You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Olmert: Iran has crossed red line for developing a nuclear weapon
2007-10-23
(Debka)

This is the message prime minister Ehud Olmert is carrying urgently to French President Nicolas Sarkozy Monday and British premier Gordon Brown Tuesday, according to DEBKAfileÂ’s military and intelligence sources.

Last week, Olmert placed the Israeli intelligence warning of an Iranian nuclear breakthrough before Russian president Vladimir Putin, while IsraelÂ’s defense minister Ehud Barak presented the updated intelligence on the advances Iran has made towards its goal of a nuclear weapon to American officials in Washington, including President Bush.

Olmert will be telling Sarkozy and Brown that the moment for diplomacy or even tough sanctions has passed. Iran can only be stopped now from going all the way to its goal by direct, military action.

Information of the Iranian breakthrough prompted the latest spate of hard-hitting US statements. Sunday, Oct. 21, US vice president Cheney said: "Our country, and the entire international community, cannot stand by as a terror-supporting state fulfills its grandest ambitions.''

Friday, the incoming Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Michael Mullen said US forces are capable of operations against Iran’s nuclear facilities or other targets. At his first news conference, he said: “I don’t think we’re stretched in that regard.”

It is worth noting that whereas OlmertÂ’s visits are officially tagged as part of IsraelÂ’s campaign for harsher sanctions against Iran, his trips are devoted to preaching to the converted, leaders who advocate tough measures including a military option; he has avoided government heads who need persuading, like German Chancellor Angela Merkel or Italian prime minister Romano Prodi.

The Israeli prime minister hurried over to Moscow last Thursday after he was briefed on the hard words exchanged between Putin and IranÂ’s supreme ruler Ayatollah Ali Khamenei in Tehran Tuesday, Oct. 16.

According to DEBKAfileÂ’s sources, the Russian leader warned the ayatollah that the latest development in IranÂ’s nuclear program prevented him from protecting Tehran from international penalties any longer; the clerical regimeÂ’s options were now reduced, he said, to halting its clandestine nuclear activities or else facing tough sanctions, or even military action.

The Russian rulerÂ’s private tone of speech was in flat contrast to his public denial of knowledge of Iranian work on a nuclear weapon. It convinced Olmert to include Moscow in his European itinerary.

Our sources in Iran and Moscow report that PutinÂ’s dressing-down of Khamenei followed by his three-hour conversation with the Israeli prime minister acted as catalysts for Iranian hardlinersÂ’s abrupt action in sweeping aside senior nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani Saturday, Oct. 20 and the Revolutionary Guards General Mahmoud ChaharbaghiÂ’s threat to fire 11,000 rockets and mortars at enemy targets the minute after Iran comes under attack.

Our military sources say Tehran could not manage to shoot off this number of projectiles on its own. Iran would have to co-opt allies and surrogates, Syria, Hizballah, Hamas and pro-Tehran militias in Iraq to the assault.

DEBKAfileÂ’s US military sources disclosed previously that if, as widely reported, Syria is in the process of building a small reactor capable of producing plutonium on the North Korean model, Iran must certainly have acquired one of these reactors before Syria, and would then be in a more advanced stage of plutonium production at a secret underground location.
Something I previously suggested.
Posted by:Anonymoose

#7  If Iran has it, I would be willing to bet it is sitting in the jungle someplace in Venezuela and not inside Iran.
Posted by: crosspatch   2007-10-23 23:28  

#6  Glenmore: not as much as you might think. The typical "3rd world nuclear weapon" of about 1000kg or less can be carried by augmented Shahab-3 missiles. Packing about a 25kt blast.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-10-23 12:00  

#5  Obtaining weapons grade U235 or Pu239 should not be too challanging for Iran, especially since they are not likely to be too worried about safety.
Building a nuclear device that will actually explode is also relatively straightforward.
Miniaturization is much, much more difficult. There are many things which must be done essentially to perfection or the bomb will lose its symmetry and 'fizzle.' That effort will almost certainly take some trials and errors - which we should be well able to detect. But without miniaturization, Iran's delivery system is likely limited to suicide trucks or boats.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-10-23 07:27  

#4  STRATEGYPAGE > IRAN: A LARGER THREAT THAN NUKES. Iran's neighbors [small states]nowadays worry notsomuch about per se Iranian nuke ambitions but more zabout Iran trying to take over non-Iranian territory incrementally, by bits and pieces. IRAN > FIGHTING A WOT INCREMENTALLY? WHILE ALSO TRYING TO BUILD AN EMPIRE INCREMENTALLY???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-10-23 04:39  

#3  JPOST > Israeli Ambassador > Very littel time remains to stop Iran from having a nuclear bomb, although diplomacy-negotiations are still preferred. Iran must get NOT the impression that come/after January 2009, when Dubya's POTUS successor takes office in Amer, that it can do what it wants or wills without fear.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-10-23 01:36  

#2  More than anything, we are total idiots to presume that warhead miniaturization and device to missile integration represent any sort of obstacles for Iran.

Anyone who is remotely sane must also consider that Iran might be just as happy to send a much less compact yet functional nuclear device on its merry way to our shores. Far fetched? Perhaps. Ask yourself, "Is this a risk you're willing to take?"

Crush Iran now. No delays, no excuses, no further risks.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-10-23 00:50  

#1  Iran has it! Not first time usa has been a sucker.
Posted by: Thererong Ghibelline1395   2007-10-23 00:40  

00:00