You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
Six IED emplacers killed, planned attack disrupted
2007-10-14
Coalition Force helicopters killed six enemy fighters attempting to plant an improvised explosive device Oct. 8 near a major road in east Mosul. “These enemy fighters were in the act of placing an IED when our helicopters positively identified them, killed them and maintained observation on the area until ground forces arrived and removed the device, saving countless Iraqi and Coalition lives,” said Maj. Roderick Cunningham, spokesperson for the 4th Brigade Combat Team, 1st Cavalry Division.

Helicopters from the 4th Squadron, 6th Air Cavalry Regiment, stopped nine enemy fighters attempting to emplace a roadside bomb in the al-Sinaa neighborhood of east Mosul. Helicopters fired a Hellfire missile, killing two and forcing the others to flee.

Three additional individuals were attempting to escape to the west when they were engaged with 21 rockets and 40 rounds of 5.56 mm ammunition, killing all of them. Two more enemy fighters from the original group were discovered hiding in a nearby creek bed. The aircraft engaged them with an additional Hellfire missile, killing one.

A ground force from E Co., 2nd Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment was called to conduct a sweep of the area and find the IED that was being emplaced. They found a propane tank IED with an initiator in the middle of the road, as well as a 9mm pistol and a sledgehammer.

One enemy fighter was found wounded in critical condition and died en route to a combat support hospital, despite first aid administered at the scene by Coaltion Forces. Coalition explosive ordnance disposal specialists destroyed the IED where it was found.
Posted by:Fred

#13  They found a propane tank IED with an initiator in the middle of the road, as well as a 9mm pistol and a sledgehammer.

Does this mean we have disrupted the flow of IED high explosives from Iran? Does this mean the availability of high explosives in Iraq are starting to dry up? Or were these guys just using what was readily available?
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-10-14 18:09  

#12  "...as well as a 9mm pistol and a sledgehammer."

Hmmm, sledgehammers; the detonator of last resort.

.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2007-10-14 15:32  

#11  Heh, Frank!

Seems like we are seeing more reports of heli-zapping. I wonder if it is due to more jihadis getting ratted out while they are in the act, or due to more aerial surveillance. Or maybe just better reportage.
Posted by: SteveS   2007-10-14 14:36  

#10  Why not call them IED enablers ?
Posted by: wxjames   2007-10-14 13:41  

#9  "Emplacemats"
Posted by: Frank G   2007-10-14 12:20  

#8  WTF is emplacers?

From the article: "nine enemy fighters attempting to emplace a roadside bomb"

Another way not to say terrorists?

There is a difference. It's like calling marines, sailors, and airmen 'soldiers'.

But call them anything you want. I call 'em corpses.
Posted by: Pappy   2007-10-14 12:16  

#7  WTF is emplacers?

Another way not to say terrorists?
Posted by: twobyfour   2007-10-14 11:54  

#6  Â“These enemy fighters were in the act of placing an IED when our helicopters positively identified them, killed them and maintained observation on the area until ground forces arrived and removed the countless body parts the device, saving countless Iraqi and Coalition lives,”
Posted by: Sigmund Freud   2007-10-14 10:19  

#5  You can be sure that most journalists are neither interested in nor capable of understanding the difference.

[chuckle] Candidate for Snark of the Week?
Posted by: Bobby   2007-10-14 09:55  

#4  Maybe it was a cool straffing run. Waiting to see it on YouTube.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2007-10-14 08:38  

#3  the rockets couldn't be too expensive considering they did their jobs and our troops weren't hurt by the bomb
Posted by: sinse   2007-10-14 07:38  

#2  The rockets were probably Hydra 70 folding fin attack rocets. They have no guidence system (so far!). It is unusual, but the pilot may have elected to Salvo an entire pod, after one or two spotter rounds. If so, Wheee!

Part of the confusion is that for the military, rocket implies no guidence system after launch, while missile implies that the weapon can modify it's trajectory after launch. example: a hellfire missile has a seeker head that homes in on a spot of reflected laser energy. A Hydra 70 rocket is a powered ballistic projectile guided only by Sir Issac Newton.

You can be sure that most journalists are neither interested in nor capable of understanding the difference.
Posted by: N guard   2007-10-14 07:10  

#1  That's terrible! How did that one guy get away? :-)

Too bad it took 21 rockets to get those three guys. Seems like it could be pretty expensive. Don't we have something that can home in on motion like that? Or are they some kind of cheap dumb rockets?
Posted by: gorb   2007-10-14 02:58  

00:00