You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Israeli agent testifies in Holy Land Foundation case
2007-08-11
Prosecutors and lawyers for a Muslim charity accused of funding terrorists clashed Thursday over whether jurors should see documents that Israeli soldiers seized during raids of Palestinian organizations. An Israeli agent testified about the documents during the trial of five leaders of the Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development. The agent was not identified, and before he testified the courtroom was cleared of spectators except the families of the defendants. Spectators were allowed in another room to listen to the proceedings.

Prosecutors believe the documents seized by Israeli soldiers will show that the Holy Land leaders knew they were sending millions of dollars to groups controlled by Hamas, which is illegal because the US government calls Hamas a terrorist organization. Defense attorneys tried to cast doubt on the authenticity and significance of the documents, which included pamphlets, brochures and posters that are presumably pro-Hamas. Jurors didn't see the documents because the judge had not ruled by late Thursday on whether to allow them into the case.

Linda Moreno, one of the defense lawyers, asked the Israeli agent whether his soldiers had warrants when they raided Palestinian charities called zakat committees, orphanages and the Palestinian Authority.
In filings before the trial, prosecutors said documents seized from the security offices of the Palestinian Authority contained information on Hamas's funding, including from Holy Land. Defense lawyers suggested that the evidence did not meet the standards for trial in a US court. Linda Moreno, one of the defense lawyers, asked the Israeli agent whether his soldiers had warrants when they raided Palestinian charities called zakat committees, orphanages and the Palestinian Authority. Prosecutors objected, and Federal District Judge A. Joe Fish upheld their protest. "You're not contending that the Fourth Amendment applies outside the United States, are you?" Fish asked Moreno, referring the US Constitution's protection against unreasonable search and seizure. The judge said he did not see the relevance of whether the soldiers had warrants.

The charity officials are charged with aiding a terrorist group, conspiracy, money laundering and tax counts. Prosecutors say Holy Land sent more than $12 million to groups controlled by Hamas under the guise of humanitarian aid from 1995 until the charity was shut down in December 2001.

It is an important case in the Bush administration's anti-terrorism prosecutions, and President George W. Bush personally announced the freezing of Holy Land's assets. The trial's first three weeks have been dominated by the testimony of an FBI agent who described financial records, videos and wiretapped phone conversations that show links between the Holy Land defendants and Hamas officials. Defense lawyers say prosecutors are dragging out events from the late 1980s and early '90s, when it was still legal to have contact with Hamas. Testimony was scheduled to resume Monday.
Posted by:Fred

#4  She also has no clue on how to fight terrorists.

Clues often come to those who consider that a useful pursuit. Might be the case that she doesn't, not in her heart of hearts.
Posted by: lotp   2007-08-11 18:06  

#3  Gary - my MOTHER had one like that. I used to get the special treat of feeding the clothes through the wringer. You have to be careful, or you'll end up with your ARM in that thing. Not a safe machine at all.

The defense lawyer in this case is definitely an idiot, trying to force the rest of the world to live by our Constitution. It would be nice if more countries had the same guaranteed rights we have, but it's stupid to try to impose our standards on the rest of the world.

She also has no clue on how to fight terrorists. Such an idiot with a license to practice law doesn't bode well for our society.
Posted by: Old Patriot   2007-08-11 17:08  

#2  The judge said he did not see the relevance of whether the soldiers had warrants.

Who the fark needs "warrants" when they're fighting a war in some other country? This is just another attempt by Muslims to use America's superb Constitutional law against itself. Good on the judge for spotting such a blatant ruse.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-08-11 16:34  

#1  My grandmother used to have a washing machine like that. I can just barely remember her using it in the mid-60s.
Posted by: Gary and the Samoyeds   2007-08-11 11:47  

00:00