You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
US sees serious religious freedom problems in Pakistan
2007-09-15
The US State Department’s annual report on religious freedoms around the world notes “continued deterioration of the extremely poor status of respect for religious freedom” in Iran and highlights “serious problems” in Pakistan.

‘Report on International Religious Freedom’ published on Friday warns that religious freedom conditions have worsened in insurgency-wracked Iraq as well as Egypt, while communist China has embarked on a crackdown on foreign missionaries ahead of the Olympics. Religious freedom is “integral to our efforts to combat the ideology of hatred and religious intolerance that fuels global terrorism,” said Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice as she launched the 800-page report in Washington.

Amid intra-sectarian Muslim violence, religious worship conditions “deteriorated” over the past year in Iraq with the ongoing insurgency “significantly” harming the ability of people to practice their faith, according to the report. “Many individuals from various religious groups were targeted because of their religious identity or their secular leanings,” the report said of the situation in Iraq where US troops are facing an uphill battle to restore order.

In Egypt, a key US ally, respect for religious freedom has “declined”, the report said, citing particularly a court ruling this year that reinstated a policy not to provide a legal means for converts from Islam to Christianity to amend their civil records. “There are cases where converts have been held and sometimes received physical abuse,” US special envoy for international religious freedom John Hanford told a briefing. One convert released after 25 months has his life now “under threat,” he pointed out.

The report also highlighted religious repression in China, which reportedly expelled more than 100 foreign missionaries in the spring of 2007 in what some groups alleged was a “government-initiated” campaign to tighten control on Christian house churches ahead of the Olympics next year.

There were also “credible reports of deaths due to torture and abuse” involving practitioners of the Falun Gong spiritual sect who “continued to face arrest, detention and imprisonment.” Beijing is imposing “extremely harsh treatment” on those determined to have religious contact in China, Hanford lamented.

The report transmitted to Congress on Friday, is a precursor to the announcement each year of a blacklist of countries “of particular concern” that are subject to US sanctions for religious repression. Iran headed last year’s list alongside China, Eritrea, Myanmar, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Uzbekistan.
Posted by:Fred

#9  Diplomatic services do however attract more than their fair share of personnel who romanticize Arab and Muslim culture.

John Foster Dulles for instance had a bizarre notion that Muslims were great fighters. Even though his own brother Allen had taught English in India, he though the Gurhka people who inhabit Nepal and India were Muslim and Pakistani...

This was vividly reflected in a conversation which Walter Lippmann claimed to have had with Dulles at a Washington dinner party shortly after the 1954 Geneva Accords. “Look Walter,” Dulles said, blinking behind his thick glasses, “I’ve got some real fighting men into the south of Asia. The only Asians who can really fight are the Pakistanis. That’s why we need them in the alliance. We could never get along without the Gurkhas.” When Lippmann reminded him that the Gurkhas are Indian, not Pakistani, Dulles replied, “Well, they may not be Pakistanis, but they’re Moslems.” Lippmann once more corrected Dulles, saying, “No, I’m afraid they’re not Moslems either, they’re Hindus.” Dulles merely replied, “No matter,” and proceeded to lecture Lippmann for half an hour on how SEATO would plug the dike against communism in Asia
Posted by: john frum   2007-09-15 13:03  

#8  State Department equates the idiots who destroy Valentine's day displays with hardcore jihadis like the LeT

Well do "Hindu fundamentalists" make a practice of arranging a confortable retairment for their friends in USDS?
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-09-15 12:29  

#7  

Had the wrong graphic. Fixed.
Posted by: mcsegeek1   2007-09-15 12:00  

#6  This is partial Sharia... not the criminal part.. just the laws regarding marriage etc.

In the 80's an old Muslim woman was triple talaqed ("I divorce you"...) and thrown out of the house.
She fought back in the courts and won alimony in the Indian Supreme Court.

Well, the Muslims agitated and the Indian Parliament passed a constitutional amendment that asserted the "rights" of the Muslim personal law boards.

So an old, uneducated woman after decades of marriage was deprived of her alimony by an act of Parliament.

And the BJP is being anti-Muslim by criticizing this...

Ironically the most rabid of the "Hindu fundamentalists" is probably equivalent to a "moderate Muslim"... but the State Department equates the idiots who destroy Valentine's day displays with hardcore jihadis like the LeT
Posted by: john frum   2007-09-15 10:45  

#5  Oh-oh. Does Dee Dee Doodoo know about this?
Posted by: tu3031   2007-09-15 10:41  

#4  The State Department apparently has no problem with this, but a big problem with those who advocate one secular law for all citizens...

How is it that all these sensitive bleeding-heart handwringers nonetheless have absolutely no problem with shari'a law's incredible barbarity?
Posted by: Zenster   2007-09-15 10:31  

#3  The report criticizes the BJP party in India for advocating a uniform civil code.

Now, the UCC is actually mandated by the Indian constitution but never implemented because of Muslim opposition.

So Muslim law (Sharia) governs marriage, divorce, alimony etc.

The State Department apparently has no problem with this, but a big problem with those who advocate one secular law for all citizens...
Posted by: john frum   2007-09-15 10:21  

#2  No shit, Sherlock.
Posted by: gromgoru   2007-09-15 09:33  

#1  Religious freedom is “integral to our efforts to combat the ideology of hatred and religious intolerance that fuels global terrorism,” said Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice

Even Rice grants undue credibility to Islamic regimes by her diplomatic recognition of them.

“Many individuals from various religious groups were targeted because of their religious identity or their secular leanings,”

Whoa, now! These “religious groups were targeted” because of WHAT? Do you mean to say that Islam had no role in this?!?

In Egypt, a key US ally, respect for religious freedom has “declined”

Which part of this is supposed to make me puke? A “key US ally” or “religious freedom”?

“There are cases where converts have been held and sometimes received physical abuse,”

No!!!!! Never!

The report also highlighted religious repression in China, which reportedly expelled more than 100 foreign missionaries in the spring of 2007 in what some groups alleged was a “government-initiated” campaign to tighten control on Christian house churches ahead of the Olympics next year.

Yet none of that prevents us from buying billions of dollars worth of goods each year from the PolitburoÂ’s Mandarins. Perish the flaming thought.

Iran headed last yearÂ’s list alongside China, Eritrea, Myanmar, North Korea, Saudi Arabia, Sudan and Uzbekistan.

Yet China and Saudi Arabia—two of the world’s most repressive yet prosperous economies— remain beyond reproach. Go figure.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-09-15 00:26  

00:00