You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
U.S. Widens Push to Use Armed Iraqi Residents
2007-07-28
The U.S. military in Iraq is expanding its efforts to recruit and fund armed Sunni residents as local protection forces in order to improve security and promote reconciliation at the neighborhood level, according to senior U.S. commanders.

Within the past month, the U.S. military command in charge of day-to-day operations in Iraq ordered subordinate units to step up creation of the local forces, authorizing commanders to pay the fighters with U.S. emergency funds, reward payments and other monies.

The initiative, which extends to all Iraqis, represents at least a temporary departure from the established U.S. policy of building formally trained security forces under the control of the Iraqi government. It also provokes fears within the Shiite-led government that the new Sunni groups will use their arms against it, commanders said.

The goal is to put the new, irregular forces in place quickly -- hiring them on contracts and providing them with uniforms without waiting for access to lengthy police and army training programs.

In the long term, commanders say, the goal is to incorporate the units into the Iraqi security forces. The initiative arises out of efforts underway by some U.S. military units to enlist forces from local tribes as well as insurgent groups in different neighborhoods, most of which have been predominantly Sunni.

The top U.S. commander in Iraq, Gen. David H. Petraeus, called the development of the grass-roots forces the most significant trend in Iraq "of the last four months or so" and one that could help propel slow-moving efforts at national reconciliation among Iraq's main religious sects and ethnic groups.

"This is a very, very important component of reconciliation because it's happening from the bottom up," he said in an interview Friday. "The bottom-up piece is much farther along than any of us would have anticipated a few months back. It's become the focus of a great deal of effort, as there is a sense that this can bear a lot of fruit."

U.S. commanders acknowledge that there is a risk that the Iraqi government will refuse to hire some or all of the local force members and will instead use the names of the Sunni recruits as target lists.

"What the government is afraid of, and we understand that, is they don't want another armed militia of some sort. So what we're looking for is sort of an interim measure . . . to take advantage of these groups," said Brig. Gen. James Campbell, deputy U.S. commander for Baghdad, where he said 18,000 more police officers and 30 police stations are needed.

And while local residents are often the best choice for securing their own streets, the risk exists that they will overstep their bounds in Baghdad's densely populated, mixed sectarian districts, Petraeus said. "You have to make sure that the neighborhood watch doesn't end up watching someone else's neighborhood."

Over a luncheon of chicken and rice in Baghdad's Rasheed district this week, Col. Ricky D. Gibbs, the U.S. commander in the area, met with half a dozen influential Sunni leaders to discuss forming neighborhood protection groups, as well as to share intelligence.

A local Sunni leader, a bespectacled man in a red striped shirt, leaned across the table and handed Gibbs a list of 250 names of Sunni residents willing to serve in a local force.

MORE
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#6  Thanks for kicking us up a notch in GoogleKook.
Posted by: HalfEmpty   2007-07-28 18:39  

#5  I have long been puzzled at the seeming absence of pistols in Iraq. AK-47s are combat weapons, much better for offense than defense. But pistols are small, easy to conceal, easy to use in restricted areas, and very effective as defensive weapons.

It would be much harder for terrorists to intimidate a population armed with pistols, by dint of their not knowing who was armed and willing to resist. How can you control a group of people when one or two might be able to gun you down if you are not paying attention to them?

Over and over again I read of bus loads of Iraqis hijacked and murdered. With a profusion of pistols, a lot of those massacres wouldn't have happened, or would have had a lot lower death rate.

And as the number of pistols go up, their value as an offensive weapon goes *down*. A man runs into a crowded bank waving his pistol around and yelling orders, two or three armed people could lay him out quickly.

A lot of pistols mean decisions are made by group consensus, not by loners.

So a change of one policy, in trouble areas: each family can have one or two pistols instead of an AK-47. Thereafter anybody walking around with an AK-47 is a dead man.

We should have imported millions of smaller caliber pistols at the very beginning.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2007-07-28 14:26  

#4  Considering all the conniptions our masters have about letting Americans have minimal arms...
Posted by: Gary and the Samoyeds   2007-07-28 12:49  

#3  You think it would have been simple to have recruited Sunni troops to guard the eastern border an Shi'a troops to guard the western one...
Posted by: Abdominal Snowman   2007-07-28 12:48  

#2  I think starting neighborhood militias would have fixed most of the problems we had back in 2003. When I told people this they said it would start a civil war, it would be tribe against tribe...

Well, just because we didn't make neighborhood-based militias to hold things together didn't stop Al Qaeda, and Moqtada al-Sadr, from making the same sorts of institutions but with the goal of tearing Iraq apart.
Posted by: Abdominal Snowman   2007-07-28 12:46  

#1  I;ve been arguing for this for years. Its a tribal society, Use the tribes!

Problem is, that wasn't the "Big Army" way, and it took a hell of a lot more troops than were committed, and it involved going after the Shia (which some in State and CIA prevented).

The other component is closing the borders HARD - something they still have not done.
Posted by: OldSpook   2007-07-28 12:08  

00:00