Submit your comments on this article |
China-Japan-Koreas |
Bush: U.S. to consider end of Korean War if DPRK stops nuke program |
2007-09-08 |
![]() The two leaders are in Sydney for series of APEC meetings which will culminate in the leaders meeting on Saturday and Sunday. Bush stressed that the ending of the Korean War would depend on DPRK's leader Kim Jong-il. After the talks, the two leaders gave briefings to reporters when Roh asked Bush to be more "clearer" on his position on an official end to the Korean War. Bush said "I can't make it any more clear... We look forward to the day when we can end the Korean War. That will happen when Kim Jong-il verifiably gets rid of his weapons programs and his weapons." The Koran Peninsula has been technically left in a state of war since the Korean War ended with a truce in 1953. A formal peace treaty has never been signed. |
Posted by:Fred |
#4 Legally, the US CANNOT end the state of war with the NorKors by itself -- only the UN can. What the US can do as Supreme Allied Commander (UN) is recommend that the Security Council negotiate a peace treaty with the North Koreans. That is how the truce was negotiated -- through representatives approved by the Security Council; of course, at that point, they the negotiators were all US commanders. |
Posted by: Shieldwolf 2007-09-08 18:32 |
#3 No peace until Kim stands trial for crimes against humanity. |
Posted by: Zenster 2007-09-08 13:41 |
#2 [Short pause] There, we've considered it. Now close that damned plant, you malevolent dwarf. |
Posted by: Mitch H. 2007-09-08 13:13 |
#1 Legally, this might not be a good idea. I'm not certain but being in a technical state of war might make some military considerations easier to implement. I wonder how the commander of US forces in Korea reacted to this idea. |
Posted by: Jonathan 2007-09-08 10:42 |