupid, stupid! |
| Posted by: Anonymoose 2007-10-27 17:25 |
| #3 Yah, the UN did a great job in Rwanda. They really went to bat for disempowered people in that and other incidents. (sarcasm alert) |
| Posted by: McZoid 2007-10-27 14:54 |
| #2 F**k-mypajama is still trying to find some relevancy after all these years. He ought to hook up with him for substance. |
| Posted by: Sigmund Freud 2007-10-27 14:23 |
| #1 The eternal cry of the academic. "No! No! No! My theory can't be wrong! It's __________ fault." |
| Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2007-10-27 11:57 |
