Submit your comments on this article | |
Home Front: Culture Wars | |
Truthers eating their own | |
2007-07-17 | |
This time, they've gone too far. A group of 9/11 conspiracy theorists - whackos who deny that jumbo jets brought down the World Trade Center - is on the attack. But their latest target isn't the government, which they claim destroyed the buildings with explosives. They're using a vicious Internet assault to pick on an elderly widow. "They're dirty sons of bastards! They are not real men," feisty Ellen Mariani, 69, told me. Ellen lost her husband aboard United 175 on Sept. 11, 2001. "They have no respect for women, no respect for the dead and no respect for little children who now have been orphaned." Ellen is the subject of a blistering battering on the Web site of an outfit that calls itself "9/11 Researchers." While conspiracy theories are nothing new - Rosie O'Donnell gave voice on "The View" to the belief the government was involved - these bozos blast fellow conspiracy groups for not going far enough.
| |
Posted by:Seafarious |
#7 It is my experience that many of these folks have grown more irrational as they continue to ingest their of fermenting Y2K Spam stockpile. |
Posted by: Super Hose 2007-07-17 23:13 |
#6 I laugh at these articles. I can only note that when I encounter a "truther" they rarely can verbalize their "theories" mostly they refer me to movies and episodes of the X-files. I also note that I back tracked their websites, and I can not find any link to offer a comment. I can only conclude that most of these folks are seriously delusional. The serious question that all my opponents can not answer is "What would the Neo-Cons gain from their Conspiracy?" Martial Law over the country? What real "Robber Baron" would wish to see all commerce within our country come to a grinding halt? Any greedy politico would want any conspiracy to line their pockets! The mistake of the "moonbats" is to try to tie naked greed with religious fantacism, the 2 do not coincide. |
Posted by: Raider Ray 2007-07-17 22:17 |
#5 Perhaps if one tried Pepsi, instead... /ducks, runs. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2007-07-17 20:26 |
#4 Yeah, tu - how did we make steel before jet fuel? Burning coke, if I remember correctly. Can coke melt steel? Not without a draft. |
Posted by: Bobby 2007-07-17 18:19 |
#3 From the folks that believe that steel can't melt... |
Posted by: tu3031 2007-07-17 09:38 |
#2 Not sure about your hypothesis, except the Blame it on W part is a given. |
Posted by: doc 2007-07-17 08:52 |
#1 I don't think she's a truther herself, it seems more like she thinks the gvt is covering some unpleasant facts; seems reasonable to me, one RB commenter of days past (not a regular) had an interesting theory which purported that 9/11 had support from iraq, iran, bosnia, "rogue elements" of soody arabia and pakiland, and that it was in fact not the "lone gunman" terror act done by renegade AQ, but a concerted, organized effort by a transnational, islamic para-governmental web. IE a true act of unconventional *warfare*, not a terror strike. And you could probably imagine the russians/chicoms are not too far behind that islamic terror web, or even be paranoid and think it's a proxy. This seems interesting to me, though of course, there's no way to know if this is a valid theory. And anyway, I'm pretty sure there had been LOTS of CYA by the cia, the fbi, the clintonistas (cf . the Oklahoma bombing & the 1993 WTC bombing iraq possible connections),... to hide huge failures, and possibly blame it on GWB, so, unless you're in the loop, the whole truth about 9/11 is yet for future historians to write. |
Posted by: anonymous5089 2007-07-17 04:49 |