It caused some controversy, but it was supposed to. Now, one man is headed to municipal court for burning a Mexican flag in protest in front of the Alamo. This is not a joke. The racist ("razista") hypocrites who run San Antonio are seriously rubbing American faces in the double standard from which they so openly benefit here in Texas.
The city is charging 46-year old David Bohmfalk with burning without a permit, even though no one gives permits to burn a flag.
"I was raised to respect my country," Bohmfalk said.
All the rallies and talk of amnesty for undocumented immigrants in May 2006 lit the fires of patriotism for Bohmfalk, he said. "I just got angry," he said. "I decided I had to do something, make my statement, and that's what I did."
Bohmfalk had his own protest in front of a building known for revolution, where Davy Crockett and James Bowie made a stand. So did Bohmfalk but he used a lighter instead of gunfighter. Park police cited Bohmfalk for illegal burning of rubbish, even if it was a Mexican flag he set ablaze.
Rubbish???? Even the Reconquista occupation regime of San antonio can tell the manifest truth once in a while.
"Because of what it's made out of, it took a little while to burn it. It took me two minutes, but I got it lit," Bohmfalk
Authorities say his actions left some of the Mexican nationals in the Alamo crowd feeling burned. However, Bohmfalk's attorney, Jason Jakob, says, freedom of speech is Bohmfalk's constitutional right. "My client felt so strongly, and exercised protest, by burning that flag," Jakob said.
| You can burn an American flag but you can't burn a Mexican one ... |
That's US law, not the law (such as it is) of San Antonio Reconquista.
"In America, every day we see people burning the American flag and it's become desensitized," Jakob said. "If we can allow that, we can certainly say that the Mexican flag can be burned."
Not if you're a brain-dead leftist (excuse the redundancy) collaborator or sycophant. According to them, the US is an oppressive nation-state while Mexico is an underprivileged neighborhood or a dysfunctional family or perhaps (in truth) a holding area for future left-conformist voters.
As a former Texas police chief and military veteran, Bohmfalk says he knows his rights, and is fighting for them. "Why should a foreign flag get any better protection than the American flag?" he said.
According to racist invaders and their sycophants on the political left, it is because burning the Mexican flag is racism while burning the Stars and Stripes is a protest against imperialism.
The city has not returned calls for comment.
They left out "Oprima el 'uno' para Ingles"
As for Bohmfalk's right to a speedy trial, that's been delayed as well. His trial has been reset three times.
Excuse me? What country is this again?
"Constitution? We don't got no stinkin' constitution! We don't need no constitution!"
This is unbelievably loathsome and disgusting. It is apparently only legal to burn American flags, even in the United States.
Santa Ana came a cropper but it looks like a Mexican dictator is back in charge in San Antonio after all. The occupied city of San Antonio is engaged in naked racism, hypocrisy, and abridgment of the Constitution, while the craven Arbusto regime in Washington stands idly by and lets it happen.
In a Constitutionally ruled country, federal marshals would be sent to San Antonio to arrest these racist hypocrite officials and throw them in their own jail for abridging Bomfalk's First Amendment rights.
Remember the Alamo, remember Goliad, and hypocrites from La Raza (Las Razistas) would do well to remember Buena Vista and Chapultepec. Your left-liar sycophants can only cover for you so long. Time is just about up.