You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Of freedom and fascism in America
2007-10-05
WHO'S afraid of Naomi Wolf?
I think most of us vaguely remember her, the gal who told Al Gore to wear earth tones and to be macho.
If her latest book keeps rising through the US bestseller lists, then the Bush administration should not just be afraid, but very afraid.
I doubt Bush is losing any sleep. Nobody has to tell him to be macho.
Wolf is calling for American citizens to rise up in a bloggers' revolution to push back what she calls "a fascist shift" in her homeland.
"Fascist" to Naomi and her ilk means Republicans. I don't see Republican storm troopers marching around thumping people, though I do see a lot of masked anarchists conductng Kristallnachten every time there's a major summit conference, and I do see a lot of Goebbels-like propaganda produced by the Democrats, to include the book under discussion.
She compares the present situation in the US with the early days of Mussolini, Stalin and, if you're still not convinced, Hitler.
Don't they all? Nobody ever compares the current situation in the U.S. with, for instance, northern Italy when the condotierri were in their heyday, or 1688 England, or Russia during the 17th century. It's always "Help, help! The Nazis are coming!" It's never "Help, help! The Sforzas are coming!" or "Help! Help! The Papists are coming!" or "Help! Help! It's Charles XII!" My imagination's not remotely flexible enough to produce any kind of correspondence between the U.S. of today the Italy that gave rise to Mussolini. Bush as pre-Yezhovschchina Stalin is simply ludicrous.
The End of America (Scribe, $24.95) is as much a personal story of how Naomi Wolf's life has changed since September 11, 2001, as it is her country's.
Maybe she should serialize it in Modern Romances.
From 2002, Wolf became a critic of the Bush administration.
The way that sentence is constructed, it implies that prior to 2002 she was a Bush supporter or at least neutral. In fact, she was a Dem partisan and an advisor to Al Gore, just not one of his better advisors. Perhaps that was because of her penchant for hysteria. Or maybe it was her habit of finding Nazis under her bed.
Her view was that even dissent was part of being American, part of the great democracy that thrived on argument and openness.
Ohfergawdsake. Dissent for the sake of dissent is mere carping. It has no intrinsic virtue. It is not brave, especially in a society where it's not going to land you in jug. Even in a society where it'll land you in jug, though, it's stoopid to dissent with no reason. If you were a Sov, and you dissented from, for instance, the Bol'shoi Opera, or the running of the Trans Siberian Railway, or the launch of Sputnik, then maybe you deserved a few weeks in Lubyanka.
At first, it was Muslim men boarding planes who encountered problems.
There was no problem for the community at large, mind you. Just the mild curiosity over whether the guys with the turbans were gonna fly whatever plane they were boarding into another building full of screaming innocents.
Now, the force of security measures are being felt by people such as Wolf: white, Jewish and female. She believes she is being targeted because she has become a critic of the administration.
Sounds like she's suffering from delusions of adequacy. And maybe over-categorization. White, Jewish males aren't feeling it, obviously; only the females. Oriental Jewish females aren't. White Episcopalian females certainly aren't feeling it, though white Seventh Day Adventist females might be. I don't have a reading on the Samoan Lutheran females or Cambodian Lesser Vehicle Buddhist males yet, but they're in the mail.
She found that most times she travelled through airports (nine out of 10, she calculates) she would be taken aside for questioning. Then she discovered she was on a watch list. After one trip, she discovered her suitcase had been opened and a letter from Homeland Security placed next to her computer.
Right. If I was gonna search her baggage for incriminating evidence of whatever it is she thinks she might be suspected of, I'd leave a letter next to her computer to cover my tracks.
Wonder if she framed the letter ...
My wife got the same letter last time she flew. It said "This bag was opened by Homeland Security". Wonder if I better keep an eye on her.
She heard that 250,000 Americans had been sent secret letters telling them they were under national security investigation and that they could not discuss the letters with anyone.
250,000 Americans have received secret letters that they're not supposed to discuss with anyone. Right. And they all took the warning seriously, except for Naomi Wolf, who's too Brave™ to keep her mouth shut.
She says security officials are beginning to walk through airports yelling "Freeze!" when they spot someone they consider suspicious.
"Really. They do. I seen it!"
People are increasingly being taken to holding cells at airports for interrogation.
"Another one, Schultz! Get me my truncheon!"
"Jawohl, mein Süpervisör!"
Wolf began to study the lead-up to dictatorships: the laws, language and tactics of Italy in the '20s; Hitler's National Socialists in the 1930s; East Germany in the '50s; Czechoslovakia in 1968; Chile in 1973; China in the '80s. "What was clear is that there is a blueprint for closing down a democracy and that Hitler studied Mussolini, Stalin studied Hitler. These guys all learned from each other." She found 10 common steps to the suspension of a democracy, then started ticking off those occurring in the US.
The ten points are mercifully not enumerated in the text...
The US is obviously not where Italy, Germany, Czechoslovakia or Chile were, but an "incremental process" is under way.
It's perfectly visible to people with the right kind of training, if you look at it from just the right angle...
She invokes the Founding Fathers, who saw tyranny as eternal but democracy as "vanishingly fragile".
The Founding Fathers were pretty dismissive of democracy, not having a lotta trust in the demos. They favored a republic, and for pretty good reason. Having dumped the requirement for voters to be land owners, thereby relieving them of the requirement to have an investment in the nation, the republic's becoming more evanescent by the day. Naomi's not bitchng and moaning about that, though.
The book doesn't hold back.
Neither does a 3-year-old having a temper tantrum...
"It is hard to think of another policy goal that this administration has pursued with such single-minded focus as it has legalised torture," she writes.
There's a difference between torture and rough treatment. However, if they need anybody to take a welding torch to various parts of Khalid Sheikh Mohammad or Ramzi bin al-Shibh, or Abu Zubaydah, I'm available.
"This elaborate push to torture brown people to confess to crimes they didn't commit makes political sense — even though it should make the moral sense recoil."
What the hell "brown" people is she talking about? Are the Ecuadorians involved? Surely she's not talking about Ramzi? He's a Yemeni Arab. Arabs are similar to Italians and Greeks and Spaniards in overall appearance, despite the obvious amount of inbreeding that went into producing him. Keep their mouths shut and you can't tell 'em apart. KSM is an ethnic Baloch, if I recall, which is not a "little brown man" but a primitive white guy with a turban and an AK, kinda like the Bugtis. Abu Zubaydah's a Paleostinian, another of those Mediterranean types. So precisely which bad guyz is she referring to? And who told Naomi they didn't do it? Weasley Clark? Al Gore?
Wolf discovered many other critics of the administration were on the watch list, including one of America's leading constitutional scholars, and two elderly women who run an anti-war movement.
There's paragraph after paragraph of this claptrap. It seems to go on forever. Naomi apparently lacks an original bone in her body. Her arguments, especially as interpreted by the writer, are specious. Or maybe the word I'm looking for is "tendentious." Or even "tedious." The whole article, and Naomi's book with it, are useless except as a snapshot of what the political atmosphere's degenerated to since 9-11. Or maybe since the McKinley administration.
Posted by:Fred

#29  Hey! Didn't the REAL fascists wear earth tones? Hmmmm.
Posted by: WTF   2007-10-05 21:50  

#28  Fascism? What's her working definition? In Mussolini's infamous definition of the ideological concept in the Enciclopedia Italiana he wrote, "The Fascist conception of the State is all-embracing, outside of it no human or spiritual values can exist, much less have value. Thus understood, Fascism is totalitarian, and the Fascist State - a synthesis and a unit inclusive of all values - interprets, develops, and potentiates the whole of a people."

Fascism is secular islam. The President verbally attacked "Islamofascism" only once, then bowed to CAIR/ISNA correctitude. I don't treat Islamofascism as invective; it is the ideology of the worst menace ever to threaten Western Civilization. And the menace is compounded when the enemy has Fifth Columnists like Wolf-Bitch.
Posted by: McZoid   2007-10-05 19:13  

#27  China in the '80s

The hell?

This is just more cheerleading for the left. They're working themselves up for the Rage(tm) next year.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2007-10-05 18:21  

#26  
Posted by: Zenster   2007-10-05 17:21  

#25  "Apparently the dark night of fascism is always descending on America and landing on Naomi Klein."

Yeah, I'm old enough to remember the dark night of fascism descending several times over the decades, strangely coinciding with every time a Republican was elected president. It's a little like that clock that the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists had. They were always pushing it a little closer to midnight, since Armageddon was always just around the corner. But Armageddon never came and eventually it got so close to midnight they couldn't show it moving any closer, so they had to back it up some.
Posted by: moody blues   2007-10-05 15:32  

#24  Oh, and another thing:

Also there is a a special horror in Hitler's crimes: no matter what you did good or bad, you were going to Auschwitz for the mere fact of being born from the wrong race. No escape. With Stalin you could at least try to cheer at his speeches and feign to believe that Soviet Union was a parsdise. And new borns weren't sent to Gulag.

A lot of what Stalin did (oh, for instance, the artificial famines in Ukraine, or the deportation to Siberian camps of the entire population of Chechnya) looks racially motivated if you ask me.

BTW, about half the population of Chechnya survived the experience.
Posted by: Abdominal Snowman   2007-10-05 14:50  

#23  China in the '80s.

I call BS on this one. China was well on it's way to DOOOM long before the 80's. Maybe she's trying to correlate the "rise" of communism there to Tiannamen Square???
Posted by: BA   2007-10-05 14:11  

#22  What amazes me is how easy it would be for the Federal Government, or even some rogue element in the government to mess with her and have it look like an accident. I'm not even talking assassination, books are often published in Singapore and replacing pages to make her look the fool would seem fairly easy if you ask me.

Yet the proto-fascist state sits back and watches her book go up the best seller list. Well if we're fascists, or fascist wanna-bes we're not very freaking good at it I can tell you that.

I think the left has real trouble understanding that their message is unacceptable to most people and thus they don't always win elections.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-10-05 12:08  

#21  Apparently the dark night of fascism is always fdescending on America and landing on Naomi Klein.
Posted by: Seafarious   2007-10-05 10:39  

#20  So why hasn't Naomi been picked up yet by Bush's Blackwater goons and sent to some kinda camp in the all new facist America for letting everybody in on "the secret"?
Not a bad looking woman. But, then again, the crazy ones never looked it...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-10-05 10:35  

#19  WHO'S afraid of Virginia Woof Naomi Wolf?

All of us who recognize that she is amongst those comparatively few "citizens" who feel Dead Set Entitled to Run America.

Fred: I think most of us vaguely remember her, the gal who told Al Gore to wear earth tones and to be macho.

Color her Bozo.
Posted by: Red Dawg   2007-10-05 10:26  

#18  Not that I am fond of Uncle Joe but you have to correlate with time in power and population (it is difficult to kill lots of people when you are dictator of, say, the Fiji Islands or Luxembourg°; Stalmin had much more of both.

Yah, but the only big difference there is that Stalin was a successful imperialist while Hitler was a failed one. It's not like Stalin woke up one morning and said "All these millions of people! What will I do with them?!?" He worked to gain and keep control of that large population.
Posted by: Abdominal Snowman   2007-10-05 10:15  

#17  Wasn't she here a few weeks back declaring that Tazered Boy in Florida was the start of the Revolution?
Quick, Naomi! What was his name?
Posted by: tu3031   2007-10-05 09:55  

#16  Well, if I can say something in her defense, she did have one clear and shining moment of mostly-sanity in "Fire with Fire", in which she argued that doctrinaire hard-line capital "F" feminism had turned into something ugly.man-hating and controlling of other womens' lives in the name of so-called female solidarity.

She argued that women should stop the hell thinking of themselves as poor widdle abused victims - that we are strong, confident and pretty damned diverse (in political views, religon, economic outlooks, etc) and should start acting like grownups.

It was a bit of fresh air, actually. I don't know what happened to her after that; changed meds, maybe. Or perhaps the minions of doctrinaire Feminism put a horse head in her bed.
Posted by: Sgt. Mom   2007-10-05 09:44  

#15  Wow. That woman needs some serious meds.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-10-05 09:38  

#14  Why do so many on the left suffer from such deep Freudian projection?

"Mommy, Tommy hit me."
"No fair, you hit me first."

Still haven't "progressed" much beyond that, have they.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-10-05 08:48  

#13   At first, it was Muslim men boarding planes who encountered problems.

It's interesting that Ms. Wolf picks this as evidence of creeping fascism. I flew on a lot of planes not long after 9/11, and I've never seen finer evidence of participatory democracy than the looks exchanged among passengers on those flights: 7A: You see him? 7D: Yeah, I see him. 8D: If this sumbitch twitches he's taking the emergency exit. Nobody said a word out loud, but George Washington would have been proud.
Posted by: Matt   2007-10-05 08:07  

#12  Fred, as usual, brilliant comments.
Posted by: Broadhead6   2007-10-05 06:55  

#11  It should also be pointed out that this may be simply a continuation of Ms Wolf's embarrassingly public midlife crisis/mini-breakdown from a couple of years back.

In a span of a few weeks, she was seen groping a disgusted David Horowitz on a cable panel discussion, and writing a bizarre article in which she claimed that young men's preference for sexual variety and women with trimmed/coiffed nether regions was some type of oppression and that all men should just get down on their knees, be supremely arounsed, and thank G*d for the sight of a naked woman (read, Naomi's nakedness) regardless of her state of hygiene, hirsuteness, or sexual adventurousness.

Insecure much?

I guess if women in general and Naomi in particular aren't in absolute control and making the rules in every situation, that's the same as fascism (/sarcasm off).
Posted by: no mo uro   2007-10-05 06:16  

#10  Wolf is calling for American citizens to rise up in a bloggers' .....cloggers revolution to push back what she calls "a fascist shift" in her homeland
Posted by: Besoeker   2007-10-05 06:16  

#9  "Help! Help! It's Charles XII!"

Best laugh of the morning--and a righteous fisking, to boot!
Posted by: Mike   2007-10-05 06:06  

#8  "What was clear is that there is a blueprint for closing down a democracy and that Hitler studied Mussolini, Stalin studied Hitler. These guys all learned from each other."

Translation: I always resented older generations for having the cache of victimhood more so than me, and now's my chance to claim equal victim status and the street cred that goes with it.
Posted by: no mo uro   2007-10-05 05:38  

#7  stalin was the first and the worst of the two

Not that I am fond of Uncle Joe but you have to correlate with time in power and population (it is difficult to kill lots of people when you are dictator of, say, the Fiji Islands or Luxembourg°; Stalmin had much more of both.

Also there is a a special horror in Hitler's crimes: no matter what you did good or bad, you were going to Auschwitz for the mere fact of being born from the wrong race. No escape. With Stalin you could at least try to cheer at his speeches and feign to believe that Soviet Union was a parsdise. And new borns weren't sent to Gulag.

Now Stalin killed more people but Hitler was the Antechrist incarnated.
Posted by: JFM   2007-10-05 04:54  

#6  Stalin studied Hitler.

IIUC, it's exactly the reverse; not only had uncle joe an hand in propping up uncle adolf, but the nazis modelled their early concentration camps on the gulag, which was up and running long before them, and ditto for the political police. Like it or not, but stalin was the first and the worst of the two, ultimately, when hitler barely got to power, the ruskie already had something like 10-12 millions deaths on his resume.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2007-10-05 04:38  

#5  What a rag.
Posted by: newc   2007-10-05 01:14  

#4  REDDIT.com > WE HAVE WAR CRIMINALS IN THE WHITE HOUSE - WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT IT!?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-10-05 00:57  

#3  I think she was the one who would not allow her daughter to fly an American flag from her window after 9/11. Or was that Katha Politt?
Posted by: Eric Jablow   2007-10-05 00:44  

#2  I suspect Naomi's book is a paen to her personal narcissism.

Hagged out and washed out...
Posted by: badanov   2007-10-05 00:42  

#1  ...her penchant for hysteria.

I read The Beauty Myth. I believe I pronounced it "the biggest pile of tripe since Chariots of the Gods." (Actually, I kind of liked Chariots of the Gods.)

I expected The Beauty Myth to say something along the lines of "Gals, you're being played for saps." Instead it was more, "Oh, you poor dears! You weak, helpless, mindless creatures are being lied to by Big Beauty! What ever will we do??" Phooey.

"Another one, Schultz! Get me my truncheon!"
The everyday truncheon, Herr Oberst, or the double-wide?
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2007-10-05 00:36  

00:00