| Submit your comments on this article |
| Arabia |
| Saudis prepare to behead teenage maid |
| 2007-07-16 |
| I've taken issue with Tim Butcher's reporting before. Check the money quote from the aggrieved rep for the Saudi "National Society for Human Rights" The imminent execution of a teenage maid in Saudi Arabia drew fierce criticism yesterday and provoked condemnation of the kingdom's prolific use of capital punishment. The case has brought fresh attention to the draconian Saudi criminal justice system which is expected this year to set a new record in its use of the death sentence. Human rights campaigners yesterday urged the authorities not to behead a 19-year-old Sri Lankan maid found guilty of killing a baby in her care. According to the Saudi authorities, Rizana Nafeek admitted strangling the four-month-old boy while feeding him with a bottle. But Nafeek, whose job was not meant to include child care, has denied making any such admission. She claims the child had begun to choke before losing consciousness in spite of her desperate efforts to clear his airway. Tonight is the deadline for appeals in the case. Unless the Saudi authorities change the sentence or the parents of the victim offer clemency, Nafeek will have her head cut off by an executioner wielding a sword in front of a crowd of onlookers. Nafeek, who had been denied a lawyer at her trial, is one of 5.6 million foreign workers who live in Saudi Arabia. The vast majority are domestic workers such as Nafeek, employed to look after the homes of oil-rich families. According to the Sri Lankan government, Nafeek had only been in the country a few weeks when the incident happened in May 2005. A government delegation tried to fly to Saudi Arabia to organise her appeal but it was delayed because of visa problems. In 2005 there were 191 executions but that record could be surpassed this year as 102 have already taken place just over half way through the year. Last year the total dipped to 38 but this year's figure already includes three women, according to Amnesty International. Beheading has always been the punishment for murderers, rapists, drug traffickers and armed robbers in Saudi Arabia, which follows a strict interpretation of Islamic law. In February, four Sri Lankan workers were executed for armed robbery and their headless bodies left on public display in Riyadh, triggering harsh criticism from international rights groups. Amnesty International says some defendants are convicted solely on the basis of confessions obtained under duress, torture or deception. Kate Allen, the director of Amnesty International UK, said: "It is an absolute scandal that Saudi Arabia is preparing to behead a teenage girl who didn't even have a lawyer at her trial. The Saudi authorities are flouting an international prohibition on the execution of child offenders by even imposing a death sentence on a defendant who was reportedly 17 at the time of the alleged crime." There are so many foreign workers in Saudi Arabia that they account for a large proportion of crimes committed. "The workers commit big crimes against Saudis," said Suhaila Hammad of Saudi Arabia's National Society for Human Rights. She said the number of executions had risen because crime had increased. She said that prisoners were treated humanely and that beheadings deterred crime. "Allah, our creator, knows best what's good for his people," she said. "Should we just think of and preserve the rights of the murderer and not think of the rights of others?" |
| Posted by:Seafarious |
| #6 TW's correct- when you procreate too close on the family tree - as Saudis are wont to do - genetic abnormalities and Jihadi fervor ensue. Hillarity is delayed |
| Posted by: Frank G 2007-07-16 20:48 |
| #5 *If* the baby was strangled, and *if* the maid did it. Given the odds of genetic defects expressing either mentally or physically amongst Saudi Arabians, it could easily have been that a family member did it, or that the baby did indeed choke to death. Without a proper post mortem exam, and a fair trial, what odds we'll ever know? |
| Posted by: trailing wife 2007-07-16 19:46 |
| #4 This is about how Yurpeons are squeamish over capital punishment not an unjust judicial system for immigrants. I don’t subscribe to the “Allah knows best” BS but she strangled a baby ferchrissakes. I say lop off her head then chop it into pieces. Hmmmm…too Draconian ya think? |
| Posted by: DepotGuy 2007-07-16 17:05 |
| #3 The constant abuse of the imported workforce...treating them as low level slaves, sntching passports, murdering, beheading. Why would anyone willing go there ? Their money is enticing when you are destitute, but it's hard to spend it from the grave. |
| Posted by: Woozle Elmeter2970 2007-07-16 12:57 |
| #2 We are letting these spoiled a**holes who refuse to do anything for themselves threaten our entire way of life. I don't know what the answer is, but I sure hope to live to see the day where we smile and tell them "the party's over..." |
| Posted by: M. Murcek 2007-07-16 12:02 |
| #1 Since wimmin are subhuman creatures in Islam, no human rights org need apply. |
| Posted by: Gary (no Samoyeds in hotel) 2007-07-16 01:02 |