You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
U.S. spies get a top-secret Web of their own
2007-09-03
NEW YORK: America's spies, like America's teenagers, are secretive, talk in code and get in trouble if they're not watched closely. It's hard to imagine spies logging on and exchanging "whuddups" with strangers, though. They are just not wired that way. If networking is lifeblood to the teenager, it is viewed with deep suspicion by the spy.

The intelligence agencies have something like networking in mind, though, as they scramble to adopt Web technologies that young people have mastered in the millions. The idea is to try to solve the information-sharing problems inherent in the spy world - and blamed, most spectacularly, for the failure to prevent the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

In December, officials say, the agencies will introduce A-Space, a top-secret variant of the social networking Web sites MySpace and Facebook. The "A" stands for "analyst," and where Facebook users swap snapshots, homework tips and gossip, intelligence analysts will be able to compare notes on satellite photos of North Korean nuclear sites, Iraqi insurgents and Chinese missiles. A-Space will join Intellipedia, the spooks' Wikipedia, where intelligence officers from all 16 U.S. spy agencies pool their knowledge. Sixteen months after its creation, officials say, the top-secret version of Intellipedia has 29,255 articles, with an average of 114 new articles and more than 4,800 edits to articles added each workday.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  My information is dated, but neither the CIA nor any of the military agencies had a truly working information-sharing program in the 1980's that actually portrayed fused intelligence data. Everything was compartmented, and you had to have six or seven different clearances to see even a small amount of data. The fit's going to really hit the shan in about five years when we have 50-60 drones, a dozen satellites, and 200 ground stations all pumping out data every day. The way it was done 30 years ago isn't viable today, and the way things are done today won't be what's needed five years from now. Something's got to change, and if it takes getting rid of some of the deadwood at CIA, DIA, NGIS, NSA, or the military departments, so be it. Another 9/11 is intolerable.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2007-09-03 22:50  

#3  The older intelligence guys would rather have a dozen 9/11 failures than give up one inch to the real enemy: competing intelligence agencies. And they don't understand computers, either. I read a piece about the internal systems that the CIA guys use when searching for information, and it's pathetic. They can't even use AND or OR when specifying search terms.
Posted by: gromky   2007-09-03 02:16  

#2  Aware that such a system could be vulnerable to a mole, officials say computers will flag users who download masses of data or repeatedly seek information outside their work area

Too late.
Posted by: gorb   2007-09-03 01:57  

#1  Internet 3?
Posted by: 3dc   2007-09-03 00:59  

00:00