| Submit your comments on this article | |
| Home Front: Culture Wars | |
| Unfit To Print? | |
| 2007-10-14 | |
| Every major daily paper in New York took note of President Bush's decision to bestow the first Medal of Honor of Operation Enduring Freedom on Navy SEAL Lt. Michael Murphy - a Long Islander who gave his life for his country and his fellow SEALs. Every paper but one, that is. And it shouldn't be particularly hard to guess which one. By now, most folks know exactly how much The New York Times despises the U.S. military. How it detests any mission that involves U.S. troops - whether to protect Americans by killing terrorists or to help stave off a bloodbath in the Middle East. How the paper works tirelessly to promote its anti-war, anti-military agenda - even in its supposedly objective news pages. So while Bush's announcement merited stories and appreciative editorials in The Post, The New York Sun, the Daily News and even the front page of liberal Newsday, it shouldn't be all that surprising that the Times didn't publish a single word about Murphy's well-deserved honor. What did the paper of record focus on yesterday? No fewer than three stories reported on how Americans had killed innocent Iraqi civilians. Regarding the war, of course, the Times' "coverage" was pernicious long before the fighting began. Since then, it has focused obsessively on the mistakes and sins of American GIs (Abu Ghraib, anyone?) - and rarely has it played up U.S. victories. Indeed, it would be hard to cite a news outlet more responsible for sapping U.S. morale - and emboldening America's enemies - than the Times. But Murphy was a New Yorker. He served with unusual valor and distinction in Afghanistan. When Taliban militants ambushed his four-man team in 2005, he risked his life scrambling to an open spot to radio for help. He got his call through, but was later killed in the battle. Surely even editors at the Times could have had the heart to report - if not honor - such courage and self-sacrifice. Unless, of course, they're so blinded by their disdain for America's fighting men and women and their missions that they just can't muster the decency to do so. That must be it.
| |
| Posted by:Steve White |
| #8 Local Newpaper MY SAN ANTONIO > end of article on immigration issue > "Iff you're reading this article, THANK A TEACHER; Iff you're reading this article in ENGLISH, THANK A VETERAN/SERVICEMEMBER". |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2007-10-14 22:34 |
| #7 Great graphic, doc! Pinchy pro'ly still prefers to think of himself as a 'world' citizen, not an American one. Too bad there's not some way of revoking his citizenship. PS: Tasty intellectual snark there, P2k. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2007-10-14 13:11 |
| #6 |
| Posted by: doc 2007-10-14 11:16 |
| #5 Yes, Bobby, but they'll point out they are "Plato's" caves, just to make sure we understand their intellectual authority hoping we don't notice that they're enthralled with the shadows. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2007-10-14 10:33 |
| #4 At this point I don't think that they are hurting themselves much. They seem to have dwindled down to a core readership that WANTS to hear about how badly we are losing in the ME. |
| Posted by: bigjim-ky 2007-10-14 10:25 |
| #3 While the remaining Times readers go farther back into their cave of ignorance and bliss. |
| Posted by: Bobby 2007-10-14 09:59 |
| #2 The new New York Times motto: "All the news that fits the narrative." |
| Posted by: Seafarious 2007-10-14 09:55 |
| #1 Ill-informed - a person who gets their news from the New York Times. |
| Posted by: DMFD 2007-10-14 04:51 |