You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
World should 'prepare for the worst' over Iran: France
2007-09-17
I thought that was Cheney's line.
The world should "prepare for the worst ... (which) is war" over the Iranian nuclear crisis, but seeking a solution through talks should take priority, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said on Sunday.

"We have to prepare for the worst, and the worst is war," he said in an interview broadcast on television and radio. "We must negotiate right to the end," with Iran, he said, but underlined that if Tehran possessed an atomic weapon, it would represent "a real danger for the whole world."
Posted by:Steve White

#15  Surge in Iraq will have played out shortly, if the Shiites come on-line as nicely as the Sunni tribes did.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-09-17 18:56  

#14  Surge in Iraq needs to play out first.
Posted by: lotp   2007-09-17 18:46  

#13  I cannot believe the administration is truly planning...creating an WARNINGORDER/OPORDER...to attack Iran. We have all sorts of OPLANS and CONPLANS as part of Crisis Action Planning (CAP). However, I would be willing to bet a large sum of money that we are not working on WARNINGORDERS/OPORDERS on Iran.
Posted by: anymouse   2007-09-17 14:23  

#12  Who says that Reagan was ineffective? The Gipper kept his presidency very simple. He had three goals:

1) Lower taxes.
2) Rebuild the military.
3) Break the Russians once and for all

That's what he said he would do, and that's what he did.
Posted by: Secret Master   2007-09-17 13:09  

#11  I'd sooner a Chiraq who fixed France's internals. Then the rest would follow. Based on what you're saying, Sarko will be even less effective than was Reagan.
Posted by: Nimble Spemble   2007-09-17 12:56  

#10  France is under new management.

What a beautiful statement. :-)


Not that sarko will solve any of France's woes; what he's done so far in the crucial first 100 days shows he intends to keep the system afloat, not reform it, and is still pure PR as opposed to concrete action (it seems like his team had no idea nor planning when coming to power).
Still, for an american, he will not be shirak, that will be a tremendous improvement, no doubt.
Posted by: anonymous5089   2007-09-17 12:10  

#9  France is under new management.

What a beautiful statement. :-)
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-09-17 11:31  

#8  Context:

France is under new management. Applying to the new administration derived from DeGaulle-Chirac policy is about as absurd that thinking Truamn would be as silly as FDR respctive to to Stalin


Kouchner prefaced a a book about Saddam's crimes and defended the invasion something who amke him a patriah between in France's political landscape. And then Sarkozy nmintaed this pariah as foreign minister.

Out of nostalgia for Louis XIV and Napoleon time De Gaulle (and successors) could have liked to France into a positioon of being the referee between East and West or increasoing influence by allying with the most repugnant third world dictators nad genociders in planet (Amin Husseini liberated by De Gaulle in 1945, Khomeini protected by Giscard, Chirac and Saddam) but there are chances that Sarkozy didn't feel nostalgia for Louis XIV but instead, shame for France pandering with opressors in Hungary and elsewhere.
Posted by: JFM   2007-09-17 11:01  

#7  What Gorb said.
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-09-17 10:22  

#6  You know when you get a guy like Kouchner talking like this it makes you wonder if these so-called intellectuals in Europe have been reading Mark Steyn. If only Merkel had the same sense of urgency and survival for her country that Kouchner and Sarkozy have for France.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-09-17 09:33  

#5  Affraid, Joe? Nope. It has to be done over with. Sure will suck. But a childs play compared with what awaits if the game is postponed until Ahmadinutjob can unleash his Mehdigeddon.
Posted by: twobyfour   2007-09-17 07:15  

#4  WORLDNEWS > BE VERY AFRAID OF THE US-IRANIAN GAME OF CHICKEN IN THE GULF. Mother of all Mutual Escalationisms - Syria actually fears an Israeli attack agz it vv Iran-controlled/suppor Lebanese terror groups should an Israel-Iran war break out. Also in WORLD NEWS > VLADIMIR PUTIN'S GLOBAL WARNING.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-09-17 04:13  

#3  I say prepare for the second-worst. The worst would be if they get their hands on a nuke. You just know they'd use it to try to coax the 12th Imam out of its hole.
Posted by: gorb   2007-09-17 02:26  

#2  I suppose we must be thankful that another country is also voicing this idea. Let's if this lasts longer than the placement of Iran's next equipment order.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-09-17 01:48  

#1  Kouchner also said his nation and Germany are discussing the possibility of additional sanctions against Iran. He added that France has advised its large companies against doing business with Tehran.

It's nice to hear France saying something finally, but let's see what they say next week.
Posted by: Boss Craising2882   2007-09-17 01:12  

00:00