You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Missteps in the Minot Bunker
2007-09-23
Just after 9 a.m. on Aug. 29, a group of U.S. airmen entered a sod-covered bunker on North Dakota's Minot Air Force Base with orders to collect a set of unarmed cruise missiles bound for a weapons graveyard. At 9:12 a.m. local time on Aug. 29, according to the account, ground crews in two trucks entered a gated compound at Minot known as the Weapons Storage Area and drove to an igloo where the cruise missiles were stored. The 21-foot missiles were already mounted on pylons, six apiece in clusters of three, for quick mounting to the wings of a B-52.

The AGM-129 is designed to carry silver W-80-1 nuclear warheads, which have a variable yield of between 5 and 150 kilotons. (A kiloton is equal to the explosive force of 1,000 tons of TNT.)
This is important new information for WaPo readers.
The warheads were meant to have been removed from the missiles before shipment. In their place, crews were supposed to insert metal dummies of the same size and weight, but a different color, so the missiles could still be properly attached under the bomber's wings.

A munitions custodian officer is supposed to keep track of the nuclear warheads. In the case of cruise missiles, a stamp-size window on the missile's frame allows workers to peer inside to check whether the warheads within are silver. In many cases, a red ribbon or marker attached to the missile serves as an additional warning.
This information is provided by the WaPo in the event you ever want to hijack an AGM-129
Finally, before the missiles are moved, two-man teams are supposed to look at check sheets, bar codes and serial numbers denoting whether the missiles are armed.

Why the warheads were not noticed in this case is not publicly known. But once the missiles were certified as unarmed, a requirement for unique security precautions when nuclear warheads are moved -- such as the presence of specially armed security police, the approval of a senior base commander and a special tracking system -- evaporated.

The warheads were attached to the plane in Minot without special guard for more than 15 hours, and they remained on the plane in Louisiana for nearly nine hours more before being discovered. In total, the warheads slipped from the Air Force's nuclear safety net for more than a day without anyone's knowledge.

"I have been in the nuclear business since 1966 and am not aware of any incident more disturbing," retired Air Force Gen. Eugene Habiger, who served as U.S. Strategic Command chief from 1996 to 1998, said in an interview.

A simple error in a missile storage room led to missteps at every turn, as ground crews failed to notice the warheads, and as security teams and flight crew members failed to provide adequate oversight and check the cargo thoroughly. An elaborate nuclear safeguard system, nurtured during the Cold War and infused with rigorous accounting and command procedures, was utterly debased, the investigation's early results show.

The incident came on the heels of multiple warnings -- some of which went to the highest levels of the Bush administration, including the National Security Council -- of security problems at Air Force installations where nuclear weapons are kept. The risks are not that warheads might be accidentally detonated, but that sloppy procedures could leave room for theft or damage to a warhead, disseminating its toxic nuclear materials.
Posted by:Nimble Spemble

#8  A simple error in a missile storage room led to missteps at every turn, as ground crews failed to notice the warheads, and as security teams and flight crew members failed to provide adequate oversight and check the cargo thoroughly. An elaborate nuclear safeguard system, nurtured during the Cold War and infused with rigorous accounting and command procedures, was utterly debased, the investigation's early results show.

Can't you just hear the flapping sound of so much hand-wringing?

America has the single finest track record in the entire world for the good stewardship of such a massive nuclear arsenal. One look at Russia's conduct with respect to this subject makes us look like the consummate professionals that we are.

All of this is the usual boatload of hysterical luddite twaddle.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-09-23 17:56  

#7  Greenpeace has a series of drawings on their website that resemble the W80

From a FAS hosted article
link

Greenpeace website
link
link

FAS website
link
Posted by: john frum   2007-09-23 16:41  

#6  "One of the major principles of nuclear weapons is that when you become aware of a security flaw, you never, ever mention it to the public. And when it does become known, you do what you can to lessen its impact with skilled public information officers.

You never try to make an issue of it, unless a Republican is in the White House."

There - fixed that for ya', 'moose.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2007-09-23 16:30  

#5  This still impresses me as being peculiar. Not that the event happened, but that so much is being made of it. One of the major principles of nuclear weapons is that when you become aware of a security flaw, you never, ever mention it to the public. And when it does become known, you do what you can to lessen its impact with skilled public information officers.

You never try to make an issue of it.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-09-23 15:49  

#4  leave room for theft

The WaPo issues a pre-emptive warning: if a nuclear reaction wipes out part of some US city, we shouldn't jump to conclusions that it was done by an enemy or something .... it's probably our Own Fault.
Posted by: lotp   2007-09-23 15:45  

#3  Whoops. Thanks Bobby.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2007-09-23 15:29  

#2  May I assist? Link
Posted by: Bobby   2007-09-23 14:54  

#1  Wrong link, Nimble.
Posted by: Glenmore   2007-09-23 13:57  

00:00