You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
Russian naval chief calls for Med presence
2007-08-04
Admiral Vladimir Masorin, the commander of the Russian navy, on Friday called for Russia to establish a permanent naval presence in the Mediterranean to protect its strategic interests in the area. Speaking at the Ukrainian port of Sevastopol, where Russia houses its Black Sea fleet, Admiral Masorin said: "The Mediterranean is an important theatre of operations . . . We must restore a permanent presence in the region", according to RIA-Novosti, the Russian news agency.

But Pavel Felgenhauer, a Moscow-based military expert, said Admiral Masorin's remarks were "wishful thinking" and reflected Russia's desire to restore Soviet military might. "What on earth would we need this for now? It would be expensive and would stretch the resources of our run-down navy to the limit. Our surface fleet looks pretty large on paper. But it is questionable how many vessels can actually sail," he said.
Questionable? Not really ...
Mr Felgenhauer said the navy, the most expensive branch of the military, was constantly competing with the army and air force for extra funds.

Mr Putin appointed Admiral Masorin in 2005, with instructions to revive the navy, badly neglected since the collapse of the Soviet Union. Last month Admiral Masorin announced plans to build a new base for nuclear submarines on the Kamchatka Peninsula in the Russian far east. But Mr Felgenhauer said Russia, which this week announced a three-year delay in construction of a $1.5bn (€1.1bn, £740m) aircraft carrier for India, did not have the capacity to build ships or naval facilities rapidly.

During the cold war Russia maintained a permanent naval presence in the Mediterranean serviced out of the Syrian port of Tartus to shadow the US Sixth Fleet. Tartus still provides technical services to the Russian fleet, but no vessels are stationed there permanently.

The Russian navy already participates in the Nato Active Endeavour anti-terrorism operations in the Mediterranean.

Admiral Masorin said a naval presence was crucial for the protection of growing volumes of Russian oil and gas supplies delivered to ports in the region by new export pipelines.
None of the pipelines run through the Med.
Posted by:Steve White

#6  Are the wankers going to plant a flag on the bottom of the Med?
Posted by: JohnQC   2007-08-04 17:08  

#5  There are places in the bays that the Russians store their old nuke subs {which they use as local power plants for the bases, while they rot in place}that have mud so contaminated with toxic chemicals, metals, and radiation that any testing equipment used on samples from said locations is destroyed after use. Plus the testers themselves use full NBC protective gear when running the tests. The leached out uranium levels in some of those ghost fleet bays is 3-4 times higher than the Superfund sites at Oak Ridge.
Posted by: Shieldwolf   2007-08-04 16:38  

#4  Jeebus, Steve, I knew the Russians could barely afford to keep the bilge pumps running but that photo is a real mind-blower. There's three or four semi-submerged vessels, not to mention how all of the ships are in contact with each other. That's got to be causing some major damage by itself. Even though it's a satellite photo, you can actually see the rust on some boats. That site is going to be heavily polluted for centuries. Once again, communism leaves its usual mark stain on the environment.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-08-04 16:32  

#3  good potential to serve as a teaching tool for future underwater archeologists

excellent snark!
Posted by: Frank G   2007-08-04 11:18  

#2  Joe, I think that you have it reverse. The failure was not US', but Russian. Also, it is not in any form "fatal" to US, although it is not desirable state of affairs and may or may not have some serious consequences. But you are projecting too much of a clout on Russians... in my view they roar a bit over their capabilities and their fleet has a good potential to serve as a teaching tool for future underwater archeologists.
Posted by: twobyfour   2007-08-04 05:57  

#1  Russ also desires to keep 12-15 modern diesel subs there in the region as well. *RIAN > USA's failure to prolong START-1 is "A FATAL MISTAKE", wid dire consequences for US-Russ relations + entire world.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-08-04 00:47  

00:00