You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Juror refusing to vote in terrorist-financing trial
2007-10-04
The Dallas trial of a charity accused of financing Middle Eastern terrorists took a twist Wednesday when jurors indicated that a member of the panel was refusing to vote.
refusing out of fear?
Jurors in the case against the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development were called back into the courtroom of U.S. District Judge A. Joe Fish, who told panelists they had a duty to try to reach a decision. The judge ordered jurors to resume their deliberations, which were in their ninth full day after a two-month trial.

Holy Land and five of its former leaders are accused of illegally aiding the Palestinian militant group Hamas, which the U.S. government designated a terrorist organization in 1995. Holy Land was the largest U.S. Muslim charity when the government shut it down in December 2001.

None of the jurors spoke during the brief hearing in open court, and the judge did not identify which one was refusing to deliberate.
Posted by:PlanetDan

#5  Does the judge know about dismissing the joker, and seating an alternate?

I'm sure he/she does, but liberal appellate courts have set enough precedent that the judge also knows that doing so without exhausting every other possibility is just asking for problems.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2007-10-04 13:40  

#4  Does the judge know about dismissing the joker, and seating an alternate?
Posted by: BigEd   2007-10-04 13:19  

#3  OOJ.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2007-10-04 10:09  

#2  Sounds like someone committed perjury doing the voir dire process.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-10-04 09:49  

#1  Not voting at all is not an option.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-10-04 08:42  

00:00