You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq
US House wants Iraq pullout by next April Fools' Day
2007-07-14
Defying a White House veto threat, the US House of Representatives on Thursday approved legislation to pull troops out of Iraq by April 1, 2008. By a vote of 223-201, the Democratic-controlled House approved the legislation in the hopes that it would pressure the Senate to attach a similar mandatory troop withdrawal timetable to a military policy bill it is debating.

The bill would tell the Pentagon to begin withdrawing combat troops within four months and complete the redeployment by April 1. Under the bill, an unspecified number of US soldiers would stay in Iraq to train Iraqi soldiers, conduct counter-terrorism operations and protect US diplomats. The Pentagon will also reduce its naval presence in the Gulf to one aircraft carrier group by August, defense officials said on Thursday. “This change in carrier presence does not reflect a change in commitment or concern for the region,” Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said. Defence officials said there could be a five-day window before the year’s end when no US carriers would be in the Gulf. Whitman however did not comment on specific deployment timetables.
Posted by:Fred

#17  if that composite doesn't make you proud as hell you aren't worthy.
Posted by: RD   2007-07-14 23:27  

#16  

Chimpy McBushitler O'Halliburton, Don't You Understand, The Iraqi People Don't Want Us!


Posted by: House demoC*raps   2007-07-14 23:22  

#15  Nothing but bluster and appeasing the left's moonbat fringe.

Anyone who knows a respectable amount regarding our troops and equipment in Iraq will also know that it is impossible to withdraw within that timeline.

Posted by: Army Life   2007-07-14 16:57  

#14  Time to bring back the "Throw the Bums Out" movement of the early 90's - remember? Term limits? Contract with America? It worked then and can still work now. We just need a Gingrich type intellect with a Reganistic personality. Fred? (Thompson that is). Hell even Pruitt could be the Fred we need.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2007-07-14 16:47  

#13  Of course you're right, Alan. *sigh* Clearly I must stop trying to think before my morning nap.

Sadly, if we don't elect anyone, the current crop will insist on staying.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-07-14 16:17  

#12  I play Doom and Quake, yes there is a way to kill Vampires, blow them to small pieces with a grenade or rocket, they then will not regenerate.
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2007-07-14 10:30  

#11  pure posturing - they can't override a veto with those numbers
Posted by: Frank G   2007-07-14 10:28  

#10  Congressional incumbents are like vampires, you just can't get rid of them.
Posted by: Anguper Hupomosing9418   2007-07-14 09:34  

#9  TW ALL of the reps. are up for election in 2008 and a third of the Senate.

Do you think we could get by if we don't elect anyone for a few cycles?
Posted by: AlanC   2007-07-14 09:10  

#8  and a pony.

I'm waiting for the polling people to ask "Not that you'd want it to happen, but do you think the military could do a better job of running the government than the morons in Congress?".
Posted by: Procopius2k   2007-07-14 09:07  

#7  Is it anything more than posturing? Unless the Senate passes matching legislation this can't become law.

One third of the Representatives are up for election in 2008, so let's take a look at throwing out some of the idiots. That should solve the problem.
Posted by: trailing wife   2007-07-14 08:41  

#6  That margin can turn. End Shiite encroachment and Sunni terror will lose its decreasing support base. That is already happening. And the al-Sadrites took an ass-kicking this week when then mortared the Green Zone.

Al-Jazeera has already reported the "Tet Offensive" analogies that surfaced in the dhimmi press. The terrorists might attempt to capitalize on that comfort to the enemy.
Posted by: McZoid   2007-07-14 03:35  

#5  And I want this building unable to house by then due to a sewage back up. I have no respect for this house now.

F U ALL.
Posted by: newc   2007-07-14 03:10  

#4  "Tis why many dedicated anti-US Islamists, Terrorists, etc. are now realizing that, to save Radical Islamism and its agenda from defeat, America itself must be attacked, destabilized and warred against from within. GOOD NEWS FOR ISLAMISTS > RUSSIA > RUSSIAN TERRITORY TO ENLARGE [by 0.46 Milyuhn square miles] DUE TO DISCOVERY OF HYDROCARBON IN ARCTIC. Also, CHINA > TOLD RUSSIA IT IS OFFICIO AGAINST US GMD/BMD/ABM RADARS AND MISSLES BEING SET UP IN ALASKA.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-07-14 02:00  

#3  TRUTHOUT/OTHERS > basically, no one in the USA should expect a withdrawal or pullout either wid this POTUS [Dubya], or any GOP-DEM successor to Dubya. All the hoopla is only about MINOR OR LIMITED SCALEBACK /REDUX OF MILFORS in relation to level = scale of insurgent actions, or inthe altern MEANINGLESS "TALKING POINTS/PR" FOR 2008 ELEX. Very few GOP-DEM pols in the USG support a major and or total withdrawal of US milfors from either Iraq or the ME region, at least for the duration of the WOT + insurgency within Iraq proper. Can label it MURTHA-ISM, or "Talking the Talk but NOT Walking the Walk", etc.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2007-07-14 01:53  

#2  No Zen, i think irony is too cerebral for them.
Posted by: Abu do you love   2007-07-14 01:33  

#1  US House wants Iraq pullout by next April Fools' Day

I suppose all sense of irony is lost upon these traitorous bastards.
Posted by: Zenster   2007-07-14 01:04  

00:00