You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Submit your comments on this article
Home Front: Politix
IED's Threaten America - Bush Blamed
2007-10-20
Posted by:Bobby

#12  Consider the economic costs.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-10-20 23:14  

#11  I AM, however constantly surprised and pleased I don't own their stock by the New York Times, LOL
Posted by: Frank G   2007-10-20 21:46  

#10  I'm 48 old enough to match my expectations to low performance. The WaPo never hesitates to meet my expectations
Posted by: Frank G   2007-10-20 21:40  

#9  WaPo, Frank. What didja expect?
Posted by: Bobby   2007-10-20 21:38  

#8  g: the threat is real, I agree. However, any (right or left wing)nut with a pipebomb and clever triggering could do the same. It was apparent that:

a) they were paying valid and needed attention to the threat of importation of terror arms/people into doestic U.S.; and

b) they were prepping the ground to say "we told U so" should something happen;

c) all the while opposing any attempt at intelligence gathering via net/phones/profiling ...even while waiting to blame the Admin for failure to do so.

I call lying agenda/partisan-driven hijinx and all-aroiund ass-sucking MSM drivel

/rant
Posted by: Frank G   2007-10-20 21:36  

#7  #4 Frank G. I'm sure this is not was 'Moose (#2) meant.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-10-20 21:29  

#6  I blew up some stuff here at home and abroad.. does that count agin BUSH?
Posted by: Red Dawg   2007-10-20 21:08  

#5  The IED McVeigh used in Oklahoma City - was that Bush's fault?
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-10-20 21:03  

#4  #3 the threat they pose is insignificant
?????
Posted by: gromgoru

i.e.: "actually hasn't happened (yet), so we're saying/but downplaying/ it til we can pin a single American death at home on BushCo., then we'll wail away like a Canuck on a baby seal"
Posted by: Frank G   2007-10-20 20:58  

#3  the threat they pose is insignificant

?????
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-10-20 20:45  

#2  The rule of marginality comes into play. That is, there is no effective way of stopping the use of explosive devices in the US. However, the threat they pose is insignificant.

Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-10-20 17:42  

#1  but of course. If we closed Gitmo, this wouldn't happen
Posted by: Frank G   2007-10-20 17:30  

00:00