| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: WoT |
| The Dems Get Surprised on Iraq |
| 2007-08-02 |
| By Jack Kelly Rep. Nancy Boyda (D-KS) walked out of a hearing of the House Armed Services Committee because she couldn't stand to listen to what retired General Jack Keane, former vice chief of staff of the Army, was saying. "There is only so much you can take until we in fact had to leave the room for a while...after so much frustration of having to listen to what we listened to," Ms. Boyda explained to reporters later. What did Gen. Keane say to so upset Ms. Boyda? He'd visited contested neighborhoods in Baghdad in February, and again three months later: "What you see is a stark contrast. All the schools are open. The markets are teeming with people...There is an attempt to provide essential services to the population where in '06 there were none." "Those kinds of comments will in fact show up in the media and further divide this country instead of saying, here's the reality of the problem," Rep. Boyda said. "And people, we have to come together and deal with the reality of this issue." It is difficult to say which is the more remarkable: that Ms. Boyda, whose military experience is zero, imagines she knows "the reality of this issue" better than does Gen. Keane; or that she is appalled by good news from Iraq. Like the Copperheads of 1864, Democrats today think defeatism is their ticket to political victory. Like the Copperheads after Sherman captured Atlanta, they may be in for grave disappointment. |
| Posted by:JohnQC |
| #3 See also CAL THOMAS' commentary > DEMOCRATS ARE/HAVE INVESTED IN DEEFATISM. Amerika is still AMerica, the USSA is still the USA in 2007 - iff Lefties + Globalists want OWG + SWO, just say so. |
| Posted by: JosephMendiola 2007-08-02 22:58 |
| #2 Like the Copperheads of 1864, Democrats today think defeatism is their ticket to political victory. Given the present value of copper, perhaps we should call today's "Peace Democrats" leadheads. |
| Posted by: GK 2007-08-02 22:20 |
| #1 If she cannot stand to remain in the meeting, doing here job, then doesn't that violate her oath of office and prove she is incapable of fulfilling the duties of a congressperson? Of course, the D after her name is proof enough that she lacks honesty, humanity and a brain. |
| Posted by: Silentbrick 2007-08-02 21:21 |