Submit your comments on this article | |
Afghanistan | |
Iran gives Taliban hi-tech weapons to fight British | |
2007-08-06 | |
![]() The news that Taliban rebels are being armed with Iranian-supplied weapons poses an added threat to the 5,000 British troops battling insurgents in southern Afghanistan. “I have to tell the truth. It is clear to everyone that Iran is supporting the enemy of Afghanistan, the Taliban,” Colonel Rahmatullah Safi, head of border police for western Afghanistan, told The Sunday Times.
The deadliest weapons known to cross the border are Iranian-made armour-piercing explosives. Colonel Thomas Kelly, an American under the command of Nato, said that the explosives that have been used to deadly effect in Iraq have been found recently in western Afghanistan. “These are very sophisticated IEDs [improvised explosive devices] and they’re really not manufactured in any other place to our knowledge than Iran,” he said, adding that the explosives were factory made. He stopped short of saying they were supplied by the Iranian government. Along with supplies of Kalashnikov assault rifles and mortars, Afghan military sources fear that the Iranians may also have supplied heat-seeking missiles. International forces rely heavily on helicopters to transport troops as the roads are too dangerous to drive along, but they are especially vulnerable to this kind of weaponry. What is of particular concern to British and US troops is that the Taliban could get their hands on the modern Manpad (man-portable air defence system), a highly mobile shoulder-launched surface-to-air missile. | |
Posted by:Steve White |
#6 work accidents involving owner(s) and managers at an Iranian IED manufacturing plant would be ideal.. like bad breaks explosive sewer gas too much flour dust in the kitchen to high an arsenic level in the drinking water and just the stuff that frustrates a person like... sand or dust in the motor oil assembly lines with failures that cause IEDs to drop off or get hit with a huge static charge and the number one diss. Owners and managers discovered owning Dogs as pets. |
Posted by: 3dc 2007-08-06 12:33 |
#5 Afghan intelligence sources believe that many deals between the Taliban and the Iranians are conducted through a drug smuggler in southern Afghanistan who acts as a middle man. He is from the minority Baluch tribe; as well as smuggling heroin through Iran to Europe, he is also believed to have bought weapons off the Iranian government and sold them on to the Taliban. Target him. You get a twofer; drug and weapons traffic are slowed for awhile. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2007-08-06 09:45 |
#4 Maybe we should give them more hostages? |
Posted by: The Royal Navy 2007-08-06 08:59 |
#3 OK, we've been talking about this for almost a year. Everyone knows they are doing it. Next step? Besides bend over and grab our ankles? |
Posted by: bigjim-ky 2007-08-06 08:04 |
#2 We need to <hint>refine</hint> the target list for sabotage. |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2007-08-06 07:28 |
#1 It strikes me that the Iranians-in-charge are feeling extremely vulnerable to internal unrest. As such, they are doing all the can to get the West to attack them. Not a crushing, all-out war on them, since they (rightly) perceive Western politics won't permit it, but a Clinton-style attack that will allow them to call Iranians to unite to resist the Great Satan. The Iranians can't be 'seen' as starting a war, but smuggled arms is just routine business, not an act of war to them. An overt attack will just play into the Mullah's hands; a covert attack that is obvious, or gets caught, does the same. We need a plan with plausible deniability that can take out key players - heart attacks, cancer, AIDS, 'work accidents' etc. Not Halliburton earthquakes or tsunamis, but maybe a 'guided meteor'? |
Posted by: Glenmore 2007-08-06 07:08 |