You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Iran closer to nuclear bomb: emigres
2007-10-27
BRUSSELS - Iran may be closer to developing nuclear weapons than three to eight years believed by the UN nuclear watchdog, the countryÂ’s emigre opposition said on Friday. And changing IranÂ’s chief nuclear negotiator, Ali Larijani, showed the country no longer needed to play for time in negotiations to push ahead with its nuclear programme, the National Council of Resistance of Iran said.

The group was the first to report in 2002 the existence in Iran of uranium enrichment facility at Natanz and heavy water plant at Arak, facilities the West suspects could be used for the production of the atomic bomb. “According to our intelligence, the Iranian regime is closer to having a bomb than what Mr ElBaradei says,” the Council’s expert, Alireza Jafarzadeh, told a news conference, referring to Mohamed ElBaradei, the chief of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

“We are talking about last minutes to prevent the Iran regime from having a bomb,” Jafarzadeh said. “By replacing Larijani with another revolutionary guard commander, the Iranian regime has sent a very clear message that it is closer to a bomb, as there is no need for negotiations as was the case in previous years,” he added.

IranÂ’s new chief negotiator, Saeed Jalili, is a close ally of hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The Council also welcomed new sanctions against Teheran imposed by the United States on Thursday, saying they would hit the operations of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. “The designation of the Revolutionary Guard and other related entities ... is important. It harms the Revolutionary Guards’ significant financial resources, puts a squeeze on them, makes their operations very difficult,” said Jafarzadeh.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  Does anyone imagine Pakistan will ever be a peaceful neighbor?

Le bingo, Excal. Coexistence simply does not appear in Islam's vocabulary.
Posted by: Zenster    2007-10-27 16:28  

#2  I would be amazed if Iran does not already have the bomb. The real issue is testing and weaponizing said package such that it represents a sufficient threat to prevent their regime being bombed into the ground.

Though even that should not stop us. It would have been worth risking a city or two - if such were or are at risk - to nuke Pakistan into a sea of glass. But instead we let the Orcs carry on their work until there will be no turning them. Does anyone imagine Pakistan will ever be a peaceful neighbor? I have strong hopes for a normal Russia and even down the line a free China. Neither of those countries, or those cultures, are imprisoned by a death cult.

Tick. Tick. Tick.
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-10-27 09:24  

#1  No $hit! I wonder how many years they have to run all those centrifuges to get enough Uranium to build one bomb.
Posted by: gorb   2007-10-27 03:13  

00:00