You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
UN Human Rights Council: NGO mention of “Allah” taboo
2007-10-01
Posted by:anonymous5089

#10  The Arabs like to claim they can't possibly be antisemitic, being a semitic people themselves. They like to ignore the fact that the term antisemite was invented by a German because the term Judenhass (Jew hatred) had become declasse. Philology/linguistics was then all the rage, so he borrowed the classification from the professors.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-10-01 23:12  

#9  One paragraph stood out for it's idiocy:

“Accomodation of Muslims and their religious aspirations in the Western world will create space for political and social harmony. All is not dark. Enlightened communities and opinion leaders in Europe and North America are trying to steer their societies in that direction. It is, however, surprising that in many instances Holocaust survivors, instead of promoting such harmony, are campaigning against Muslim symbols in the Western world. They should be the most ardent advocates against discrimination. Islamophobia is also a crude form of Anti-Semitism."

1. All the west has been doing is "accomodating" muslims. It has led to more terror, more bloodshed, and more tragedy. To hell with accomodation. All is indeed dark, as far as any hope that muzzies and the free world can co-exist in any semblance of peace and harmony. They've already more than proven their inability to play nice with humanity.

2. Holocaust survivors are against all this accomodation talk with muzzies because being singled out as a race of people to be annihilated, both in the words of the Imams, and the words of that filthy rag the Koran, will tend to make you a bit hostile.

3. So-called "islamophobia" is as far from anti-semitism as night is from day. To be against a religion because it has the nasty habit of going around butchering people in the name of it's pedophile prophet and bloodthirsty moon god has no resemblance whatsoever to wanting an entire race of people destroyed. Besides, who in their right mind doesn't know that Islam is by nature, contant and practice, the ultimate form of Anti-semitism?

Just another outrageous example that the UN is an utterly clueless, anti-semitic pack of clowns.

Posted by: mcsegeek1   2007-10-01 21:04  

#8  It would now seem that the mention of “Allah” – even when quoted from the Charter of Hamas or from other Jihadist statements – would be considered unwise unless used as a blessing by Member States of the OIC.

Taqiyya posing as thought control. This is nothing more or less than the same reverse bigotry of how blacks think they have exclusive right to use the word "nigger", yet can demonize anyone else who does.

If anyone still doubts the use of the term “genocide” we would advise reading the relevant passages, especially the lethal article 7 – and articles 22 and 32 that refer at length to that infamous century-old forgery, The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. It uses almost the identical words of Adolf Hitler. Article 13 makes it doubly clear why peace is impossible with a Hamas-led Palestine: “Initiatives, and so-called peaceful solutions and international conferences, are in contradiction to the principles of the Islamic Resistance Movement. (...) There is no solution to the Palestinian question except by Jihad. All initiatives, proposals, and International Conferences are a waste of time and vain endeavours.”

Unless someone else is picking up the lunch tab.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-10-01 19:15  

#7  There is no greater oxymoron than the United Nations Human Rights Commission.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2007-10-01 17:44  

#6  You, sir, are out of order!
Kindly refrain from questions until the proper question and answer period. At least have the common courtesy to wait until after we have perused our dessert menus and placed our orders.
Thank you.
Posted by: Chairman:UNHRC   2007-10-01 15:40  

#5  "Mr. Chairman, point of order!... What about references to 'Muhammad, the notorious bastard offspring of a brain-damaged monkey and a diseased pig?'"
Posted by: mojo   2007-10-01 15:29  

#4  So, let it be the policy of the Council henceforth that all references to the individual commonly known as "Allah" will instead be referred to as "That Guy". All in favor?
Mr. Chairman, I object in no uncertain terms! We haven't even had lunch yet!
I'll allow that. Members of the Council, debate is opened on the proposal. Shall the Council have lunch catered or should the limos be brought around for a fact finding mission on possible human rights violations at Tavern on the Green? All in favor...
Posted by: tu3031   2007-10-01 13:18  

#3  from the description at the link, not only is that claim taqqiya, but the UN move is deliberate lawfare against those who expose Islamicism for what it really is.
Posted by: lotp   2007-10-01 13:16  

#2  But we're being told Allah was merely the Arabic word for God, and that Arabic-speaking Jews and Christians are accustomed to use it so, not the sole property of the Muslim religion. Taqiyya, it seems.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-10-01 12:28  

#1  Allah loves little boys and Allah pokes pigs up the pooper.

That un-PC enough for ya, assholes?
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-10-01 10:33  

00:00