You have commented 340 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Mullen: U.S. can strike Iran if necessary
2007-10-20
U.S. military forces are capable of conducting operations against Iran if called on to bomb nuclear facilities or other targets, the new Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said yesterday. "From a military standpoint, there is more than enough reserve to respond if that, in fact, is what the national leadership wanted to do, and so I don't think we're too stretched in that regard," Adm. Michael Mullen told reporters when asked if current operations had worn out U.S. forces.

Adm. Mullen said he has been concerned over the past year and a half with Iranian leaders' statements of intentions, Tehran's support for bombers in Iraq and Iran's covert drive for nuclear weapons. "All of which has potentially a very destabilizing impact on a part of the world, a region of the world which is struggling in many ways already," he said in his first press conference since becoming chairman Oct. 1. "So they're not being helpful."

Defense and military officials have been preparing U.S. forces within striking distance of Iran. The forces would be dominated by Navy and Air Force weapons and forces since Army and Marine Corps forces are focused on Iraq and Afghanistan.
That's about right. The goal isn't to invade, occupy and reconstruct Iran: the Iranian people are perfectly capable of running their country once the Mad Mullahs™ are out of the way. And striking the nuclear complexes helps to accomplish that by showing how toothless the Mullahs are. Just beware the Revolutionary Guard.
There are two main targets of any Iranian military action, according to the officials. First, U.S. forces are set to attack Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps facilities because of the paramilitary's support and provision of armor-piercing roadside bombs. A U.S. official said the location of a factory where Iranian bomb materials are being produced has been identified.

A second target would be Iranian nuclear facilities, which are in numerous underground facilities across the country.

Adm. Mullen said Iran's support for terrorism "adds up to a huge and growing concern about Iran and where it's headed." "There is a significant amount of activity right now to try to influence them diplomatically," he said. The use of military force would be an option "of the last resort," Adm. Mullen said.

Adm. Mullen said many are working to try and influence Iranian leaders to move in a more positive direction. "But the concern that I have is very, very real."

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, appearing with Adm. Mullen at the Pentagon, warned about the dangers a nuclear-armed Iran poses to the Middle East. "If Iran acquires nuclear weapons, it seems very probable that there will be other states in the region that decide for their own protection they will have to obtain nuclear weapons as well," Mr. Gates said, likely triggering a "nuclear arms race in the Middle East."

Mr. Gates said as nuclear weapons materials and perhaps nuclear weapons become available in states that did not have them in the past "the risk of an accident or a miscalculation or of those weapons or materials falling into the hands of terrorists seem to me to be substantially increased." Nuclear weapons escalation in the Middle East would increase the risk of "a major war" in the region, he said.

"This is not to mention the fact that you've got a leader in Iran who has already publicly said that Israel ought to be destroyed," Mr. Gates said. "So let's just say that the leadership in Iran doesn't give us confidence, even by their public statements, that they would handle this kind of a capability with any kind of responsibility. And then when you add to that the proliferation part of the equation, it seems to me it ends up being a far more dangerous world."
Posted by:Steve White

#5  I'm currently reading Paul Theroux's "Riding the Iron Rooster". In it there is a Chinese expression that is most appropriate to the current situation with Iran. Executing someone to make an example for others is referred to as:

"Killing a chicken to scare the monkeys."

Evidently, Iraq wasn't enough. So, it's time to make sure the monkeys get very, very scared.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-10-20 15:20  

#4  Shoot, we've been arguing whether it's WWIII or WWIV. Rantburgers are a subtle folk.
Posted by: Whaigum Bucket8954   2007-10-20 14:45  

#3  Every muslim network was going apeshit over GWB's "WW-III" comment.

Rantburgers have been talking about WWW III for some time. Good for GWB. The muslims need to realize they can't do $hit with impunity--there is a price to pay and it might be very steep. They need to go apeshit some more. Maybe they will stop their bull$hit before they get destroyed.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-10-20 11:44  

#2  Was watching MOSAIC news on LinkTV. Every muslim network was going apeshit over GWB's "WW-III" comment.

Its good to make them think once in awhile.
Posted by: 3dc   2007-10-20 10:34  

#1  "Hey, we've got so many nukes that we're taking them out for a drive in the country. Hell, they're coming out of our ears. Just let us know when you want some of them. There's more than enough to go around."
Posted by: Zenster   2007-10-20 05:32  

00:00