You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Prince Charles hails links between Islam and Christianity
2007-07-13
Muslims and Christians have far more in common than they have differences, Britain's Prince Charles said at the opening of an exhibition of Islamic art in London Thursday. 'So much attention is paid to the outward differences between faiths. Almost reflexively, this becomes translated into seemingly impenetrable divisions between people,' said Prince Charles, who has made the promotion of inter-faith understanding one of his main interests. 'People who - if they did but know it - are in fact linked by much and separated by little,' he said.

The masterpieces on display at the Spirit and Life exhibition at London's Ismaili Centre bore witness to 'the close ties between the Abrahamic faiths,' he added. They were a reminder of the 'spirituality from which our faiths draw their real strength and of the heritage and traditions which we share.'

The exhibition, organized by the Aga Khan Trust for Culture, features rare Islamic art and manuscripts never before seen in the Britain. It includes miniatures from Persian epic Shahnama (The Book of Kings) and an extremely rare copy of the Canon of Medicine of Ibn Sina which was used both in Europe and the Middle East as the standard medical textbook for more than 500 years.

The display, which mixes religious artefacts with secular exhibits, also features musical instruments, sculpture, pottery and paintings. The show presents treasures from the permanent collection of the Aga Khan Museum, which will open in Toronto, Canada in 2010. The Aga Khan said he hoped the exhibition would show the arts could transcend barriers between cultures.
Posted by:Fred

#23  Prince Charles does some of his original Islamic interpretive dances while wearing a Du-rag from his 7th Century Christendom collection.


1) Burqa Hijab Heat
&
2) Sweaty Trips Around The Rock
&
3) WuDu Assplay with Acolytes Before Prayer
&
4) Man Jammies

Tickets for sale at the door.
Posted by: RD   2007-07-13 23:22  

#22  Inbred dimwit.
Posted by: jds   2007-07-13 19:58  

#21  Fly away, Dumbo.

Hot contender for Snark O' the Week™.

Diplomacy rarely has to do with right or wrong or moral compass.

Which explains many of the EU's problems and even some of America's current ones. The subsumption of Diplospeak by Newspeak Politically Correct Speech has spelled disaster for productive negotiations. Not that there is anything to negotiate about with Islam but there still are a few countries left that it works with.

Posted by: Zenster   2007-07-13 13:42  

#20  The only links between Christians and Islamists would be the chain link fence at Quantonimo for the Islamist Jihadists. (spit!)
Posted by: Helmuth, Speaking for Chusoling1715   2007-07-13 13:35  

#19  The Prince needs to stay in the can.
Posted by: DarthVader   2007-07-13 11:39  

#18  I think the European countries with their sizeable muslim populations are like gluttons who have eaten something that isn't digesting properly and they are now trying to decide whether or not they need to puke. Puking is unpleasant so the Prince is kind of like taking some deep breaths with a glass of water in the hope that it will settle but there is still quite a lot of queasiness.
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2007-07-13 11:27  

#17  I don't buy the Charles converted bit. He is born and raised to be diplomatic. Diplomacy rarely has to do with right or wrong or moral compass. That is why the left love Diplomacy so much.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2007-07-13 11:07  

#16  Fly away, Dumbo.
Posted by: mojo   2007-07-13 10:45  

#15  Ah yes, the olde "Abrahamic faith" argument. Too bad it was Abraham who created all this "division" between Judeo-Christian religions and Islam in the first place. Yes, we may be "technically" separated by a few "issues", but those issues are HUGE and I, for one, choose not to live in an Islamic Theocracy, thank you very much, Chuckie!
Posted by: BA   2007-07-13 10:36  

#14  The monarch, post H-8, is also head of the Anglican church so if the monarch is a muslim (or a catholic or a jew for that matter), it creates some confusion.

Of course I recollect that at least one post H-8 Queen was catholic so there is probably a work around - at least for that.
Posted by: mhw   2007-07-13 10:24  

#13  What kind of art? I thought any depiction of any living thing was forbidden which pretty much limits them to geometric patterns. Boring.
Posted by: treo   2007-07-13 10:22  

#12  I don't think that it is out of the question that the Monarchy will one day in fact become Islamic. The facts on the ground -- rates of birth, immigration, and emigration -- are powerful. One can only hope that the future Islamic state of Britain will become a force for enlightenment.
Posted by: Perfesser   2007-07-13 10:17  

#11  I wonder if the Queen has him patted down when he comes to visit yet?
Posted by: tu3031   2007-07-13 10:07  

#10  King William, please.
Posted by: Excalibur   2007-07-13 10:06  

#9  Does the 12th Imam know the 7th Imam is lost ?
Shit, maybe they'll come back holding hands or something.
Posted by: wxjames   2007-07-13 09:48  

#8  This Aga Khan is the leader of a splinter group that broke from the normative Ismaili movement (itself a splinter group - although a larger splinter). The Ismailis (who are one of the more peaceful segments of Islam and are despised by normative Sunnis) wait for the return of the 7th (and last)Iman (or a divine annunciation of his successor) whereas the mainstream Shiite movement waits for the return of the 12th Iman.
Posted by: mhw   2007-07-13 08:52  

#7  Ah, not the same revolutions, exactly.

Americans didn't want to kill off the monarch, they just wanted to go away and do their own thing. The monarchy didn't want us to go, so we fought just long enough that we became too much trouble to keep.

The French wanted to supplant the existing government and kill, kill, kill. Not very nice, even if their monarch wasn't a great guy.
Posted by: no mo uro   2007-07-13 07:30  

#6  1776 - justified, yet again.

Nor forget the French Revolution and their appropriate use of the guillotine.

(I guess its obvious I'm not a Monarchist)
Posted by: BrerRabbit   2007-07-13 06:58  

#5  1776 - justified, yet again.
Posted by: no mo uro   2007-07-13 06:09  

#4  Charles is a cretin. Most people here have a very low opinion of him, he's just been such a fuckwit over the years; talking to vegetables, the 'tampon' affair (Camillagate), offering his 'opinion' on irrelevant subjects and now this love affair with Islam. And of course, he cheated on Diana - and that's not going to be forgotten.

I would put money on The Queen skipping a generation and offering the crown to William.
Posted by: Tony (UK)   2007-07-13 02:07  

#3  He's unhappy as a mere prince, he wants to be a khaliph.
Posted by: twobyfour   2007-07-13 01:41  

#2  Won't someone please jam a damned sock into this fuckwit's piehole so he won't keep selling his mother country down the river at firesale prices?
Posted by: Zenster   2007-07-13 01:16  

#1  Has the Prince flipped completely and converted to Islam ?? Why does he persist in the ongoing flattery of Islam ?
Posted by: Woozle Elmeter2970   2007-07-13 00:59  

00:00